知识产权损害赔偿的证据规则研究

发布时间：2018-03-19 01:13

  本文选题：知识产权　切入点：证据规则　出处：《华南理工大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在知识产权侵权诉讼过程中，查明并准确认定侵权损害赔偿数额，一直以来都是法院审判工作中面临的难题。认定侵权损害赔偿数额的关键在于查明权利人因侵权行为造成的实际损失和侵权人侵权获利的事实，而事实查明的关键最终又落在了证据的收集和认定上。解决知识产权证据的收集和认定问题（本文所研究的证据，主要指损害赔偿数额证据），，有助于查明和准确认定侵权损害赔偿数额。 有鉴于此，本文分析了知识产权损害赔偿证据的特点，指出当前司法实践中收集和审查认定损害赔偿证据存在的困难，认为通过灵活运用证据规则，能拓宽收集损害赔偿证据的途径和提高审查认定证据的能力，有助于法院准确认定侵权损害赔偿数额。本文比较借鉴了域外的立法和司法经验，将知识产权损害赔偿证据规则分为证据收集规则和证据认定规则进行研究。知识产权损害赔偿证据的收集规则包括证据保全和证据披露规则，它们共同提高了当事人收集证据的能力，拓宽证据收集的途径，有助于克服知识产权损害赔偿证据长期存在的取证困难问题，让更多关键证据进入到案件审理的过程，为查明损害赔偿事实提供必要的基础。知识产权损害赔偿证据的认定规则包括举证妨碍规则、优势证据标准和专家辅助人制度。其中，举证妨碍规则对消极提供证据的持有人课以必要的法律责任和后果，确保运用证据保全和证据披露规则收集证据的效果，为法官应对证据持有人消极举证提供解决思路和方法；优势证据标准适当降低权利人损失或侵权人获利等证据的证明标准，强调法官依法灵活运用自由裁量认定损害赔偿数额，减少法定赔偿的机械适用；专家辅助人制度弥补我国司法鉴定制度的不足，提高司法鉴定结论的准确性和可信度，为法官审查判断损害赔偿证据提供专业的参考意见。笔者认为，司法在保护知识产权方面将逐渐起到主导作用，合理确定侵权损害赔偿数额，才能有效遏止知识产权侵权行为，永葆知识产权权利人创新发展的动力。加强知识产权损害赔偿证据规则的研究，灵活运用证据规则查明侵权损害赔偿数额，有助于解决知识产权侵权损害赔偿难问题，充分发挥司法保护知识产权发展的重要作用。
[Abstract]:To ascertain and accurately determine the amount of damages for infringement of intellectual property rights in the course of litigation for infringement of intellectual property rights, The key to determining the amount of damages for infringement lies in ascertaining the actual losses caused by the infringement by the obligee and the fact that the infringer has made profits from the infringement. However, the key to finding out the facts finally lies in the collection and identification of evidence, which solves the problem of collecting and recognizing the evidence of intellectual property rights (the evidence studied in this paper, Mainly refers to the amount of damages evidence, help to identify and accurately determine the amount of tort damages. In view of this, this paper analyzes the characteristics of evidence for compensation for intellectual property damage, points out the difficulties in collecting and examining evidence for damages in current judicial practice, and points out that through the flexible application of evidence rules, It can broaden the way of collecting evidence of compensation for damages and improve the ability of examining and confirming the evidence, which is helpful for the court to accurately determine the amount of damages for infringement. The evidence rules for intellectual property damages are divided into evidence collection rules and evidence recognition rules. The rules for the collection of evidence for intellectual property damage compensation include the rules for the preservation of evidence and the disclosure of evidence. Together, they improve the ability of the parties to collect evidence, broaden the channels of evidence collection, help to overcome the long-standing difficulty of obtaining evidence for intellectual property damage compensation, and allow more key evidence to enter the process of trial. To provide the necessary basis for ascertaining the facts of compensation for damages. The rules governing the determination of evidence for damages in intellectual property rights include the rules of proof hindrance, the standard of superior evidence and the system of expert auxiliaries. The proof hindrance rules impose necessary legal responsibility and consequences on the holders who provide negative evidence, ensure the effect of collecting evidence by using the rules of evidence preservation and disclosure, and provide the judges with solutions to the negative proof of evidence holders; The standard of superior evidence should reduce the proof standard of the loss of the right holder or the profit of the infringer, and emphasize that the judge can flexibly use the discretion to determine the amount of damages according to law, and reduce the mechanical application of the legal compensation; The expert assistant system makes up for the deficiency of the judicial expertise system in our country, improves the accuracy and credibility of the judicial expertise conclusion, and provides the professional reference for the judge to examine and judge the evidence of compensation for damages. The judicial system will gradually play a leading role in the protection of intellectual property rights. Only by rationally determining the amount of compensation for infringement damages can we effectively curb the infringement of intellectual property rights. Strengthening the research on the rules of evidence for compensation for intellectual property damage and flexibly applying the rules of evidence to find out the amount of compensation for infringement of intellectual property rights will help to solve the problem of the difficulty of compensation for infringement of intellectual property rights. We will give full play to the important role of judicial protection of intellectual property rights.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.13

【参考文献】

中国期刊全文数据库 前7条

1 刘红;浅析知识产权技术鉴定程序[J];电子知识产权;2004年11期

2 邹碧华;;我们应当怎样对待证据规则[J];法律适用;2006年Z1期

3 张广良;;举证妨碍规则在知识产权诉讼中的适用问题研究[J];法律适用;2008年07期

4 邢学毅;;论在医疗纠纷诉讼中推行专家辅助人制度[J];证据科学;2009年03期

5 常林;;司法鉴定与“案结事了”[J];证据科学;2009年05期

6 徐春建;刘思彬;张学军;;知识产权损害赔偿的证据规则[J];人民司法;2012年17期

7 张广良;;举证妨碍规则在知识产权案件中的适用——九阳公司、王旭宁诉帅佳公司等侵犯发明专利权纠纷案评析[J];中国专利与商标;2008年02期

本文编号：1632156