提供第三方插件行为侵犯软件修改权的证成——以“间接正犯理论的私法构造”为视角

发布时间：2018-03-29 05:03

本文选题：提供第三方插件行为　切入点：软件修改权　出处：《社会科学》2017年12期

【摘要】：著作权合理使用制度在软件著作权保护领域延伸为软件的合法复制品所有人可以对软件进行必要的修改,但必要修改权的行使仅限于软件合法复制品所有人自身的使用行为。"向他人提供具有修改功能插件的行为"与"提供已利用插件进行修改的软件"一样均违背著作权合理使用制度的立法初衷,违背软件开发者的意愿且可能使之遭受重大损失,理应认定为侵权行为。现行司法实务认定提供第三方插件行为属于侵权行为时缺乏说理依据。将刑法学间接正犯理论予以私法构造构建"支配性侵权",可将"利用他人合法行为实施侵权"作为独立的侵权类型,能有效地为知识产权领域诸如提供第三方插件行为、提供影视资源以及百度文库等司法实务疑难问题的解决提供充分的说理依据,从而有效保障著作权人的合法权益。
[Abstract]:The system of fair use of copyright extends in the field of software copyright protection to allow the owner of legal copies of the software to make necessary modifications to the software, But the exercise of the right to necessary modifications is limited to the use of the owner of the legal copy of the software. "to provide others with a modified plug-in" and "to provide software that has been modified by the plug-in" are contrary to each other. The legislative intention of the system of rational use of copyright, Against the will of the software developer and possibly inflicting heavy losses on it, The current judicial practice that provides the third party plug-in acts belong to the infringement of the lack of reasonable basis. The indirect principal criminal law theory of private law construction of "dominant tort", can "benefit" Using the lawful act of others to commit infringement "as an independent type of infringement," It can effectively provide sufficient reasoning basis for the intellectual property field such as providing third party plug-in behavior, providing film and television resources and Baidu library and other judicial practical problems, so as to effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners.
【作者单位】：海南大学法学院;国家2011司法文明协同创新中心南方基地;
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】