论商标法中的惩罚性赔偿

发布时间：2018-05-19 20:19

本文选题：商标侵权 + 侵权损害赔偿　；参考：《华东政法大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着经济的飞速发展，商标侵权现象越来越普遍，这已经不仅是对商标权人利益的损害，同时也是对社会公共利益的损害。而且由于侵权成本低，反复侵权的现象也不少。如何强化对商标权的保护，是亟待解决的问题。为了弥补对商标权人的补偿不足，我国《商标法》在2013年修改时，正式引入了惩罚性赔偿制度。惩罚性赔偿不仅可以弥补传统补偿性赔偿救济的不足，同时还可以将商标刑事保护和民事保护衔接起来，从而完善商标侵权责任体系。但惩罚性赔偿也存在许多的争议，，特别是在惩罚性赔偿的适用条件及其数额的确定方面。而对于如何适用惩罚性赔偿制度以及相关的立法完善，毋庸讳言，当前我国理论界和实务界的研究还不能完全适应立法和司法实践的需要。作为惩罚性赔偿的起源地，英国和美国在将惩罚性赔偿运用到商标权领域方面的立法与司法实践经验十分丰富，已经建立了相对较为完整的体系。同时，我国在《消费者权益保护法》等法律中也有惩罚性赔偿的尝试。这些中外经验，都为我国商标法中的惩罚性赔偿制度的完善提供了有效的借鉴。本文第一章“商标法中惩罚性赔偿制度理论探析及司法适用困惑”，主要概述了惩罚性赔偿制度的基本理论方面存在的争议以及惩罚性赔偿制度在我国商标法中的适用可能出现的一些困惑。本章主要论述了以下问题：惩罚性赔偿的性质与功能方面的争议；惩罚性赔偿在我国其他法律中适用出现的问题；商标法中惩罚性赔偿立法本身存在的不足。第二章“商标法惩罚性赔偿制度的比较研究”，主要是对惩罚性赔偿在不同国家的立法及其适用进行了一个比较法研究。首先阐述了大陆法系国家在知识产权领域对惩罚性赔偿制度的一个态度转变，这也为我国将惩罚性赔偿制度引入商标法奠定了一些基础。然后重点突出了英国、美国等英美法系在惩罚性赔偿制度适用中采取的一些做法，并总结出共同点，为我国商标法中惩罚性赔偿制度的设计提供借鉴。第三章“我国商标法中惩罚性赔偿制度的适用及完善”，是对我国商标法中惩罚性赔偿制度的完善及今后的具体适用提出一些建议。本章主要论述了以下内容：惩罚性赔偿责任的适用条件，包括恶意的认定，情节严重的考量因素，以及被侵权人的请求；我国商标法中惩罚性赔偿金的计算模式，我国商标法中惩罚性赔偿金应当是以补偿性赔偿金为基础的，按照一定倍数进行计算；惩罚性赔偿责任与其他侵权责任的关系，惩罚性赔偿不得与法定赔偿金、罚款同时适用，同时可以在一定程度上代替罚金。结束语部分对本文的主要内容和基本观点进行了归纳、总结，并对本课题的后续研究提出了建议。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of economy, trademark infringement is becoming more and more common, which is not only the damage to the interests of trademark owners, but also to the public interests. And because tort cost is low, the phenomenon of repeated tort is also many. How to strengthen the protection of trademark rights is an urgent problem to be solved. In order to make up for the deficiency of compensation to the trademark owner, the punitive damages system was formally introduced when the Trademark Law was amended in 2013. Punitive damages can not only remedy the shortcomings of traditional compensatory remedies, but also link the criminal protection of trademarks with civil protection, thus perfecting the trademark tort liability system. However, there are many disputes in punitive damages, especially in the application conditions of punitive damages and the determination of the amount of punitive damages. As to how to apply the punitive damages system and how to perfect the relevant legislation, there is no denying that the current theoretical and practical research in our country can not fully meet the needs of legislation and judicial practice. As the origin of punitive damages, the United Kingdom and the United States in the application of punitive damages to the field of trademark law and judicial practice experience is very rich, has established a relatively complete system. At the same time, there are some attempts of punitive damages in the Law of Protection of Consumer Rights and interests in our country. These Chinese and foreign experiences have provided effective reference for the perfection of punitive damages system in trademark law of our country. In the first chapter, "the theoretical analysis of punitive damages in trademark law and the confusion of judicial application", This paper mainly summarizes the disputes existing in the basic theory of punitive damages system and some puzzles about the application of punitive damages system in trademark law of our country. This chapter mainly discusses the following issues: the nature and function of punitive damages disputes; punitive damages in other laws of our country in the application of problems; trademark law of punitive damages legislation itself shortcomings. The second chapter is the comparative study of the punitive damages system of trademark law, mainly a comparative study on the legislation and application of punitive damages in different countries. Firstly, this paper expounds a change of attitude towards punitive damages system in the field of intellectual property rights in civil law countries, which also lays a foundation for the introduction of punitive damages system into trademark law in our country. Then focus on the United Kingdom, the United States and other Anglo-American legal systems in the application of punitive damages system adopted some practices, and summed up the common ground, for our trademark law in the design of punitive damages system for reference. Chapter three, "Application and perfection of punitive damages system in Trademark Law of our country", is to put forward some suggestions on the perfection of punitive damages system in Trademark Law of our country and the concrete application in the future. This chapter mainly discusses the following contents: the applicable conditions of punitive damages liability, including malicious determination, serious consideration factors, as well as the request of the infringed party, the calculation mode of punitive damages in trademark law of our country. In our trademark law, punitive damages should be based on compensatory damages and be calculated in accordance with certain multiples. At the same time, it can replace the fine to some extent. The conclusion part summarizes the main contents and basic viewpoints of this paper, and puts forward some suggestions for the follow-up study of this subject.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.43

【参考文献】