发明专利创造性判断研究

发布时间：2018-04-12 00:09

本文选题：发明专利的创造性 + 本领域技术人员　；参考：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：一个国家的知识产权的发展水平是衡量一个国家科技发展水平的重要体现。发明专利作为知识产权领域的重要组成部分,提高发明专利的授权质量,是解决我国知识产权领域目前为止所存在的“专利数量大,但专利质量低”的问题的有效途径。在发明专利的实质审查中,新颖性和实用性是客观判断标准,对于专利从业人员是较为容易把握的,而创造性则具有很强的主观性,因此,把握了发明专利的创造性判断,就能够提高发明专利的授权标准。首先,通过案例分析的方法,介绍发明专利创造性制度的发展及其判断方法,不仅包括我国发明专利的创造性制度的发展沿革,还从美国、欧洲、日本等国的角度,以发明专利的创造性在世界范围内的起源及发展过程,来达到充分理解该制度的重要性和必然性,同时能够审视发明专利创造性判断这一制度在历史发展过程中的可取之处。其次,对于典型的案例,以“案例-小结-案例评析”的形式,从“本领域技术人员”、“现有技术”、“区别技术特征”、“非显而易见性”、“显著的进步”这五个因素对发明专利创造性判断过程中存在的问题进行了剖析,生动易懂地阐述了以上各要素在创造性判断中的重要作用、以及实际工作过程中所存在的问题等,从而提出各方面的建议,以完善我国发明专利创造性的判断现状。最后,针对典型案例所呈现的问题,对我国发明专利的创造性判断相应地提出完善建议,得出最终结论。主要包括以下内容:完善发明专利创造性判断的主体条件,例如定期更新本领域技术人员的知识和能力的定义,立法明确规定本领域技术人员的创造力,加大专利复合型人才的培养力度;与“区别技术特征”相结合、重视“解决的技术问题”的应用;保证申请时提出的现有技术和技术问题的准确性;发明专利创造性判断过程中使用的概念和术语应当明确化;定期发布发明专利创造性判断的指导案例。通过上述案例分析和完善建议,期望能够提高我国发明专利的授权水平,改善我国目前专利质量不高的现状。
[Abstract]:The development level of intellectual property right of a country is an important embodiment of measuring the level of science and technology development of a country.As an important part of the field of intellectual property rights, it is an effective way to improve the quality of patent authorization in the field of intellectual property rights in our country. So far, the problem of "large number of patents but low quality of patents" in the field of intellectual property rights in China is solved.In the examination of the essence of invention patent, novelty and practicability are objective judgment standards, which are easy to grasp for patent practitioners, while creativity is very subjective. Therefore, it grasps the creative judgment of invention patent.It can improve the licensing standards of invention patents.First of all, through the method of case analysis, this paper introduces the development of the creative system of invention patent and its judgment method, including not only the development and evolution of the creative system of invention patent in China, but also from the perspective of the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries.In order to fully understand the importance and inevitability of the invention patent creativity in the world, we can fully understand the importance and inevitability of the system, and at the same time, we can examine the merit of this system in the process of historical development.Secondly, for typical cases, in the form of "case-summary-case analysis", from "technical personnel in the field", "existing technology", "distinguishing technical characteristics", "non-obvious",The five factors of "remarkable progress" have analyzed the problems existing in the process of the creative judgment of invention patent, and vividly and easily explained the important role of the above factors in the creative judgment.And the existing problems in the process of practical work, so as to put forward suggestions in various aspects, in order to improve the status quo of the judgement of invention patent creativity in China.Finally, in view of the problems presented in typical cases, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve the creative judgment of Chinese invention patent and draws the final conclusion.It mainly includes the following contents: perfecting the subject condition of the creative judgment of invention patent, for example, regularly updating the definition of the knowledge and ability of the technical personnel in this field, and legislating explicitly the creativity of the technical personnel in the field.Strengthen the training of patent compound talents, combine with "distinguishing technical characteristics", attach importance to the application of "solved technical problems", ensure the accuracy of existing technology and technical problems when applying for the patent;The concepts and terms used in the creative judgment of invention patent should be clearly defined, and the guiding cases of the creative judgment of invention patent should be published regularly.Through the analysis of the above cases and the perfect suggestions, it is expected that the licensing level of the invention patent in China can be improved, and the present situation of the patent quality is not high in our country.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G306

【参考文献】