我国内地与港澳知识产权冲突解决路径探析

发布时间:2018-03-23 20:25

  本文选题:知识产权冲突 切入点:冲突立法与实践 出处:《暨南大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国内地与港澳知识产权冲突的存在有其特定的历史、经济、文化等原因,不论是在知识产权的实体法方面还是程序法方面内地与港澳的知识产权制度都存在差异,在实质上制约着区域间的经济交流合作。粤港澳更紧密合作区的建立和实现要求在实践中建立一套从根本上解决知识产权冲突的协调机制。通过逻辑分析和比较分析,借鉴国际上的先进经验,设想在我国粤港澳地区进行先试,法律先行,从《宪法》、《立法法》、《地方组织法》等从上到下的法律赋予地方政府签订此类协议的权利,并对其生效条件、生效程序、争端解决等做出原则性和相对具体性的规定。同时辅之以一套相对完整的协调机构,,即建立一套包含有决策机构、常设机构、争端解决机构等在内的完善机构组织,辅之以优先权制度、转换申请制度和专门法院管辖等制度的复式知识产权制度,同时充分发挥专业团体以及民间组织的作用,以期望为解决我国内地与港澳知识产权冲突提供帮助。
[Abstract]:There are specific historical, economic and cultural reasons for the existence of the intellectual property conflict between Hong Kong and Macao in China's mainland, and there are differences in the intellectual property rights system between the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao, both in substantive and procedural aspects of intellectual property rights. The establishment and realization of a closer cooperation zone between Guangdong, Hong Kong and Macao requires the establishment and implementation of a set of coordination mechanisms to fundamentally resolve intellectual property conflicts in practice. Through logical analysis and comparative analysis, Drawing on advanced international experience, it is envisaged that the local governments will be given the right to sign such agreements from the Constitution, the Legislative Law, the Local Organization Law, and other top-down laws in Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macao. And to make provisions of principle and relative specificity on the conditions for its entry into force, procedures for entry into force, dispute settlement, etc., supplemented by a relatively complete coordinating body, that is, to establish a set of permanent bodies consisting of decision-making bodies, Perfect institutional organizations, such as dispute settlement bodies, are complemented by a system of priority, a system of conversion applications and a system of dual intellectual property rights such as the jurisdiction of specialized courts, and at the same time give full play to the role of professional organizations and civil society organizations. In order to help resolve the intellectual property conflicts between mainland China and Hong Kong and Macao.
【学位授予单位】:暨南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.4

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 李正华;中美知识产权制度比较研究[J];比较法研究;2003年02期

2 周素红;陈慧玮;;美国大都市区规划组织的区域协调机制及其对中国的启示[J];国际城市规划;2008年06期

3 王锡麟;欧共体知识产权跨国法律保护体制的分析[J];华东科技;1998年08期

4 郭玉军;徐锦堂;;中国区际法律冲突解决路径探析(上)[J];时代法学;2008年01期

5 冯心明;;CEPA框架下内地与港澳知识产权法律冲突与解决[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年01期

6 何渊;;我国区域协调发展的法制困境与解决路径[J];南京社会科学;2009年11期

7 王畅;邓媛;;内地与香港在CEPA框架下的知识产权法律问题初析[J];中国科技信息;2006年16期

8 朱雪忠,柳福东;欧盟商标法律制度的协调机制及其对我国的启示[J];中国法学;2001年04期



本文编号:1655049

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1655049.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fa5e7***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com