论行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中的运用

发布时间：2018-03-28 05:32

本文选题：行政证据　切入点：刑事诉讼　出处：《浙江工商大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国的行政执法和刑事司法衔接机制已经发展的较为成熟,但是针对其中的证据衔接问题却少有规定,理论研究也比较薄弱。最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、司法部联合出台的《关于办理侵犯知识产权刑事案件适用法律若干问题的意见》首次对行政证据材料的刑事证据能力作出了规定,但是由于其法律效力较低,难以在司法实践中发挥作用。新《刑事诉讼法》明确规定了行政机关在行政执法和查办案件过程中收集的证据材料在刑事诉讼中可以作为证据使用,这是两法衔接机制发展的一大突破,但是仅仅用一款条文来对证据衔接这个重要的问题进行规定,可能无法达到预期的效果。本文主要采用分类、比较、法条解释、实证研究等方法对行政机关收集的证据材料在刑事诉讼中的运用问题进行了全面的剖析和阐述。文章在引言部分主要阐述了行政机关和刑事司法机关证据衔接问题的现状、新《刑事诉讼法》第五十二条规定出台的背景以及研究这个论题的重要性和新颖性。文章主体内容分为四个部分,具体研究思路和设计如下：第一部分是对行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中运用的基本理论的研究。这一部分首先阐述了行政证据的内涵,对“证据”和“证据材料’进行了区别分析,然后对行政证据与刑事诉讼证据进行了比较研究,总结了二者的共同点和差异性,最后对行政证据在刑事诉讼中运用的价值进行了分析。第二部分是分析行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中运用存在的问题。首先说明我国现行立法对行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中的运用规定的不够完善,对很多问题没有进行明确的规定,尤其是程序性的规定,不同的部门针对这个问题所作的法律解释之间存在矛盾,这些问题都将导致这个新规定在司法实践中不能得到很好地适用。其次对新规定在实施过程中可能产生的问题进行了分析、预测。第三部分是行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中运用的完善。这部分是文章的主体部分,主要是针对第二部分提出的不足之处进行完善。首先是针对立法中存在的问题需采取的措施：明确可以在刑事诉讼中使用的行政证据种类,对行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中运用的具体程序作出规定,推进法律解释的统一化；其次是针对新规定在实施过程可能存在的问题进行的完善,主要是加强检察机关对行政机关证据收集和移送的监督。第四部分是行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中有效运用的配套制度和措施。通过提高行政机关的素质和取证工作能力、优化其取证方法以及建立行政机关证据认定机制来完善行政机关证据收集工作,建立行政机关与公安司法机关工作衔接机制以及推动行政机关与公安司法机关证据法律文书的统一化这几个方面来保证行政证据材料在刑事诉讼中有效的运用。
[Abstract]:China's administrative law enforcement and criminal justice convergence mechanisms have developed more mature, but there are few regulations on evidence convergence and weak theoretical research. The Supreme people's Court, the Supreme people's Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, The opinions of the Ministry of Justice on the Application of Law in handling Criminal cases of infringement of intellectual property Rights have, for the first time, stipulated the criminal evidence capacity of administrative evidence materials, but because of its low legal effect, It is difficult to play a role in judicial practice. The new Criminal procedure Law clearly stipulates that the evidential materials collected by administrative organs in the course of administrative law enforcement and investigation of cases may be used as evidence in criminal proceedings. This is a breakthrough in the development of the convergence mechanism between the two laws, but it may not be possible to achieve the desired effect by providing for the important issue of evidence convergence with only one clause. This article mainly uses classification, comparison, and interpretation of the law. The application of evidence materials collected by administrative organs in criminal proceedings is analyzed and expounded by means of empirical research and other methods. In the introduction part, the article mainly expounds the current situation of evidence convergence between administrative organs and criminal judicial organs. The background of Article 52 of the new Criminal procedure Law and the importance and novelty of studying this topic. The main content of the article is divided into four parts, the specific research ideas and design are as follows:. The first part is the research on the basic theory of the application of administrative evidence materials in criminal proceedings. This part first expounds the connotation of administrative evidence, and analyzes the difference between "evidence" and "evidence material". Then the author makes a comparative study on the administrative evidence and the criminal procedural evidence, summarizes their common points and differences, and finally analyzes the value of the administrative evidence in the criminal proceedings. The second part is to analyze the problems existing in the application of administrative evidence materials in criminal proceedings. First of all, it shows that the current legislation of our country is not perfect enough in the use of administrative evidence materials in criminal proceedings, and there are no clear provisions on many issues. In particular, there is a contradiction between the procedural provisions and the legal interpretations made by different departments on this issue. These problems will lead to the new regulation can not be well applied in judicial practice. Secondly, the problems that may arise in the implementation of the new regulations are analyzed and forecasted. The third part is the perfection of the application of administrative evidence materials in criminal proceedings. This part is the main part of the article. The first is the measures to be taken to solve the problems existing in the legislation: to make clear the types of administrative evidence that can be used in criminal proceedings, The specific procedure for the application of administrative evidence materials in criminal proceedings is stipulated, and the unification of legal interpretation is promoted. Secondly, the perfection of the problems that may exist in the implementation process of the new provisions, It is mainly to strengthen procuratorial organ to administrative Orgnaization evidence collection and transfer superintendence. The fourth part is the effective use of administrative evidence materials in criminal proceedings supporting systems and measures. By improving the quality of administrative organs and the ability to collect evidence, To optimize the methods of obtaining evidence and to establish a mechanism of evidence identification in administrative organs to improve the collection of evidence in administrative organs, In order to ensure the effective application of administrative evidence materials in criminal proceedings, we should establish a mechanism to link up the work of administrative organs and public security judicial organs and promote the unification of evidence legal documents between administrative organs and public security judicial organs.
【学位授予单位】：浙江工商大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】