知识产权制度功能的重读与澄清——对“鼓励创造说”的检讨与批判

发布时间：2018-04-17 08:29

本文选题：知识产权 + 制度功能　；参考：《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：知识产权能够鼓励创造系知识产权制度功能的通常解说,该说法及其依据的历史素材之间存在循环论证的嫌疑。事实上,经由不同价值导向进行的历史阐释呈现出更加丰富的知识产权制度发展历程,揭示出鼓励创造说极有可能是一种倒果为因的立法策略。横向比较古代中国知识产权制度萌芽及受阻的过程,将发现强大的利益诉求与社会认可而非鼓励创造的期待是形成知识产权制度的重要原因,进而澄清制度功能并非价值诠释,而是事实描述这一基本问题。知识产权最重要的制度功能在于为作品、发明、商标这些信息提供市场化的制度环境,在不同的社会主体之间分配基于这些信息产生的利益。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property can encourage the creation of a general explanation of the functions of the intellectual property system, and there is a suspicion of circular argumentation between this statement and the historical material on which it is based.As a matter of fact, the historical interpretation through different value orientation presents a richer course of development of intellectual property system, which reveals that encouraging the creation theory is probably a kind of legislative strategy of reversing the result and the cause.Comparing the process of germination and hindrance of intellectual property system in ancient China, it will be found that strong interest demand and social recognition rather than expectation of encouraging creation are the important reasons for the formation of intellectual property system, and then clarify that the function of the system is not a value annotation.It is a factual description of the basic question.The most important institutional function of intellectual property is to provide a market-oriented institutional environment for the information of works, inventions and trademarks, and to distribute the benefits arising from these information among different social subjects.
【作者单位】：重庆大学法学院;
【基金】：重庆市社会科学规划博士项目“移动互联网环境下的版权保护研究”(2015BS046) 中央高校基本科研业务费(106112016CDJSK080001)
【分类号】：D956.1;DD913

【相似文献】