自媒体平台提供者信息管控的民事后果及反思

发布时间：2018-05-10 18:39

  本文选题：自媒体平台提供者 + 信息管控　； 参考：《对外经济贸易大学》2017年博士论文

【摘要】：本文主要研究的法律问题是,用户在网络平台上发布与传播的网络信息被自媒体平台服务提供者采取删除、屏蔽等措施,或者网络账号被采取暂时封禁或永久关闭技术措施的情况下,该用户可以要求自媒体平台服务提供者承担何种民事责任,侵权或是违约?本文的论述就是围绕这一主要问题层层展开:首先,本文明确了探讨这一法律问题的必要性,在用户发布或传播的信息被网络服务提供者无辜删除的情况下,人们常常潜意识的认为自己的网络言论自由受到了侵犯,因此在理论上澄清这是否对用户构成侵犯这一法律问题实属重要,因为这不仅涉及到传统的民事权利理论在网络空间中的适用,还涉及到我们对于网络自由的深刻认知。其次,基于web2.0技术模式下的网络发展现状、自媒体平台的公共性等特点,本文在第二章中系统介绍了自媒体平台服务提供者信息管控义务产生的法律基础,以及这种义务的存在可能对用户享有网络自由带来的消极影响,例如有偿删帖、错误管控、过度管控等失范现象的发生。在第三章中,本文以实践中发生的具体案例作为讨论问题的限缩线索和主线,深入分析了自媒体平台服务提供者删除用户信息是否其三种权益:是否侵犯其知识产权,具体指的是知识产权中的发表权和信息网络传播权;是否侵犯用户的消费者权益;是否侵犯用户的言论自由。其中,本文重点分析了用户信息被删除与用户言论自由基本权利受损之间的关系,并得出二者不具有等同关系的结论。在第四章中,本文主要对违约性的后果是否成立进行了讨论和分析。在司法实践中,曾有用户以其与网络服务提供者之间签订有用户服务协议为由,要求法院判令对网络服务提供者任意删帖或查封帐号的行为构成违约。基于此,本章主要对用户与自媒体平台服务提供者之间的相对性关系进行分析和考察,探究在类似案例中用户以违约责任为由提起法律之诉的合理性以及在现实情况下面临的困难,包括用户注册协议的效力,合同的无偿性是否影响违约责任的承担,合同中程序性义务的缺失等问题。在第五章中,本文在前几章论述的基础上,对于网络空间中用户对信息享有某种权利的观点进行了探讨和反思,即用户是信息的创造者,因此其对于该信息有着绝对的支配权和垄断权这种观点。此外,这种观点也将其与某一自媒体平台服务提供者之间基于用户注册协议而成立的契约无限放大至整个网络,进而得出了自媒体平台服务提供者的行为属于侵权行为。但事实上,如前文所述,当我们仔细研判种种侵犯的权利类型是否成立时,根据现有的理论体系往往无法得出恰当的结论。对此,本章所要讨论的内容就是对这一现象背后的原因进行反思和探讨,主要就两个主要问题进行讨论:第一,承载信息的网络数据只是一种载体,还是构成权利体系中的客体?第二,当自媒体平台服务提供者违规删除用户信息后,究竟是何种利益受到伤害?在第六章中,本文通过对自媒体平台提供者信息管控的民事后果进行分析和探讨之后,认为用户在网络空间中享有的是一种选择性的自由与秩序性利益,从整个人类和社会的发展角度看,这种利益仍是需要加以保护的,但上升到绝对权的保护高度是欠妥当的,因为网络信息一经产生便不具有唯一性的特性使得用户无法对其进行独占性的支配。
[Abstract]:The legal problem of this article is that the user can ask what people from the media platform service provider to publish and spread the network information on the network platform by the self media platform service provider to delete, shield and other measures, or when the network account is temporarily blocked or permanently closed. Responsibility, tort, or breach of contract? This article is discussed around this main problem: first, the civilization is sure to discuss the necessity of this legal problem, and when the information that the user releases or disseminated is deleted by the network service provider, people often subconsciously think that their freedom of speech is invaded. Therefore, it is important to clarify whether this is a legal problem for users in theory, because it not only involves the application of the traditional theory of civil rights in the cyberspace, but also involves a deep understanding of the freedom of the network. Secondly, the current status of network development based on the Web2.0 technology model, the public from the media platform. In the second chapter, this paper systematically introduces the legal basis of the information management obligation of the self media platform service provider, and the negative influence that the existence of this obligation may bring to the users' freedom of the network, such as the occurrence of the anomie phenomena such as compensated deleting, error control, and excessive management and control. In the third chapter, this paper As the clue and main line of the discussion, it analyzes the three rights and interests of the self media platform service provider to delete the user information: whether it infringes its intellectual property rights, specifically refers to the right to publish and the information network transmission in intellectual property rights, whether infringement of the user's rights and interests of consumers or not. This article focuses on the analysis of the relationship between the deletion of user information and the damage to the basic rights of the user's freedom of speech, and draws the conclusion that the two does not have the equivalent relationship. In the fourth chapter, this paper discusses and analyzes the establishment of the consequences of default. In judicial practice, there have been users in the judicial practice. On the basis of signing a user service agreement with the network service provider, it requires the court to order a breach of default. Based on this, this chapter mainly analyzes and investigates the relative relationship between the user and the service provider of the self media platform, and explores the users in similar cases. The rationality of the liability for breach of contract and the difficulties faced in the reality, including the validity of the user registration agreement, whether the compensation of the contract will affect the liability for breach of contract and the lack of procedural obligation in the contract. In the fifth chapter, on the basis of the previous chapters, this article is for the users in the cyberspace. The view that information has a certain right is discussed and reflected that the user is the creator of information, so it has the absolute dominance and monopolization of the information. In addition, this view also extends the contract to a certain self media platform service provider based on the user registration agreement. In fact, as mentioned in the previous article, when we carefully judge whether the types of infringements are set up, we can not get the proper conclusion according to the existing theoretical system. The content of this chapter is behind the phenomenon. The reasons for the reflection and discussion, mainly on the two main issues to discuss: first, the network data carrying information is only a carrier, or the object of the right system? Second, when the media platform service provider violating user information, what kind of interests are hurt? In the sixth chapter, this article through the self After the analysis and discussion of the civil consequences of the information management and control of the media platform provider, it is considered that the user enjoys a selective free and orderly interest in the cyberspace. From the perspective of the development of the whole human and the society, this interest is still needed to be protected, but it is not appropriate to rise to the protection of the absolute right. Once the network information is generated, it does not have a unique nature, which makes it impossible for users to dominate the network.

【学位授予单位】：对外经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
，

本文编号：1870421