我国著作权的刑事司法保护研究

发布时间:2018-03-10 23:22

  本文选题:著作权 切入点:著作权法 出处:《中原工学院》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:著作权是指基于文学、艺术和科学作品依法产生的权利。著作权属于知识产权的范畴,是一种民事权利,包括著作人身权和著作财产权两个方面。正是因为著作权的财产属性,其能够为使用人带来一定的经济利益,也就产生了侵犯著作权的违法、甚或是犯罪的现象。侵犯著作权的犯罪不等于侵犯著作权罪,它指的是系列犯罪的统称。当前,随着知识经济价值的进一步凸显,社会实践中侵犯著作权的犯罪数量急剧增加且有蔓延之势,从犯罪主体来看,个体犯罪不再是主流,团伙犯罪、集团犯罪占据了主导地位;从犯罪手段来看,利用网络进行犯罪的现象增多。这些犯罪已经严重侵犯了著作权人应有的合法权益、损害了国家对著作权的正常管理秩序和社会主义市场经济秩序的合理发展,削弱了社会主体著作权创作的积极性,阻碍了我国知识经济的健康、快速发展,也影响了我国的国际声誉。当然,侵犯著作权的犯罪的滋生也充分反映了我国刑事法律制度和刑事司法实践活动在规范和打击侵犯著作权犯罪方面仍然存在不足,也充分反映了加强相关法制建设和进一步加强刑事司法保护的必要性。著作权的刑事司法保护就是通过刑事司法机关的刑事侦查、公诉、刑事审判和刑罚执行活动实现对著作权的保护。进行著作权刑事司法保护是完善和补充我国著作权刑事法律制度的需要、是打击和预防侵犯著作权犯罪行为的需要、是维护著作权利人合法权益的需要、是保证市场经济健康发展的需要。但是,当前我国著作权刑事司法保护仍然存在着一定问题和挑战,著作权刑事司法保护存在着固有的缺陷,如人员不足、专业素养不强、机构建设不健全、存在懒政和贪污腐败的现象;侵犯著作权犯罪的罪与非罪的司法认定存在难点、侵犯著作权罪与他罪的关系处理存在争议;行政执法与刑事司法的衔接存在问题;刑事司法中的裁判标准存在问题;网络版权犯罪行为的法律适用和使用新技术手段对版权侵权行为的入罪都存在问题;侵犯著作权的犯罪出现了新情况。这些都严重影响了刑事司法机关的办案成效,影响了对侵犯著作权犯罪的有效打击和预防,必须予以完善。完善著作权刑事司法保护,首先是要完善著作权的刑事法律制度体系;要解决司法机关中的痼疾,提高著作权刑事司法保护的效率和水平;要严格按照刑法总则中的刑法基本原则、犯罪的定义和构成刑法分则中的明文规定,准确处理侵犯著作权罪中罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的认定;实现著作权刑事救济与民事救济高效搭配;实现著作权行政执法和刑事司法的无缝衔接;要勇于刺破新技术的面纱;要注重公诉与自诉的有机结合;要注意处理好个人利益与社会利益、强保护与弱保护的关系。
[Abstract]:Copyright is a kind of civil right which is based on the law of literature, art and science. It belongs to the category of intellectual property, and it includes the personal right of the author and the property right of the work. It is precisely because of the property attribute of the copyright that the copyright belongs to the category of intellectual property. It can bring certain economic benefits to the user, and it will result in the violation of copyright, or even the phenomenon of crime. The crime of infringing upon copyright is not equal to the crime of infringing on copyright. It refers to the general name of a series of crimes. At present, With the further highlight of the value of knowledge economy, the number of copyright infringement crimes in social practice has increased sharply and spread. From the point of view of the main body of crime, individual crime is no longer the mainstream, gang crime, group crime occupies a dominant position; From the point of view of criminal means, the phenomenon of using the network to commit crimes has increased. These crimes have seriously violated the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners. It has damaged the normal management order of the state copyright and the rational development of the socialist market economic order, weakened the enthusiasm of the copyright creation of the social subject, and hindered the healthy and rapid development of the knowledge economy in our country. It also affects our country's international reputation. Of course, the breeding of crimes against copyright also fully reflects the inadequacy of our criminal legal system and criminal judicial practice in standardizing and cracking down on copyright infringement crimes. It also fully reflects the necessity of strengthening the construction of relevant legal systems and further strengthening the protection of criminal justice. The criminal judicial protection of copyright is through criminal investigation and public prosecution by criminal judicial organs. Criminal trial and penalty enforcement activities to achieve the protection of copyright. Criminal judicial protection of copyright is the need to perfect and supplement the criminal legal system of copyright in our country, and the need to combat and prevent criminal acts against copyright. It is the need to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the copyright holders and to ensure the healthy development of the market economy. However, there are still some problems and challenges in the criminal judicial protection of copyright in our country. There are inherent defects in criminal judicial protection of copyright, such as insufficient personnel, weak professional accomplishment, imperfect institution construction, lazy administration and corruption, difficulties in judicial determination of crime and non-crime of infringing copyright, There are disputes on the relationship between copyright infringement and other crimes, problems in the connection between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice, problems in the standard of adjudication in criminal justice; There are problems in the legal application of network copyright crimes and in the criminalization of copyright infringement by using new technological means. New situations have emerged in copyright infringement crimes. These have seriously affected the effectiveness of criminal justice organs in handling cases. It is necessary to perfect the criminal judicial protection of copyright, first of all, to perfect the criminal legal system of copyright, to solve the chronic malady in judicial organs, Improving the efficiency and level of criminal judicial protection of copyright, strictly following the basic principles of criminal law in the general provisions of the criminal law, the definition of crime and the explicit provisions in the specific provisions of the constitution of the criminal law, and accurately handling the crime and non-crime in the crime of infringing upon copyright, The identification of this crime and that crime, the realization of the efficient combination of criminal remedy and civil remedy of copyright, the seamless connection of administrative law enforcement of copyright and criminal judicature, the courage to break through the veil of new technology, the emphasis on the organic combination of public prosecution and private prosecution; Attention should be paid to the relationship between personal and social interests and between strong and weak protection.
【学位授予单位】:中原工学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.41

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 梁晏婷;从“新搜案”看著作权保护[J];软件工程师;2002年04期

2 柳励和;高校普及著作权知识的迫切性[J];株洲工学院学报;2002年S1期

3 翟霞;网络传播与著作权保护[J];理论学刊;2002年05期

4 余波;著作权保护的社会学考量[J];中国出版;2004年12期

5 王媛;;著作权保护问题浅析[J];中共郑州市委党校学报;2004年03期

6 石瓶门;;网络发展与著作权保护不能互为代价[J];中国信息界;2004年19期

7 刘静玲;档案与著作权保护[J];兰台世界;2005年12期

8 香江波;对著作权的限制通常分为哪些种类[J];出版参考;2005年10期

9 韩苏闽;;图书馆数字资源著作权的保护和使用[J];医学信息;2006年03期

10 任玉翠;;数字图书馆数据库著作权保护研究[J];江西社会科学;2006年11期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 张俊霞;;论网络信息著作权的刑法保护[A];中国犯罪学学会第十八届学术研讨会论文集(下册)[C];2009年

2 阚有清;;图书馆服务与著作权的合理使用[A];福建省图书馆学会2008年学术年会论文集[C];2008年

3 庞怡;杨红春;;试论网络环境下信息资源共建共享涉及的著作权保护问题[A];信息时代科技情报研究、科技期刊编辑学术论文集[C];2004年

4 侯翠香;;新环境下科技期刊的著作权保护[A];中国气象学会2005年年会论文集[C];2005年

5 毛旭;;馆藏文献的著作权保护和归属[A];文化大省建设中的图书馆现代化——浙江省图书馆学会第八次学术研讨会论文集[C];2001年

6 曹越;;从想像到现实——中国情境下的著作权[A];全球信息化时代的华人传播研究:力量汇聚与学术创新——2003中国传播学论坛暨CAC/CCA中华传播学术研讨会论文集(下册)[C];2004年

7 吴淑金;李强;陈兵;袁宁;杜冠辉;陈嘉伟;宋妮妮;;论网络环境下学术期刊的著作权及其保护[A];“广东科技情报服务促进广东经济发展”综合研讨会论文集[C];2007年

8 巩R,

本文编号:1595525


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1595525.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户6396b***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com