商业秘密侵权损害赔偿研究
本文选题:商业秘密 切入点:侵权纠纷 出处:《北京化工大学》2013年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:商业秘密是知识产权的重要组成部分,,是企业重要的无形财产,关系企业生存和发展。在我国国际贸易和交往日益频繁的今天,国家和企业也日益重视对商业秘密的保护。但是实践中商业秘密侵权案件仍旧频频发生,受害人企业通过侵权损害赔偿诉讼难于很好地保护自己,首先固然是因为这部分企业商业秘密保护意识单薄和保护手段缺失,其次,我国尚无专门的商业秘密保护法,对商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的立法极其简单,同时,在商业秘密侵权损害赔偿案件中,商业秘密侵权损害赔偿额的确定是案件审判的焦点,是所有商业秘密侵权案件必须解决的问题,但是,其计算方法和范围仍有许多值得探讨的技术性问题。 本文围绕商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的问题,通过对我国立法情况进行梳理,对中外商业秘密侵权损害赔偿案例进行分析研究,指出我国现有赔偿中存在的问题,借鉴美日两国的立法与实践,对进一步完善我国商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的计算方法提出建议。本文分为四个部分: 第一部分概述商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的概念、功能与目的、法理基础及商业秘密侵权损害赔偿责任的构成要件。 第二部分分析我国商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的立法和司法实践。首先,笔者对我国自改革开放以来商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的立法和司法解释进行了梳理,然后搜罗并分析我国各地区法院在商业商业秘密侵权案件中的做法,最后通过具体案例分析指出我国目前立法和司法实践中商业秘密侵权损害赔偿计算方法方面的不足之处。 第三部分论述美国、日本、德国和台湾地区商业秘密侵权损害赔偿的立法和实践,总结这些国家和地区在商业秘密侵权损害赔偿中的经验。 第四部分提出完善我国商业秘密侵权损害赔偿计算方法的建议,包括明确计算公式中的因素,明确侵权损害赔偿的范围、建立惩罚性赔偿制度等。
[Abstract]:Trade secret is an important component of intellectual property rights and an important intangible property of enterprises. It is related to the survival and development of enterprises. Today, with the increasing frequency of international trade and exchanges in China, The state and enterprises also pay more and more attention to the protection of trade secrets. However, in practice, trade secret infringement cases still occur frequently, and it is difficult for victim enterprises to protect themselves very well through tort damages litigation. First of all, it is because this part of the business secret protection consciousness is weak and the means of protection are lacking. Secondly, there is no special trade secret protection law in our country, and the legislation of compensation for trade secret infringement damage is extremely simple. At the same time, In the case of compensation for trade secret infringement damage, the determination of the amount of compensation for trade secret infringement is the focus of the case trial, and it is a problem that must be solved in all trade secret infringement cases. However, There are still many technical problems in the calculation method and scope. This paper focuses on the problem of compensation for infringement of trade secrets, through combing the legislative situation of our country, analyzes and studies the cases of compensation for infringement of trade secrets between China and foreign countries, and points out the problems existing in the present compensation of trade secrets in our country. Based on the legislation and practice of the United States and Japan, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to further improve the calculation method of the damages for the infringement of trade secrets in China. This paper is divided into four parts:. The first part summarizes the concept, function and purpose of the compensation for trade secret infringement damage, the legal basis and the constitutive requirements of the liability for trade secret infringement damage compensation. The second part analyzes the legislation and judicial practice of trade secret infringement compensation in China. Firstly, the author sorts out the legislative and judicial explanation of trade secret infringement compensation since the reform and opening up. Then it analyzes the practices of the commercial secret infringement cases in various district courts of our country, and points out the shortcomings of the calculation method of the trade secret infringement damages in the current legislation and judicial practice of our country through the concrete case analysis. The third part discusses the legislation and practice of the trade secret infringement compensation in the United States, Japan, Germany and Taiwan, and summarizes the experience of these countries and regions in the trade secret infringement compensation. In the 4th part, the author puts forward some suggestions for perfecting the calculation method of the tort damages in China's trade secrets, including the factors in the calculation formula, the scope of the damages for infringement and the establishment of the punitive damages system and so on.
【学位授予单位】:北京化工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.4;D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 彭学龙;美国EFCO公司诉Symons公司案浅析[J];电子知识产权;2003年11期
2 徐朝贤;美、德、日商业秘密侵权救济制度的发展及借鉴[J];河北法学;2001年02期
3 张会^H;;不同侵权责任承担方式的构成要件[J];河北法学;2009年05期
4 韩中节;;论侵犯商业秘密案件审判中的几个问题[J];河北法学;2009年09期
5 黄武双;;美国商业秘密法的最新发展评析[J];华东政法大学学报;2007年06期
6 黎桦;侵犯商业秘密的惩罚性赔偿研究[J];科技与法律;2005年01期
7 黄武双;;美国商业秘密侵权赔偿责任研究[J];科技与法律;2010年05期
8 李春华,王合新;美、日商业秘密侵权救济制度之比较[J];山东社会科学;2003年06期
9 沈强;;论商业秘密侵权损害赔偿[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2009年04期
10 李明德;杜邦公司诉克里斯托夫——美国商业秘密法研究[J];外国法译评;2000年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 蒋红莲;商业秘密法律救济制度研究[D];华东政法大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 成娜;完善专利侵权制度的若干思考[D];烟台大学;2010年
2 董邦林;论完善我国商业秘密侵权的民事救济制度[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2001年
3 林志根;商业秘密侵权及其民事司法救济探讨[D];湘潭大学;2003年
4 韩爱珍;美国商业秘密侵权损害赔偿计算方法研究及借鉴[D];华东政法大学;2012年
本文编号:1614486
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1614486.html