商标注册侵犯在先权利问题研究

发布时间:2018-04-20 03:22

  本文选题:在先权利 + 定义 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文


【摘要】:知识产权作为一种无形知产,其价值逐渐增大,并且受到社会的广泛关注。由此,也产生了一些权利冲突的状况。商标权与其他在先权利的冲突就是较为具有代表性的一种冲突。我国《商标法》第9条、第31条都规定商标注册不得侵犯他人的在先权利。 第一章主要介绍了关于在先权利的定义及特征、范围,并对在先权利进行了分类。在先权利就是在注册商标申请日或优先权日前,已经合法有效存在的,可以对抗在后权利,禁止在后商标权产生的民事权利。在先权利必须具有的三个特征就是:时间的在先行;冲突的可能性;权利对抗的相对性。只有符合这三个特征才是商标法所称的在先权利。在现实生活中,可能成为在先权利主要有三类:第一类是标记性权利,主要有在先商标权、商号权等;第二类是其他知识产权,主要有著作权、外观设计专利权。第三类是其他的民事权利,主要有姓名权、肖像权等。 第二章论述了认定申请注册的商标是否侵犯在先权利的标准。其中标记类权利需要考虑的是标准就是混淆。其他民事权利也需要考虑混淆情况,但两个混淆产生的基础不同,标记类权利是如果该商标被注册会产生混淆,而其他民事权利探讨的重点是因为权利本身不具有排他性,基于此使用该权利也会造成的混淆。其他的知识产权是无需考虑混淆的情形的,但难点在于提供证据证明权利的存在,尤其是对于著作权的认定。在实践中,著作权的认定主要有以下的方式:生效的判决书;版权登记证明;已发表情况等。 第三章论述我国现有的商标注册侵犯在先权利的方式。主要是公告期内的异议和五年内的撤销权。但现有方式有很多的不足,主要是没有解决未注册成功的侵权问题;撤销权缺少明知或者应知的要素;主观要件的区分不合理。 第四章论述商标注册侵犯在先权利的解决方式。根据商标是否被核准注册分为两种情况来探讨解决方式。一类是未被注册成功的情况下,在此基础上根据上文的分类,探讨不同类型权利受侵害和解决的方式。第二类是商标注册成功,被授予商标权。此时需要根据在先权利撤销该商标权。在善意的情况下需要遵循以下三个原则:尊重在先权利、效率原则和权利失效原则。这三个原则也有其适用顺序的。首先应该尊重在先权利,在此基础上,如果该商标的价值远远高于在先权利本身,应遵循效率的原则,,并不应该一概撤销在先权利。在此情况下应该支付在先权利人一定的许可费用,该费用应该至少是同类权利许可费用的2倍。权利时效原则是一个例外原则,如果权利人在明知权利受侵害并且默认该侵害五年的时间,则视为权利人默许商标权人的使用。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property as an intangible property, its value increases gradually, and is widely concerned by the society. As a result, there are also some conflicts of rights. The conflict between trademark right and other prior rights is a more representative conflict. Articles 9 and 31 of our Trademark Law stipulate that trademark registration shall not infringe upon the prior rights of others. The first chapter mainly introduces the definition, characteristics and scope of prior rights, and classifies them. The prior right is a civil right that exists legally and effectively before the date of filing for a registered trademark or the date of priority, and can counteract the post-right and prohibit the civil rights arising from the post-trademark right. The first rights must have three characteristics: the time in advance, the possibility of conflict, and the relativity of right confrontation. Only in accordance with these three characteristics is the trademark law as a priori right. In real life, there are three kinds of possible rights: the first kind is marked right, mainly has the trademark right, the trade name right and so on; the second kind is the other intellectual property right, mainly has the copyright, the appearance design patent right. The third category is other civil rights, mainly the right to a name, the right to portrait, and so on. The second chapter discusses the criteria for determining whether the trademark applied for registration infringes the prior right. Among them mark class right needs to consider is standard is confused. Other civil rights also need to be considered for confusion, but the basis for the two confuses is different. The tagging right is confusing if the trademark is registered, while other civil rights are concerned with the fact that the rights themselves are not exclusive. The use of this right based on this would also create confusion. Other intellectual property rights do not need to consider the confusion, but the difficulty is to provide evidence to prove the existence of rights, especially for copyright recognition. In practice, the main ways to identify copyright are as follows: effective judgment, copyright registration certificate, published situation and so on. The third chapter discusses the way of trademark registration in China. It is the objection of announcement period and the right of rescission within five years. However, there are many shortcomings in the existing methods, mainly the failure to solve the problem of unregistered infringement; the lack of knowledge or knowledge of the right of rescission; the unreasonable distinction between subjective elements. The fourth chapter discusses the solution of trademark registration infringing on the prior right. According to whether the trademark is approved registration is divided into two situations to explore the solution. On the basis of the above classification, this paper discusses the ways of infringement and solution of different types of rights in the absence of successful registration. The second category is the successful registration of trademarks and the granting of trademark rights. It is necessary to revoke the trademark right according to the prior right. In good faith, the following three principles should be followed: respecting prior rights, efficiency and invalidation of rights. These three principles also have their order of application. On the basis of this, if the value of the trademark is much higher than the prior right itself, the principle of efficiency should be followed, and the prior right should not be revoked altogether. In this case, a certain licence fee shall be paid to the prior right holder, which shall be at least twice the cost of the same right licence. The principle of limitation of rights is an exceptional principle. If the obligee is aware of the infringement and acquiesces to the infringement for five years, the obligee acquiesces to the use of the trademark owner.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.43

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前2条

1 汪正;;“鸭王”商标确权案:保护在先权利要与维护市场秩序相协调[J];中华商标;2011年03期

2 郑曦;;对商标法上在先权利的概念及特征的探析[J];知识经济;2011年06期



本文编号:1776026

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1776026.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户fa57e***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com