专利默示许可的适用研究

发布时间：2018-05-13 17:05

本文选题：专利默示许可 + 权利冲突　；参考：《郑州大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：专利法是知识产权法中最复杂最专业的部分,有很多问题值得思考。从1984年出台第一部专利法到今天,我国的专利制度在理论方面和实践方面都逐渐的增强,专利案件更是向多元化和多样式的方向扩展。虽然我国专利法已经经历了几次修订,司法解释也在逐年完善,至今专利法修订意见稿还在商讨之中,但是法律本身具有滞后性、稳定性的特点,关于专利默示许可规则的相关立法空白使得在解决一部分复杂案件时现行立法也表现出无能为力。实践中专利默示许可与传统的明示许可的方式有很大的区别,适用的问题根据个例不尽相同。在诉讼过程中,默示许可作为一种侵权抗辩事由,被控侵权人对其的行使必然是在一定程度上限制了专利权人的权利,但对专利权的保护和限制相辅相成并不矛盾。不过从知识产权的宏观保护来看,无论是对专利权的保护还是限制,都是构建和完善我国知识产权保障体系的重要组成部分,明确权利义务关系和默示许可的限度,才能遏制权利滥用,维持一个良好的市场秩序,更好的保障科技进步。协调好对专利权人的保护和社会公共利益的保障之间的冲突是一个难点,对研究专利默示许可规则适用的同时也要明确这一规则的限度,否则,如果一味强调限制专利权的专利制度也必将阻碍社会的进步、经济的发展。第一章从我国立法现状开始,引入一个争议案例,介绍目前我国实践中相关问题的解决途径,并指出我国专利侵权的审判实践中现存问题是对默示许可适用范围的不确定、判定专利默示许可规则的构成要件不明确以及内容不全面。第二章分析了专利默示许可规则的价值,介绍了其基本理论,包括专利默示许可的本质、利益关系分析以及与权利用尽原则的关系。专利默示许可本质上是专利许可合同的一种。第三章对专利默示许可的适用情形做了具体的划分和归类,根据不同情形划分为四类。第四章和第五章提出专利默示许可的具体适用要件,分析了专利默示许可的具体内容,包括许可范围、许可期限、许可地域、许可费用等具体内容。结语从立法完善的角度最后总结了专利默示许可适用的可行性和必要性。
[Abstract]:Patent law is the most complex and professional part of intellectual property law. Since the first patent law was issued in 1984, the patent system of our country has been gradually strengthened in theory and practice, and patent cases have expanded to the direction of diversification and variety. Although China's patent law has undergone several revisions and judicial interpretations have been improved year by year, the revised draft of the patent law is still under discussion, but the law itself has the characteristics of lag and stability. The gaps in the legislation on patent implied licensing rules make the current legislation impotent in solving some complex cases. Patent implied license is different from traditional express license in practice. In the process of litigation, implied license is a kind of tort defense, the exercise of which is bound to limit the rights of patentee to some extent, but the protection and limitation of patent right is not contradictory. However, from the perspective of the macro protection of intellectual property, whether it is the protection of patent rights or the restriction, it is an important part of building and perfecting the intellectual property protection system of our country, and clearly defines the relationship between rights and obligations and the limits of implied licensing. Ability to curb abuse of power, maintain a good market order, better protection of scientific and technological progress. It is a difficult point to coordinate the conflict between the protection of patentee and the protection of social public interest. When studying the application of patent implied license rules, we should also make clear the limits of this rule, otherwise, If the patent system of restricting patent rights is emphasized blindly, it will hinder the progress of society and the development of economy. The first chapter begins with the current situation of our country's legislation, introduces a controversial case, introduces the ways to solve the related problems in our country's practice, and points out that the existing problems in the trial practice of patent infringement in our country are the uncertainty of the scope of application of implied license. The constitution of patent implied license rules is not clear and the content is not comprehensive. The second chapter analyzes the value of patent implied licensing rules, and introduces its basic theory, including the nature of patent implied licensing, the analysis of interest relationship and the relationship with the principle of exhaustion of rights. Patent implied license is essentially a kind of patent license contract. The third chapter classifies and classifies the patent implied license into four categories according to different situations. The fourth and fifth chapters put forward the specific application elements of patent implied license, and analyzed the specific content of patent implied license, including the scope of the license, the duration of the license, the region of the license, the licensing fee and so on. The conclusion summarizes the feasibility and necessity of patent implied license application from the angle of legislative perfection.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.42

【相似文献】