论知识产权保护的慎刑原则

发布时间：2018-04-02 21:49

本文选题：知识产权　切入点：刑法　出处：《南昌大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：用刑法手段保护知识产权是知识产权制度的普遍作法，我国亦不例外。我国目前的知识产权刑事立法无论是犯罪圈之大，还是课刑的严厉程度，都已经达到世界“领先”水平，立法者试图以此种手段打击当时所面临的严重的侵犯知识产权现象，同时为中国加入WTO提供良好的法律环境和中国保护知识产权的良好国际形象。经历十几年知识产权立法、执法、司法的完善，中国知识产权保护状况已经得到了明显改善，严重的大规模侵犯知识产权的现象很少发生。伴随着中国法制理念的更新和世界范围内知识产权的轻刑化趋势，从刑法谦抑性精神出发，尊重知识产权的私权属性，减少国家对于私权的主动干预，从我国国情考虑，设定科学合理的知识产权保护目标，慎用刑法介入知识产权的保护范围，在刑事制度上尽量以慎刑、轻刑、非自由刑为知识产权刑事立法的指导思想，有必要考虑我国现行刑法规定的罪名存在的价值及合理性，从立法的角度调整权利保护与社会公众利益的平衡关系。同时，对于知识产权犯罪案件的刑事程序提起、刑事证据的运用等均应当重新检讨与完善，，保障审判的准确和程序的科学合理。不应当一味强调以扩大打击面、严刑的手段保护知识产权，尤其在知识产权刑事立法和司法时要避免陷入国际化等错误的指导思路中。
[Abstract]:The protection of intellectual property by means of criminal law is a common practice in intellectual property system, and China is no exception.The current criminal legislation on intellectual property in our country, regardless of the crime circle or the severity of the punishment, has reached the "leading level" in the world. Legislators tried to crack down on the serious intellectual property infringement phenomenon that they faced at that time.At the same time for China to join the WTO to provide a good legal environment and China to protect intellectual property rights a good international image.After more than ten years of intellectual property legislation, law enforcement, judicial perfection, China's intellectual property protection situation has been significantly improved, serious large-scale violations of intellectual property rights rarely occur.With the renewal of China's legal system concept and the tendency of light punishment of intellectual property rights in the world, from the view of the modesty spirit of criminal law, respecting the private rights attribute of intellectual property rights and reducing the state's active interference in private rights, we should consider the situation of our country.Setting a scientific and reasonable goal of intellectual property protection, carefully using criminal law to intervene in the scope of protection of intellectual property, and trying to use careful punishment, light punishment and non-free punishment as the guiding ideology of criminal legislation of intellectual property rights in the criminal system.It is necessary to consider the value and rationality of the existing charges under the current criminal law of our country, and adjust the balance between the protection of rights and the public interests from the angle of legislation.At the same time, the criminal procedure and the use of criminal evidence should be reviewed and perfected to ensure the accuracy of the trial and the scientific and reasonable procedure.We should not blindly emphasize the protection of intellectual property rights by means of expanding the scope of attack and severely punishing intellectual property, especially in the criminal legislation and judicature of intellectual property rights, to avoid falling into the wrong guiding ideas such as internationalization.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D924.3;D923.42

【共引文献】