论我国专利侵权中诉前禁令措施
发布时间:2018-05-19 21:40
本文选题:专利法 + 专利侵权 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2013年硕士论文
【摘要】:诉前禁令措施的建立是以我国加入世界贸易组织,满足《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》的要求为时代背景的,为履行成员国应尽的条约义务,我国修改了知识产权相关法律,设立了诉前禁令措施。这一制度的设立、实施是我国知识产权保护制度史上的一个重要里程碑。由于该措施在我国处于起步阶段,在司法实践中存在不足,,这需要我们不断地学习和借鉴国外先进的法律理念和优秀的立法经验,来完善我国的现有立法,使我国的法律制度能够更好的与世界接轨。 本文研究的目是深入分析我国专利侵权诉讼中的诉前禁令措施存在的问题,提出一些建议,以便在司法实践中正确运用诉前禁令,鼓励发明创造,保护和促进我国的知识产权的发展。文章首先从诉前禁令的基本内容入手,阐述了诉前禁令的涵义、起源、分类、特点及在我国的产生,为之后的论述铺垫了必要的理论基础。然后分析了两大法系国家的诉前禁令措施,以便我国司法机关充分借鉴国外成功的立法和实践经验。并找出我国诉前禁令措施存在的问题,再比照诉前禁令措施比较完善的美国,结合国内的实践,从立法理论、实践来角度,提出自己的建议。
[Abstract]:The establishment of pre-lawsuit prohibition measures is based on China's accession to the World Trade Organization and meeting the requirements of the Agreement on Trade-Related aspects of intellectual property Rights (trips Agreement). In order to fulfill the treaty obligations due to member States, China has amended the relevant laws on intellectual property rights. Pre-suit injunctions have been established. The establishment of this system is an important milestone in the history of intellectual property protection system in China. Because this measure is in its infancy in our country, it is necessary for us to learn and learn from foreign advanced legal concepts and excellent legislative experience to perfect the existing legislation in our country. So that our legal system can better with the world. The purpose of this paper is to deeply analyze the problems existing in the measures of pre-suit injunction in patent infringement litigation in China, and put forward some suggestions in order to use the injunction correctly in judicial practice and encourage invention and creation. To protect and promote the development of intellectual property rights in China. The article begins with the basic content of the injunction before lawsuit, and expounds the meaning, origin, classification, characteristics and emergence of the injunction in China, which lays the necessary theoretical foundation for the later discussion. Then it analyzes the pre-lawsuit injunctions in the countries of two legal systems, so that the judicial organs of our country can draw lessons from the successful legislation and practice experience of foreign countries. And find out the existing problems of the pre-lawsuit injunction measures in our country, and then compare the pre-lawsuit injunction measures more perfect in the United States, combined with the domestic practice, from the legislative theory, practical point of view, put forward their own suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩天岚;知识产权诉讼中诉前禁令的适用[J];电子知识产权;2004年04期
2 和育东;;试析专利侵权诉前禁令制度存在的问题[J];法学杂志;2009年03期
3 冯洁涵;全球公共健康危机、知识产权国际保护与WTO多哈宣言[J];法学评论;2003年02期
4 马瑞春;;论完善我国知识产权禁令制度[J];法制与社会;2008年15期
5 须建楚;知识产权审判中禁令的适用[J];科技与法律;2003年04期
6 段立红;诉前临时措施的审查标准──中外专利侵权诉讼临时措施制度比较[J];人民司法;2001年09期
7 陈家宏,李永泉;禁止令制度初探[J];西南交通大学学报(社会科学版);2004年02期
8 谢晓玲;;法院审理专利侵权诉前禁令案件问题探析[J];山东理工大学学报(社会科学版);2011年03期
9 冯晓青;;知识产权法的价值构造:知识产权法利益平衡机制研究[J];中国法学;2007年01期
10 李德山;临时禁令在美国专利侵权诉讼中的适用[J];知识产权;1999年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 蒋志培;[N];人民法院报;2001年
本文编号:1911819
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/1911819.html