中国FTAs知识产权条款研究

发布时间：2018-03-19 00:36

本文选题：中国FTAs　切入点：TRIPS　出处：《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：随着货物贸易、服务贸易在全球范围内展开合作，知识产权保护的国际合作也成为国际经济领域的重要合作内容。TRIPS协定中有很多为照顾发展中国家利益而规定的弹性条款，而近年来，，发达国家不满足TRIPS协定规定的知识产权保护水平，想通过各种方法提高知识产权保护水平。由于多哈回合谈判的停滞不前，发达国家将自由贸易协定作为其推行“超TRIPS”条款的主要方式，给经济发展和知识产权保护水平差异很大的发展中国家带来很多压力。中国是TRIPS协定下最大的发展中国家，当下签订的FTAs中知识产权条款存在很多问题，知识产权自由贸易协定战略安排体系也比较薄弱，不足以应对当下发达国家强势的“超TRIPS”规则。本文即以TRIPS协定为基础，对中国FTAs知识产权条款存在的问题以及新出现的“超TRIPS”条款展开研究，为中国日后签订FTA知识产权规则提供借鉴意义。文章分为以下六个部分：第一部分是关于中国FTAs知识产权条款的概述。文章采用历史分析方法、比较分析方法，梳理了中国当下签订的7个包含知识产权条款的自由贸易协定的规定情况，对每个FTA知识产权条款内容做了简要介绍，并提出本文研究的的命题。第二部分分析了中国FTAs知识产权总则条款。运用比较分析和综合分析的方法，将中国FTAs知识产权总则条款与TRIPS协定的总则条款进行对比，发现其在结构和内容上存在的问题，并加以分析。第三部分对中国FTAs知识产权实体性条款进行分析。该部分先梳理了中国FTAs中知识产权实体性条款的规定情况，并选取遗传资源、传统知识和民间文艺保护条款、版权及相关权利保护条款、未披露信息保护条款为代表性条款进行深入分析。第四部分对中国FTAs知识产权程序性条款进行分析。该部分选取争端解决条款和知识产权执法条款为分析对象，找出与TRIPS协定规定不一致之处，并分析执法部分“超TRIPS”条款对我国执法机构带来的不利影响，以及争端解决机制存在的问题。第五部分总结分析了中国FTAs知识产权条款存在的问题。该部分在前述条款论述的基础上总结出中国FTAs知识产权条款存在的整体性问题，主要有未形成范本模式，表述不够严谨，协定内部某些条款缺乏协调性等。第六部分论述了对我国FTAs知识产权条款的完善研究。该部分针对前述分析中国FTAs知识产权条款存在的问题，对我国日后签订FTA知识产权条款应对“超TRIPS”规则提供对策建议。结语部分对全文进行总结。
[Abstract]:With the trade in goods and trade in services, the international cooperation in the protection of intellectual property rights has become an important part of international economic cooperation. The trips Agreement has many flexible provisions to cater for the interests of developing countries. In recent years, however, developed countries have failed to meet the level of intellectual property protection stipulated in the TRIPS Agreement and have sought to raise the level of intellectual property protection by various means. Developed countries regard free trade agreements as their main way of carrying out the "super TRIPS" clause, which brings a lot of pressure to developing countries whose economic development and intellectual property protection level are very different. China is the largest developing country under the TRIPS Agreement. There are many problems in the intellectual property provisions in the current FTAs, and the strategic arrangement system of the intellectual property Free Trade Agreement is also relatively weak, which is not sufficient to deal with the "super TRIPS" rules of the developed countries. This paper is based on the TRIPS Agreement. This paper studies the problems existing in the intellectual property provisions of China's FTAs and the new "super TRIPS" clauses, which provide a reference for China to sign the FTA intellectual property rules in the future. The article is divided into the following six parts:. The first part is an overview of the intellectual property provisions of China's FTAs. The article uses the historical analysis method, comparative analysis method, combing the current China signed seven free trade agreements containing intellectual property provisions of the provisions. The content of each FTA intellectual property clause is briefly introduced, and the proposition studied in this paper is put forward. The second part analyzes the general provisions of China's FTAs intellectual property rights. By means of comparative analysis and comprehensive analysis, the article compares the general provisions of China's FTAs intellectual property rights with those of the TRIPS Agreement, and finds out the problems existing in its structure and content. And analyze it. The third part analyzes the substantive provisions of intellectual property rights in China's FTAs. This part first combs the provisions of the substantive provisions of intellectual property rights in China's FTAs, and selects genetic resources, traditional knowledge and folk literature and art protection provisions. Copyright and related rights protection provisions, undisclosed information protection provisions for representative provisions for in-depth analysis. Part 4th analyzes the procedural provisions of intellectual property rights of FTAs in China. This part selects the dispute settlement clause and the enforcement clause of intellectual property as the object of analysis, and finds out the inconsistency with the provisions of the TRIPS Agreement. It also analyzes the adverse effects of the "super TRIPS" clause on the law enforcement agencies in China and the existing problems in the dispute settlement mechanism. Part 5th summarizes and analyzes the problems existing in the intellectual property provisions of FTAs in China. The expression is not strict enough, some provisions of the agreement lack coordination and so on. Part 6th discusses the improvement of the FTAs intellectual property provisions in China. This part analyzes the problems existing in China's FTAs intellectual property provisions, and provides countermeasures and suggestions for the future signing of FTA intellectual property provisions in China in accordance with the "super TRIPS" rules. The conclusion part summarizes the full text.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】