论著作权权利冲突之化解机制
发布时间:2018-05-15 22:16
本文选题:著作权 + 权利冲突 ; 参考:《宁波大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着科技的进步和经济的发展,受法律保护的知识产品日益增多,知识产权的保护范围日益扩大,也由于人们对知识产品的占有不像对有形物质产品那样实在而具体,而是表现为认识和利用,所以知识产权领域容易产生权利间的冲突。本文从有瑕疵的著作权权利冲突的角度进行分析,试图提出能够完善我国著作权权利冲突的化解机制。 本文的第一部分主要概括著作权权利冲突的情形、原因及影响。其中,著作权权利冲突的情形主要有三种:著作权与其他著作权的冲突,著作权与商标权的冲突、著作权与外观设计专利权的冲突。这些冲突产生的原因有三个:内在原因、外部原因及制度原因。这些冲突的产生对法律,对市场秩序及对当事人都有消极的影响。本文以此作为全文研究的背景和基础资料,对著作权权利权冲突的化解机制进行探讨。 本文的第二部分阐述了我国现行法律对著作权权利冲突的化解机制及其存在的问题。虽然关于著作权权利冲突的化解机制被分散在各部知识产权法中,并且都以不同的处理方法去化解,但是殊途同归,我国法律为了鼓励首创,减少冲突,将法律的天平倾向了在先著作权一方。我国法律对化解著作权权利冲突的规定虽然已经很详尽,但是仍然存在实体和程序上的各种问题。 本文的第三部分是对其他相关国家关于化解著作权权利冲突化解机制的考察。“相对保护在先权利原则”、“经济价值分析原则”以及“利益平衡原则”是国际上化解知识产权权利冲突的基本原则,各国在贯彻这些原则的做法上都体现了自己的特色,,他山之玉可以攻石,笔者希望在前人的基础上尽可能地考察更多的国外立法,试图找到能够完善我国化解著作权权利冲突的可借鉴的经验。 本文的第四部分以前三部分为基础,就如何完善我国化解著作权权利冲突的机制提出了笔者的建议。笔者认为应当以坚持衡平理念下的保护在先权利为原则;以完善相关法律制度为手段;以完善救济制度为保障,三管齐下,化解著作权权利冲突。
[Abstract]:With the progress of science and technology and the development of economy, the number of knowledge products protected by law is increasing day by day, and the scope of intellectual property protection is expanding day by day. Instead, it is manifested in recognition and utilization, so intellectual property rights field is prone to conflict between rights. Based on the analysis of the defective conflict of copyright rights, this paper tries to put forward a mechanism to resolve the conflict of copyright rights in China. The first part of this paper summarizes the conflict of copyright rights, reasons and effects. Among them, there are three kinds of conflict of copyright right: the conflict between copyright and other copyright, the conflict between copyright and trademark right, and the conflict between copyright and design patent right. There are three reasons for these conflicts: internal reasons, external causes and institutional reasons. These conflicts have negative effects on the law, market order and the parties concerned. This paper takes this as the background and basic material of the full text research, and probes into the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights and rights. The second part of this paper expounds the mechanism and existing problems of the conflict of copyright rights under the current law of our country. Although the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights has been scattered in the intellectual property laws of various departments and is resolved in different ways, the same way is achieved. In order to encourage the initiative, the laws of our country reduce the conflict. Tilt the balance of the law to the prior copyright party. Although the provisions of Chinese law to resolve the conflict of copyright rights are very detailed, there are still various substantive and procedural problems. The third part is about the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights in other countries. The principle of relative protection of prior rights, the principle of economic value analysis and the principle of balance of interests are the basic principles for resolving the conflict of intellectual property rights in the world. The author hopes to investigate more foreign legislation on the basis of predecessors, and try to find out the experience that can be used for reference to solve the conflict of copyright rights in our country. On the basis of the first three parts of this paper, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the mechanism of resolving the conflict of copyright rights in our country. The author believes that the principle of upholding the principle of equalizing the protection of prior rights; the improvement of the relevant legal system as a means; to improve the relief system as the protection, three-pronged approach to resolve the conflict of copyright rights.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高荣林;;向前看:解决商标权与著作权冲突的另一种思路[J];中华商标;2010年11期
2 周详;知识产权权利冲突若干问题研究[J];电子知识产权;2004年07期
3 杨才然;;与知识产权有关的权利冲突协调原则之理论基础[J];电子知识产权;2005年11期
4 陈丽娟,郑光辉;商标合理使用制度及其立法完善[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2005年01期
5 王蓉;从杨某噪声案看权利冲突的衡平和通约[J];法学杂志;2002年02期
6 李阁霞;;知识产权权利冲突探析[J];法学杂志;2008年01期
7 谢晓尧;论识别性标示的竞争法保护[J];法学评论;2000年03期
8 吴汉东;关于知识产权本体、主体与客体的重新认识——以财产所有权为比较研究对象[J];法学评论;2000年05期
9 张振杰;;对著作权领域权利冲突问题的法律分析[J];法制与经济(下半月);2007年06期
10 苏敏;;外观设计专利权与著作权冲突原因浅析[J];法制与社会;2007年10期
本文编号:1894175
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1894175.html