论商业标识法律保护体系
发布时间:2018-03-10 22:00
本文选题:商业标识 切入点:商业标识权 出处:《黑龙江大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:知识产权制度来源于西方,我国是从改革开放以来才重视相关法律的引进与研究,随着经济的蓬勃发展,国际贸易的频繁,知识产权的重要性日益凸显,作为知识产权重要组成部分的商业标识权也越来越受到公众的重视,商业标识具有识别性和纯粹的财产属性,凝聚着巨大的无形财产价值,对商业标识的法律保护往往反映着一个国家经济市场化发展的程度,以及立法水平。在我国,对商标的法律保护尤为重视,无论从法律法规上,还是相应的通知及司法解释上,在经济活动的方方面都对商标有明确的规定,但是却对其他商业标识在法律保护上出现忽略或空白。虽然因为世界贸易组织对成员国知识产权领域内的法律的硬性要求,迫使我国对相应的商标法进行一定的修改,并制定了其他单行法对相应的商业标识进行保护,但是单行法对对应的商业标识的保护都是独立的,无法体现商业标志之间在本质、功能上的共性和联系,又因为制定主体不一样,导致相关法律效力等级不同,法律之间的协调性不强,必然会产生权利之间的矛盾与冲突。如何选择有效的符合本土需求的法律保护模式,对商业标识进行梳理,化解矛盾与冲突,提高法律的有序性,实现法律的公平价值,是目前商标法修改过程中不可回避的重要问题。目前商业标识法律保护问题,最关键的就是法律保护模式的选择,法国采取的是知识产权法典模式,俄罗斯曾经采用过以商标法为基础的扩充模式,德国制定的足《商标法与其他商业标识法》,美国依然商标法模式进行保护,我国法律保护模式何去何从,是简单的法条汇编,还是系统的法律编撰,是单行法独力解决,还足形成有机体系化法律保护模式这将是我们重点讨论的问题。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property system originates from the west. Our country only pays attention to the introduction and research of relevant laws since the reform and opening up. With the vigorous development of economy and the frequent international trade, the importance of intellectual property rights becomes more and more prominent. As an important part of intellectual property rights, the right of commercial logo has been paid more and more attention by the public. The legal protection of commercial signs often reflects the degree of marketization of a country's economy and the level of legislation. In our country, the legal protection of trademarks is particularly important, whether in terms of laws and regulations, corresponding notices and judicial interpretations. There are clear provisions on trademarks on all sides of economic activities, but other commercial logos are ignored or blank in legal protection. Although the World Trade Organization requires the laws of member States in the field of intellectual property rights, Forcing our country to amend the corresponding trademark law to some extent, and make other separate laws to protect the corresponding commercial logo, but the protection of the corresponding commercial mark is independent, which can not reflect the essence of the commercial mark. The commonness and connection in function, and because the subject of the formulation is not the same, resulting in different levels of relevant legal effectiveness, the coordination between the laws is not strong. It is inevitable that there will be contradictions and conflicts between rights. How to choose an effective legal protection mode that meets the local needs, sort out the commercial signs, resolve the contradictions and conflicts, improve the order of the law, and realize the fair value of the law. It is an important issue that cannot be evaded in the process of trademark law revision at present. At present, the choice of legal protection mode is the most crucial issue in the legal protection of commercial logos. France adopts the model of intellectual property code. Russia has adopted an expanded model based on trademark law. Germany has formulated the "Trademark Law and other Commercial marking Law". The United States still protects the trademark law model. Where is our legal protection model going? it is a simple compilation of laws. Or the systematic compilation of laws, is a single law to solve alone, but also enough to form an organic system of legal protection model which will be the focus of our discussion.
【学位授予单位】:黑龙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.43
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 潘伟;论商号权与商标权的权利冲突[J];中华商标;2001年08期
2 陶鑫良;面对第二次修改后的《商标法》的思绪[J];中华商标;2001年12期
3 李永明;麻剑辉;;商标权与商号权的权利冲突及解决途径[J];法学家;2002年04期
4 徐升权;;论“商业标识权”[J];知识产权;2012年09期
,本文编号:1595247
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1595247.html