知识产权客体新论

发布时间：2018-04-12 11:02

本文选题：知识产权 + 客体　；参考：《扬州大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：知识产权的客体,是知识产权领域的一个基础理论问题。知识产权法律关系有三个要素,即主体、客体与内容。这三个要素是知识产权法律关系发生、变更与消灭的必备要素,缺一不可。而知识产权客体涉及到知识产权法律关系中的一个重要方面,对知识产权客体的阐明与界定,对于我们准确而全面的理解与把握知识产权法律关系以及知识产权法律制度具有重要意义。我国目前学术界对知识产权客体的认识众说纷纭：传统民法理论的“智力成果说”,以吴汉东、闵锋、张和生等为代表的“知识产品说”,以郑成思、张玉敏、张勤等为代表的“信息说”,以刘春田为代表的“行为说”,以及新萌生的“多重构造体系说”等。每个学说都有其学术价值,但也存在不足。本文旨在通过对知识产权各个理论学说的详尽分析,并通过实际案例的说明,意在提出新的知识产权客体制度的构建以及其制度构建的必要性。本文试图从辩证的角度分析各个学说的价值与不足,经过辩证分析,我们认为知识产权客体具有两层顺位,第一顺位的固有客体为知识财产和人身利益,第二顺位的派生客体为知识产权法律关系处于不稳定状态时(如当知识产权处于市场流通的交易状态时或者当知识产权被侵犯时)的停止侵害、赔偿损失等给付行为或者消除影响、赔礼道歉的行为。进一步阐述将知识产权客体制度写入法律具有重要意义,一方面有利于实现“经济利益最大化”,最大限度实现知识财产的财产价值,这种经济利益最大化可以变成一种对创作的激励,知识财产的积累导致社会财富的积累,而社会财富的积累正是实现社会进步与发展的直接原因；另一方面构建知识产权客体制度并在法律中予以规定,有利于从根本上保护知识产权主体的合法权利,这也是激励制度能够得以实现的必要条件。第一部分阐述的是知识产权客体概念的界定。知识产权客体与知识产权法律制度的关系是非常紧密的,知识产权客体制约着知识产权法律制度的发展,随着客体的不断更新与变化,法律制度也在不断进步与完善,对知识产权客体的界定十分必要。知识产权的客体应当包含经过法律确认和保护的能够满足知识产权主体的精神利益和物质需要的非物质财富。第二部分阐述的是知识产权客体的代表性学说的综述与评析,从哲学角度和历史学角度分析了知识产权客体学说在学界未能统一的原因。详细论述与剖析了传统民法理论的“智力成果说”,以吴汉东、闵锋、张和生等为代表的“知识产品说”,以郑成思、张玉敏、张勤等为代表的“信息说”,以刘春田为代表的“行为说”,以及新萌生的“多重构造体系说”。第三部分阐述的是知识产权客体的基础理论与结构体系。本文将知识产权的客体分为固有客体与派生客体两个顺位,第一顺位的客体为固有客体,包括知识财产和人身利益,固有客体为静态层面的客体；第二顺位的客体为派生客体,是停止侵害、给付、消除影响、赔礼道歉的行为,派生客体为动态层面的客体。第四部分阐述的是知识产权客体更为有效的制度创新,知识产权法律制度的构建,一方面要在保护知识财产安全性的基础上兼顾人身利益,另一方面要在保护固有客体安全性的基础上保护派生客体的救济可行性。知识产权法律制度的构建有利于最大限度实现知识财产的财产价值,也有利于从根本上保护权利主体的合法权利。
[Abstract]:The object of intellectual property, is a basic theoretical problem in the field of intellectual property. The intellectual property law has three elements, namely subject, object and content. These three elements are the occurrence of intellectual property law, essential elements, change and eradication are indispensable. And the object of intellectual property involves an important aspect of intellectual property rights in the legal relationship, to clarify and define the object of intellectual property rights, has important meaning for us to accurately understand and grasp the intellectual property law and the legal system of intellectual property rights. The current academic awareness of intellectual property rights object: Public opinions are divergent. traditional civil law theory of "intellectual", by Wu Handong Min Feng. Zhang Hesheng, as the representative of the "knowledge products", by Zheng Chengsi, Zhang Yumin, Zhang Qin as the representative of the "information", with Liu Chuntian as the representative of the "behavior", and The initiation of the new "multiple tectonic system". Each theory has its academic value, but also has some disadvantages. This paper aims at analyzing the theory of intellectual property rights of all, and through the actual case, to construct the necessity of constructing the system and to put forward the new object of intellectual property system.
This article from the perspective of dialectical analysis of various theories of value and shortcomings, through dialectical analysis, we think that the object of intellectual property has two layers of CIS, cis position for the first natural object of intellectual property and personal interests, second bits in a derived object of the intellectual property law of unstable state (such as intellectual property in the market transaction status or when infringing intellectual property rights) when the cessation of the infringement, damages and other payments or eliminate the effects of apology behavior. Further elaboration will play an important role in the system of intellectual property rights in the law, on the one hand, is conducive to the realization of the maximum economic benefits, to maximize the value of intellectual property the property, to maximize the economic benefits can become a creation of the incentive, intellectual property accumulation leads to the accumulation of social wealth, and social wealth accumulation Fatigue is the direct cause of social progress and development. On the other hand, the construction of the object system of intellectual property and the stipulation in law are conducive to fundamentally protect the legitimate rights of the intellectual property owners, which is a necessary condition for the incentive system to be realized.
The first part is the definition of the object of intellectual property. The relationship between the object of intellectual property and intellectual property legal system is very close, the object of intellectual property restricts the development of the legal system of intellectual property rights, with the updating of object and the change of the legal system is also in progress and improvement, it is necessary to define the object of intellectual property rights. The object of intellectual property should be included after the legal recognition and protection of intellectual property rights to meet the spirit of the main interests and material needs of the intangible wealth.
The second part is the summary of representative theories and Analysis on the object of intellectual property, from the angle of philosophy and history analysis theory of the object of intellectual property in academe did not unified. Detailed discussion and analysis of the traditional civil law theory of "intellectual achievements" in Wu Han Dong, min Feng, Zhang Hesheng as the representative of the "knowledge products", by Zheng Chengsi, Zhang Yumin, Zhang Qin as the representative of the "information", with Liu Chuntian as the representative of the "behavior", and the initiation of the "multiple tectonic system".
The third part is the basic theory of structural system and object of intellectual property rights. This will be the object of intellectual property is divided into natural objects and derived object of the two cis position, the first priority of the object as natural object, including intellectual property and personal interests, the inherent object as the object of the static level; the second place for the object the derived object is to stop the infringement, eliminating the effects of payment, the apology behavior derived object as the object dynamic level.
The fourth part is the object of intellectual property is more effective institutional innovation, constructing the legal system of intellectual property rights, on the one hand, to take into account personal interests based on the protection of intellectual property security, on the other hand to protect the object of relief derived feasibility in the foundation for the protection of the security of the natural object. The construction of intellectual property law the system has to achieve the maximum value of intellectual property assets, but also conducive to fundamentally protect the legitimate rights of the subject of right.

【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】