论专利被许可人利益保护
发布时间:2018-04-03 08:24
本文选题:专利许可 切入点:专利被许可人 出处:《西南政法大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:作为专利技术交易的主要形式之一,专利许可已经逐渐成为实现专利商业化、产业化的重要方式。在专利许可中,一方面,专利权人将其独占享有的专利实施权授予被许可人,自然有权利要求被许可人支付一定的对价,并就专利技术的实施设定相关的条件。另一方面,,专利被许可人在支付相应对价的情况下,同样应当从专利许可中获得合理收益,这种收益既取决于专利技术实施的效果,也取决于向专利权人支付的许可对价和事先设定的许可条件。然而,在专利许可交易过程中,专利许可人并没有尊重被许可人获得合理收益的权利,反而利用其强势地位,损害被许可人的利益。专利被许可人利益保护的缺失,不单会影响市场公平竞争,而且也会阻碍我国经济对外交往。为此,我国需改善专利被许可人的弱势地位,进一步完善知识产权法和反垄断法的相关规定,设立专利无效宣告中的提存条款,建立类似物权的专利被许可人保护和诉权约定制度。 论文主要运用了比较研究的方法,通过对部分国家、地区的法律制度进行比较,结合实证分析的方法,试图把专利被许可人置于个人利益、社会公共利益的两端来衡量权利保护。论文分五个部分,引言部分简要概述了专利实施许可在专利商业化、产业化过程中的重要作用。谈到专利被许可人在专利技术交易中的劣势及对被许可利益保护的意义。第一部分,通过将专利实施许可与其他知识产权许可比较,突显出专利实施许可合同的特点,并对专利许可合同条款进行了重点阐释,引出专利许可合同的契约自由与限制。从专利许可的理论基础着手,根据专利的原则及利益平衡理论指明专利被许可人利益保护的方向。第二部分,重点关注专利被许可人的地位。说明了保护专利被许可人的必要性,特别是基于我国国情,急需加强专利被许可人权利保护。结合专利被许可人的实证分析,指出了专利技术交易中对专利被许可人权利的具体影响。第三部分综述了美国、日本、欧盟和台湾地区对专利被许可人的相关规定,并在立法模式和认定标准等方面进行了比较分析。第四部分从我国现行国内法分析,提出了对完善专利被许可人权利保护的思考,建议我国进一步完善知识产权法和反垄断法的相关规定,设立专利无效宣告中的提存条款,建立类似物权的专利被许可人保护制度。
[Abstract]:As one of the main forms of patent technology transaction, patent license has gradually become an important way to realize the commercialization and industrialization of patent.In the patent license, on the one hand, the patentee grants the licensee the exclusive right to execute the patent, and naturally has the right to ask the licensee to pay a certain amount of consideration, and to set the relevant conditions for the implementation of the patent technology.On the other hand, if the licensee pays the corresponding consideration, he should also obtain a reasonable profit from the patent license, which depends on the effect of the implementation of the patent technology,It also depends on the consideration paid to the patentee and the pre-set conditions of the licence.However, in the course of patent licensing transaction, the patent licensor does not respect the licensee's right to obtain reasonable income. Instead, he takes advantage of his strong position to harm the licensee's interests.The lack of protection of patent licensee's interests will not only affect the fair competition of the market, but also hinder China's economic exchanges with foreign countries.Therefore, China needs to improve the weak position of patent licensees, further improve the relevant provisions of intellectual property law and anti-monopoly law, and set up the deposit clause in the invalidation of patent.Establish the patent licensee protection and litigation agreement system similar to real right.By comparing the legal systems of some countries and regions and combining the method of empirical analysis, the thesis tries to put the patent licensee in the personal interest.The protection of rights is measured at both ends of the public interest.The paper is divided into five parts. The introduction briefly summarizes the important role of patent license in the process of patent commercialization and industrialization.Discusses the patent licensee's disadvantage in the patent technology transaction and the significance to the license interest protection.In the first part, by comparing the patent license with other intellectual property licenses, it highlights the characteristics of the patent license contract, explains the terms of the patent license contract, and leads to the freedom and limitation of the patent license contract.Starting from the theoretical basis of patent licensing, this paper points out the direction of protecting the interests of patent licensees according to the principle of patent and the theory of balance of interests.The second part focuses on the status of patent licensees.It explains the necessity of protecting patent licensees, especially on the basis of our country's national conditions, so it is urgent to strengthen the protection of patent licensees' rights.Based on the empirical analysis of patent licensees, this paper points out the specific influence of patent technology transaction on the rights of patent licensees.The third part summarizes the relevant regulations of patent licensees in the United States, Japan, EU and Taiwan, and makes a comparative analysis on the legislative model and the standards of the patent licensees.The fourth part analyzes the current domestic law of our country, puts forward some thoughts on perfecting the protection of the rights of patent licensees, and suggests that our country should further perfect the relevant provisions of intellectual property law and anti-monopoly law, and set up the deposit clause in the invalidation of patent.Establish a patent licensee protection system similar to real right.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 王宏芹;;专利被许可人的起诉权初探[J];安徽教育学院学报;2006年05期
2 周敏;李玉洁;易波;;论专利实施许可下被许可人的诉讼资格[J];昌吉学院学报;2006年02期
3 尹田;论物权与知识产权的关系[J];法商研究;2002年05期
4 胡昂;;Lear案之后的法律思考[J];法制与社会;2013年14期
5 梁祺;;专利许可企业破产时完善专利许可制度研究[J];科技管理研究;2010年10期
6 孟雁北;拒绝交易权的限制问题研究[J];广东商学院学报;2005年01期
7 张耕;试论知识产权被许可人的诉讼地位[J];特区经济;2005年04期
本文编号:1704391
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1704391.html