反假冒贸易协议下电子商务平台的法律责任研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 19:52

本文选题：ACTA + 电子商务平台　；参考：《华南理工大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前，以美国为首的发达国家正在全球范围鼓动强化知识产权保护运用，敦促其他国家签署《反假冒贸易协议》（Anti-Counterfeiting TradeAgreement，简称ACTA）。ACTA的重要内容之一在于强化包括电子商务平台在内的网络服务提供商的法律责任。尽管我国没有加入ACTA，但是科技经济全球化的趋势以及欧美国家对我国施加的知识产权保护压力，使得我们不可忽视ACTA可能给我电子商务产业发展带来的影响。本文通过对比ACTA与TRIPS协议中有关第三方责任的相关规定，结合我国目前有关网络服务提供商对于他人利用其平台所进行的侵权活动的相关规定，分析在新的知识产权国际保护环境下，在未来的司法实践中，电子商务平台对此类侵权行为应如何采取应对措施，达到既鼓励互联网贸易的发展又能有效遏制在线交易中的制假贩假行为。本文第一章介绍ACTA的缔结背景及起草过程中网络服务提供商的法律责任的沿革，，并与TRIPS协议中第三方法律责任相关条款的比较分析；第二章介绍国内外电子商务平台的司法实践中出现的有关争议，并将有关的判决标准与ACTA中的相关规定比较；第三章简要分析在ACTA视野下电子商务平台的法律责任，包括电子商务平台的法律地位，以及帮助侵权责任和替代侵权责任对电子商务平台的适用；最后从ACTA以及行业发展的角度出发，为我国的电子商务贸易构建良好的法律环境提出相关的法律建议，包括事前审查和合理注意义务、主观过错认定、合作与责任豁免、禁令和临时措施四个方面。
[Abstract]:At present, the developed countries, led by the United States, are aggrandizement of the application of intellectual property protection on a global scale. One of the important contents of the Anti-Counterfeiting TradeAgreement (ACTA).ACTA is to strengthen the legal responsibility of network service providers, including the flat platform of electronic commerce. China does not join the ACTA, but the trend of the globalization of science and technology and the pressure on the protection of intellectual property rights imposed by the European and American countries have made it impossible for us to ignore the impact that ACTA may bring to the development of the e-commerce industry.
By comparing the relevant provisions of the third party liability in the ACTA and the TRIPS agreement and the relevant provisions of the current relevant regulations of the network service providers on the infringement of their platform by the Internet service providers, this paper analyzes the infringement of the electronic commerce platform in the future judicial practice under the new international protection environment of intellectual property rights. The first chapter introduces the background of the conclusion of ACTA and the evolution of the legal responsibility of the network service provider in the process of drafting, and the comparison of the relevant provisions of the third party's legal responsibility in the TRIPS agreement. The second chapter introduces the relevant disputes in the judicial practice of the e-commerce platform at home and abroad, and compares the relevant judgment standards with the relevant provisions in the ACTA; the third chapter briefly analyzes the legal responsibility of the e-commerce platform under the view of ACTA, including the legal status of the e-commerce platform, and the help of the tort liability and the alternative torts. In the end, from the perspective of ACTA and the development of the industry, we put forward relevant legal proposals for the construction of a good legal environment for China's e-commerce trade, including four aspects: pre review and reasonable duty of care, subjective fault identification, cooperation and liability exemption, prohibition and temporary measures.

【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.4;D922.29

【参考文献】