韩寒诉百度文库侵权案评析
发布时间:2018-05-06 09:47
本文选题:网络版权纠纷 + 著作权 ; 参考:《湖南大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:互联网的迅猛发展,对社会生活的方方面面产生了巨大影响。随着互联网的普及,上载、下载文件、图片、软件等变得越来越来容易。网络对政府控制信息复制与传播的法律,特别是著作权法,提出了严峻的挑战,人们越来越关注著作权法如何适应互联网的发展。特别是近年来,国内网络侵权纠纷案件层出不穷,使得网络版权保护逐渐成为一个突出的问题。其中,百度文库侵权案件一度成为网络热点事件,引起了业内外的广泛关注,百度文库和著作权人双方各执一词,难分高下,如何认定和保护网络知识产权再次成为人们关注的焦点。通过韩寒诉百度文库侵权一案,分析百度文库文档分享平台存在的侵权现象,对网络服务提供者的著作权侵权责任进行探讨,探寻我国法律对信息网络传播权的系统保护,以更好地保护著作权人的合法权益和网络服务提供者的利益,促进我国互联网的健康发展。 首先,通过结合案情及法院判决结果,提炼出两个争议焦点:第一,百度文库的身份确定,其性质是属于ICP(网络内容提供商)还是ISP(网络服务提供商),该身份的确定关系到百度文库承担侵权责任的性质,即为直接侵权还是间接侵权;第二,百度文库能否通过引用“避风港”原则来免除自身责任。主要从我国“信息网络传播权条例”中有关“避风港”原则的规定出发,探讨百度究竟适用“避风港”原则还是“红旗”原则。其次,对争议焦点进行分析。先从法律对ICP(网络内容提供商)以及ISP(网络服务提供商)的规定出发,明确ICP和ISP的概念及两者侵权所应承担的法律责任,从而确定百度文库的侵权性质。再从法律对“避风港”原则的规定出发,详细阐述了“避风港”原则的适用条件,百度公司能否适用“避风港”原则免除其责任。试图通过对这些问题的阐述,明确网络服务商和权利人的相关权利与义务,以正确适用“避风港”原则,避免该原则的滥用,给今后的类似案例提供借鉴;同时,也希望能够加深社会大众对于网络著作权立法的认识,,以更好地促进网络著作权的保护和互联网的健康发展。
[Abstract]:The rapid development of the Internet has had a great impact on all aspects of social life. With the popularity of the Internet, upload, download files, pictures, software and so on become more and more easy. The network poses a severe challenge to the law of government controlling the reproduction and dissemination of information, especially the copyright law. People pay more and more attention to how the copyright law adapts to the development of the Internet. Especially in recent years, the domestic network infringement disputes emerge in endlessly, making the network copyright protection gradually become a prominent problem. Among them, the infringing case of Baidu Library once became a hot issue on the Internet, causing widespread concern both inside and outside the industry. Baidu Library and copyright owners both insisted on their own words and could not be separated from each other. How to identify and protect network intellectual property rights has once again become the focus of attention. Through the case of Han Han v. Baidu Library infringement, this paper analyzes the infringement phenomenon existing in the document sharing platform of Baidu Library, probes into the copyright infringement liability of network service provider, and probes into the systematic protection of the right of information dissemination by Chinese law. In order to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners and network service providers, promote the healthy development of the Internet in China. First, by combining the facts of the case and the court decision, two points of contention were extracted: first, the identity of Baidu Library. Whether its nature belongs to ICP (Internet content provider) or ISP (Internet Service provider), the determination of this identity is related to the nature of the liability for infringement of Baidu Library, that is, direct infringement or indirect infringement; second, Baidu library can invoke the "safe haven" principle to exempt itself from responsibility. This paper discusses whether Baidu should apply the "safe haven" principle or the "red flag" principle from the provisions of the regulations on the right of Information Network Communication in China. Secondly, the focus of the dispute is analyzed. Starting from the stipulation of ICP (Internet content provider) and ISP (Internet Service provider) in the law, the concept of ICP and ISP and the legal liability of infringement between them should be clarified, so as to determine the infringing nature of Baidu library. From the legal provisions of the "safe haven" principle, the article elaborates the applicable conditions of the "haven" principle, and whether Baidu company can apply the "haven" principle to exempt it from its responsibility. This paper attempts to clarify the relevant rights and obligations of network service providers and right holders through the elaboration of these issues, so as to correctly apply the "safe haven" principle, avoid the abuse of this principle, and provide reference for similar cases in the future. It also hopes to deepen the public's understanding of network copyright legislation so as to better promote the protection of network copyright and the healthy development of the Internet.
【学位授予单位】:湖南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 许超;;网络版权立法趋势简述[J];北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
2 田文英,孟娟;网络环境下的版权保护[J];当代法学;2000年06期
3 王迁;;网络环境中版权直接侵权的认定[J];东方法学;2009年02期
4 王迁;;论版权“间接侵权”及其规则的法定化[J];法学;2005年12期
5 胡开忠;;“避风港规则”在视频分享网站版权侵权认定中的适用[J];法学;2009年12期
6 王迁;;《信息网络传播权保护条例》中“避风港”规则的效力[J];法学;2010年06期
7 周庆安;樊哲旺;;百度案与“避风港”规则[J];法制与社会;2007年09期
8 刘晶明;;论“红旗标准”在认定“信息定位服务”提供者侵权责任中的适用范围[J];法制与社会;2009年21期
9 薛虹;实行严格责任原则——网络内容提供者的版权侵权责任[J];国际贸易;2000年01期
10 吴汉东;;论网络服务提供者的著作权侵权责任[J];中国法学;2011年02期
本文编号:1851837
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1851837.html