我国著作权质押法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-21 22:23

本文选题：著作权质押 + 质押标的　；参考：《辽宁大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：智力成果自受到法律保护以来,特别是在第二次世界大战之后,知识产权等无形财产的重要性已日益凸显,其财产价值连年攀升。随着全球金融危机的爆发,土地、住房和其它有形担保物的王者地位发生改变,金融机构正在探索新的信贷方式,企业也亟待寻求别样融资渠道,因而富含经济价值的知识产权便成为这种探求的对接点。如何最大限度地利用知识产权的价值,实现从静态管理到动态利用的质的飞跃,成为一个国家提升创新能力和核心竞争力的重要因素。实践表明,知识产权担保已成为经济活动的必然选择。作为知识产权领域三大支柱之一的著作权,与专利权和商标权相比,具备更多的文化价值,为推动文化的发展和繁荣提供不竭的动力。同时,著作权还是文化价值利益化的体现,兼具财产属性中的可使用性和可交换性。而著作权质押则是彰显其经济属性的最有力的方式之一,是著作权价值性利用的典型代表。它不仅是著作权人对著作权加以利用的重要方式,也是其进行担保融资的有效手段。近年来,由于著作权质押融资活动逐年增多,相应的理论探讨也随之增加。然而,基于著作权区别于有体物担保的特性,加之理论研究不足、制度规范阙如等原因,著作权质押依然举步维艰。其中著作权质押中的法律问题集中体现在质押标的范围、登记效力、权利冲突以及质权人权利保护方面。本文以担保物权基本理论为基础,由权利质权的性质和具体适用规则延伸到著作权质押规则,结合著作权本身的特性和特有价值并借鉴国外立法经验,针对著作权质押中存在的问题,提出个人的见解以及完善建议。包括目前立法中并未提及,但是在近年来,知识产权质押融资实践中大量产生的未来作品版权是否能成为质押标的的问题,建议将未来作品著作权纳入质押标的范围,并且设立预告质押制度以及运用著作权打包组合质押的形式保障质权人实现质权;分析著作人身权与财产权相冲突的现状,提出采用许可使用和默示推定并举的方式限制著作人身权;主张著作权质押登记的效力应该采取登记对抗主义,提高交易效率;在著作权质押双方权利义务方面,提出废除质权人同意权,并赋予出质人以重复质押权以平衡双方的利益关系,最大限度的促进著作权经济价值的实现。
[Abstract]:Since intellectual achievements have been protected by law, especially after the second World War, the importance of intellectual property and other intangible property has become increasingly prominent, and the value of intellectual property has been rising year after year. With the outbreak of the global financial crisis, land, housing and other tangible collateral status has changed, financial institutions are exploring new forms of credit, and enterprises are looking for alternative financing channels. Thus the intellectual property, which is rich in economic value, becomes the docking point of this exploration. How to maximize the value of intellectual property and realize the qualitative leap from static management to dynamic utilization has become an important factor for a country to enhance its innovation ability and core competitiveness. Practice shows that intellectual property guarantee has become the inevitable choice of economic activities. As one of the three pillars in the field of intellectual property, copyright has more cultural value than patent rights and trademark rights, and provides an inexhaustible power for promoting the development and prosperity of culture. At the same time, copyright is the embodiment of the benefit of cultural value. The pledge of copyright is one of the most powerful ways to show its economic attribute, and it is a typical representative of the use of copyright value. It is not only an important way for copyright owners to make use of copyright, but also an effective means to guarantee financing. In recent years, as the financing of copyright pledge increases year by year, the corresponding theoretical discussion also increases. However, due to the difference between copyright and physical security, the lack of theoretical research and the lack of institutional norms, the pledge of copyright is still difficult. The legal problems in copyright pledge are embodied in the scope of pledge object, registration effectiveness, conflict of rights and the protection of the rights of the mortgagee. Based on the basic theory of security right, this paper extends from the nature and specific applicable rules of pledge of rights to the rules of copyright pledge, combines the characteristics and unique value of copyright and draws lessons from foreign legislative experience. In view of the existing problems in copyright pledge, this paper puts forward personal opinions and suggestions for perfection. Including not mentioned in the current legislation, but in recent years, whether the copyright of future works produced in large quantities in the practice of intellectual property pledge financing can be the subject of pledge, it is suggested that the copyright of future works be included in the scope of pledge subject. And set up the system of prenotice pledge and use the form of the copyright package combination pledge to protect the mortgagee to realize the pledge, and analyze the current situation of the conflict between the personal right and the property right of the author, It is proposed to restrict the personal rights of the author by means of both licensing and implied presumption; to advocate that the registration of copyright pledge should be effective against registration and to improve the efficiency of transactions; and that, in terms of the rights and obligations of both parties to copyright pledge, This paper proposes to abolish the right of consent of the licensor and to endow the mortgagee with the right of repeated pledge in order to balance the interests of both parties and to promote the realization of the economic value of copyright to the maximum extent.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】