商标专用权行政执法与刑事司法衔接问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-22 11:37

本文选题：商标专用权　切入点：行政执法　出处：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：商标专用权是商标权人对其注册商标享有的具有排他性的权利。商标侵权行为在日常生活中随处可见，我国每年都在加大行政执法力度用以杜绝此类行为的发生，然而效果欠佳。工商行政管理部门对于侵犯商标专用权的行为具有行政处罚的权力，同时由于我国对知识产权的保护采取“双轨制”模式，侵犯商标专用权的行为也可能涉嫌构成知识产权犯罪。因此，就产生了行政执法机关如何移送涉嫌构成犯罪的违法行为至司法机关的问题。本文除导言外，共分为四章，分别从规范分析、实证分析、原因分析以及完善建议四个方面展开论述。第一章商标“两法衔接”之规范分析，将规定商标侵权行为的行政法律法规与刑事法律条文作为本章的分析对象，通过对法律法规条文的剖析，逐条梳理在商标侵权中同时受两个部门法调整的违法行为。通过对法律规范的拆分与整合，分析出我国在商标专用权保护中对于违法案件之所以难以移送的立法层面原因。第二章商标“两法衔接”之实证分析，通过分析知识产权局、商标局以及法院的年度报告，从中提取相关数据来反映当前我国在商标执法中的案件移送情况，，以及近几年商标刑事判决与行政处罚的数量关系。通过几组数据的对比分析，发现在“两法衔接”中依旧存在着有案不移、以罚代刑等现象。第三章商标“两法衔接”不畅之原因分析。通过前两章的阐述，可以得出在商标侵权领域中衔接难主要表现为有案不移、以罚代刑。那么产生这种现象的原因主要有三个方面：1、立法上存在不一致，导致了案件在移送时无法做到有序对接，法律规范上的缺口给了行政执法机关自由裁量的权力。2、程序上存在两种适用模式，导致了行政执法机关在案件移送的过程中出现了两种不同的结果。3、监督机制不完善，无论再好的执法都需要具备相应的监督机制，在“两法衔接”中也不例外，缺少必要且全面的监督机制，是违法案件没有全部得到移送的原因之一。第四章商标“两法衔接”之完善建议。通过上文的分析，指出了我国“两法衔接”机制运用于商标专用权保护上的困难表现及原因分析。本章则是分别对这些造成衔接困难的原因提出完善建议，以期能够建立一个更为有效、具有可操作性的“两法衔接”机制。
[Abstract]:Trademark exclusive right is the exclusive right of trademark owner to its registered trademark. Trademark infringement can be seen everywhere in daily life. However, the effect is not good. The administrative department for industry and commerce has the power of administrative punishment for the infringement of trademark exclusive rights. At the same time, the protection of intellectual property rights in our country adopts a "two-track system" model. The infringement of trademark exclusive rights may also be suspected of constituting an intellectual property crime. Therefore, the question arises as to how the administrative law enforcement agencies transfer the illegal acts suspected to constitute a crime to the judicial organs. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into four chapters, from normative analysis, empirical analysis, cause analysis and suggestions to improve the four aspects. The first chapter is the normative analysis of trademark "two laws linking up", which takes administrative laws and criminal laws and regulations that stipulate trademark infringement as the analysis object of this chapter, and through the analysis of laws and regulations, Through the separation and integration of legal norms, this paper analyzes the legislative reasons why it is difficult to transfer illegal cases in the protection of trademark exclusive rights in China. Chapter II empirical analysis of trademark "two laws link", through the analysis of the intellectual property Office, the Trademark Office and the court of the annual report, extract relevant data to reflect the current law enforcement in China in the transfer of cases, Through the comparison and analysis of several groups of data, it is found that there are still some phenomena in "two laws linking up", such as not shifting cases and replacing punishment with punishment. The third chapter analyzes the reasons why the "two methods" are not smooth. Through the exposition of the first two chapters, it can be concluded that the difficulty of linking up in the field of trademark infringement is mainly manifested in the absence of cases. To substitute punishment for punishment. Well, the main reasons for this phenomenon are three aspects: 1. There is inconsistency in legislation, which leads to the fact that the cases cannot be docked in an orderly manner when they are transferred. The gap in legal norms gives the administrative law enforcement agencies the discretion of the power. There are two applicable modes in the procedure, which leads to two different results of the administrative law enforcement agencies in the process of transferring cases, and the supervision mechanism is not perfect. No matter how good the law enforcement is, it is necessary to have the corresponding supervision mechanism. The lack of necessary and comprehensive supervision mechanism is one of the reasons why all illegal cases are not transferred. Chapter IV: suggestions for the perfection of the Trademark "two laws join". Through the above analysis, The paper points out that the mechanism of "two laws joining" is difficult to apply to the protection of trademark exclusive right in our country and the reasons are analyzed. This chapter is to put forward some suggestions to perfect the reasons of these difficulties in connection, in order to establish a more effective one. The mechanism of "two methods joining" is operable.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.43;D922.1;D925.2

【参考文献】