工业品外观设计著作权与专利权保护冲突研究

发布时间：2018-05-06 07:47

本文选题：工业品外观设计 + 著作权　；参考：《湘潭大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：在这个“设计创造财富”的时代，产品的外观设计最直观、具体、贴近广大消费者和企业。消费者越来越追求美和个性，促使外观设计成为其购买产品的决定性因素，从而是实现产品的价值、占领市场的决定性因素。又由于外观设计获得保护的程序简单、成本投入较低，维护成本低廉更加贴切商品经济时代产品更新速度快的特点，各个国家无不将其作为重要的国家发展战略。但是工业品外观设计兼跨艺术和产业两大领域，它既属于工业产品的新设计，能够受到专利法的保护；同时它是设计师具有独创性的智力成果，可以得到著作权法的保护。外观设计介于专利权和著作权之间，两个独立领域在实践中产生了交叉。而我国知识产权法律体系，似乎面面俱到，实则细密不足，，疏阔有余。加之法官之间、法院之间、法院与专利复审委之间、官方与学者间对于外观设计专利法的理解不同，造成同类案件，法律适用的结果迥异，而其中也暴露出我们目前司法中所面临的问题。本文共分六个章节，第一部分为绪论部分。第二部分从工业品外观设计的司法典型案例中，分析工业品外观设计的司法现状，从中剖析出司法实践中所碰到的难题。第三部分：阐述了工业品外观设计概念法律化过程，以及工业品外观设计的概念、以及其与美术作品、实用艺术作品之间的关系。第四部分：是本文的重点章节，从理论和现实的角度对工业品外观设计专利法与著作权法重合的情形进行了分类，然后从理论的角度出发，分析工业品外观设计的新颖性标准与著作权的独创性标准的不同，从外观设计产品是不是著作权作品的复制的角度，探讨著作权法保护与专利法保护客体的重合。第五部分：对国外关于工业品外观设计保护制度的介绍与评介。第六部分：对于现行机制下所产生的问题，进行工业品外观设计单纯立法的可行性进行了否定，然后通过对工业品外观设计与著作权重合的不同情形采取了不同的保护模式，对完善现行解决机制提出一点自己的见解。
[Abstract]:In this "design to create wealth" era, product design is the most intuitive, specific, close to the majority of consumers and enterprises. Consumers are more and more pursuing beauty and personality, which makes appearance design become the decisive factor for them to buy products, which is the decisive factor to realize the value of products and occupy the market. Because of the simple procedure of protecting appearance design, low cost, low maintenance cost and fast updating speed of products in the age of commodity economy, every country regards it as an important national development strategy. However, industrial appearance design is not only a new design of industrial products and can be protected by patent law, but also a creative intellectual achievement of designers, which can be protected by copyright law. The design is between patent and copyright, and the two independent fields are intersected in practice. But our country intellectual property law system, seems to have all sides, in fact is detailed insufficient, sparse has more than. In addition, there are different understandings of the design patent law between the judges, the courts, the courts and the Patent Review Board, and between the officials and the scholars, resulting in different results of the application of the law in similar cases. And also exposed our current problems in the administration of justice. This paper is divided into six chapters, the first part is the introduction. The second part analyzes the judicial status of industrial design from the typical cases of industrial design, from which the problems encountered in judicial practice are analyzed. The third part: elaborated the industrial product appearance design concept legal process, as well as the industrial product appearance design concept, as well as its and the fine arts work, the practical art work relations. The fourth part: this article is the key chapter, from the theory and the reality angle, has carried on the classification to the industrial product appearance design patent law and the copyright law superposition, then from the theory angle, This paper analyzes the difference between the novelty standard of industrial design and the originality standard of copyright, and discusses the coincidence between copyright law protection and patent law protection object from the point of view of whether the design product is a copy of copyright work. Part V: introduction and review on the protection system of industrial design abroad. The sixth part: for the problems arising under the current mechanism, the feasibility of pure legislation of industrial product design is negated, and then different protection modes are adopted through the different cases of industrial design and copyright coincidence. To perfect the present solution mechanism puts forward own opinion.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】