日本专利无效判定制度之改革及其启示

发布时间：2018-03-13 16:20

本文选题：日本专利法　切入点：专利无效判定二元制　出处：《法商研究》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：日本最高法院在2000年的"基尔比案"中肯定了法院对专利有效性进行判定的权力,于2004年修订《日本专利法》创设专利无效判定二元制,但该制度在实践中的运行效果欠佳。为此,针对专利无效判定二元制实施中出现的问题,《日本专利法》于2011年再次修订,规定法院判决生效后,特许厅所确定的无效审决及订正审决均不得作为专利侵权诉讼再审之理由。日本2011年修法的导向是鼓励当事人在专利侵权诉讼初期积极地向特许厅提起专利无效审决或订正审决,倾向于将专利有效性问题交由特许厅来裁决。我国目前尚不具备专利无效司法判定的条件,应积极探索设立知识产权上诉法院,统一审判标准,完善技术调查官制度,以发挥有限而有效的司法救济功能。
[Abstract]:In the Kilby case on 2000, the Supreme Court of Japan affirmed the power of the court to determine the validity of a patent. In 2004, the Japanese Patent Law amended the Japanese Patent Law to create a dualistic system of patent invalidation. But the effect of this system is not good in practice. Therefore, in view of the problems in the implementation of dualistic system of patent invalidation, the Japanese Patent Law was revised again on 2011, stipulating that after the judgment of the court came into effect, The invalid and revised decisions determined by the concession office shall not be used as grounds for retrial of patent infringement actions. The purpose of the amendment law of 2011 in japan is to encourage the parties to actively file patent invalidation with the concessionaire in the early stages of patent infringement proceedings. A judgment or revision, At present, China does not have the conditions for judicial adjudication of patent invalidation. We should actively explore the establishment of an appeal court for intellectual property rights, unify the trial standards, and improve the system of technical investigators. In order to play a limited and effective function of judicial relief.
【作者单位】：中南大学法学院;
【基金】：国家哲学社会科学基金项目(13CFX090) 法治湖南建设与区域社会治理协同创新中心平台建设资助项目
【分类号】：D923.42;D931.3;DD913

【相似文献】