论申请行为保全的条件

发布时间：2018-04-02 02:01

本文选题：行为保全　切入点：胜诉可能性　出处：《华南理工大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：民事诉讼作为人们解决民事纠纷的重要手段，具有权威性、强制性、终局性等优点。但是随着民事诉讼手段的广泛应用，民事诉讼“滞后性”的缺点也逐渐凸显。为了弥补民事诉讼的“滞后性”缺点，大多数国家都在民事诉讼法律中规定了保全制度，以满足在紧急情况下当事人的权利保护需求。保全制度由财产保全制度和行为保全制度共同组成。财产保全制度在我国民事诉讼法中已存在多年，但行为保全制度却迟迟未得到我国民事诉讼法的确认。虽然在我国的海事诉讼法和知识产权法领域，均已出现具有行为保全性质的禁令制度，但实践中仍存在大量的行为保全案件无法处理。终于在2012年我国民事诉讼法进行了新的修改，将行为保全制度纳入我国民事诉讼的范围。但是，与此同时我们也发现，新民事诉讼法对行为保全的规定非常简单，对行为保全制度适用中可能出现的众多细节问题并未涉及，相关司法解释也尚未出台。相比其他国家，我国的行为保全制度仍有较大的改进空间。特别是申请行为保全的条件，作为行为保全制度的核心问题，其完善与否与行为保全制度的整体适用息息相关。遗憾的是，我国新民事诉讼法对于申请行为保全的条件，规定也十分简略，仍存在不小的完善空间。基于此，，本文希望通过研究，发现新民事诉讼法对申请行为保全条件规定中存在的漏洞与不足，分析其在适用中可能面临的问题，并尝试提出一些解决建议。本文分为五个部分：第一部分首先对我国申请行为保全的条件进行制度考察。第二部分则是探讨行为保全条件设定的逻辑出发点。从第三部分开始，逐章分析我国行为保全的每一个申请条件，探讨行为保全申请条件中的争议问题以及关键点，先研究行为保全的前提条件，再分析行为保全的必要条件，最后探讨行为保全的担保条件。本文通过对申请行为保全的条件进行全面分析，希望对我国日后完善申请行为保全的条件提供一些有利的参考。
[Abstract]:As an important means to solve civil disputes, civil litigation has the advantages of authority, compulsion and finality.However, with the wide application of civil litigation means, the shortcomings of "lag" in civil litigation have been gradually highlighted.In order to make up for the "lag" of the civil action, most countries have stipulated the preservation system in the civil litigation law to meet the needs of the protection of the rights of the parties in the emergency situation.Preservation system consists of property preservation system and act preservation system.Property preservation system has existed in our civil procedure law for many years, but the behavior preservation system has not been confirmed by our civil procedure law.Although in the field of maritime procedural law and intellectual property law of our country, there has been a prohibition system with the nature of act preservation, but in practice there are still a large number of cases of act preservation that cannot be dealt with.Finally, in 2012, China's civil procedure law was revised to bring the act preservation system into the scope of our civil action.However, at the same time, we also find that the provisions of the new civil procedure law on the preservation of conduct is very simple, and many details that may arise in the application of the act preservation system have not been involved, and the relevant judicial interpretation has not yet been issued.Compared with other countries, there is still much room for improvement in our country's behavior preservation system.Especially, as the core issue of the behavior preservation system, the condition of application for act preservation is closely related to the whole application of the act preservation system.Unfortunately, the new civil procedure law has a very simple stipulation on the condition of the preservation of the application act, and there is still no small room for improvement.Based on this, this paper hopes to find out the loopholes and deficiencies in the provisions of the new civil procedure law on the preservation conditions of application, analyze the problems it may face in its application, and try to put forward some suggestions to solve the problems.This paper is divided into five parts: the first part is to investigate the condition of the preservation of the application act in our country.The second part is to explore the logical starting point of behavior preservation conditions.Beginning from the third part, chapter by chapter analyzes every application condition of behavior preservation in our country, discusses the dispute problem and key point in the condition of behavior preservation application, studies the premise condition of act preservation first, and then analyzes the necessary condition of act preservation.Finally, the article discusses the guarantee conditions of act preservation.Through the comprehensive analysis of the condition of the preservation of the application act, this paper hopes to provide some beneficial reference for our country to perfect the condition of the preservation of the application act in the future.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】