论网络知识产权侵权纠纷中的保全证据公证

发布时间：2018-05-31 06:07

本文选题：网络知识产权 + 侵权纠纷　；参考：《华东政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：进入网络时代后，随着各种新兴网络数字技术的发展，网络给人类社会带来了巨大的收益，它不仅丰富了人们的精神文化生活，而且还给全球经济发展带来了革命性的驱动力。而与此同时，在日新月异的网络环境下，知识产权保护却受到了前所未有的冲击。针对网络环境带来的各种新问题和新挑战，从国际组织到各主权国家，都在积极地完善知识产权立法、制定应对机制，以适应这个时代的要求。在这个过程中，网络知识产权这一新兴事物逐渐从传统知识产权中衍生而出成为了近些年来知识产权领域关注和研究的焦点。现实中一个标志现象就是，在司法实践中，法院受理的涉及网络知识产权的侵权纠纷数量逐年递增，已经占据了知识产权案件的半壁江山。由于网络所具有的即时性、虚拟性、变动性等特征，使得网络知识产权侵权纠纷的争议焦点与传统知识产权案件有所不同，而且也造成了诉讼当事人对其主张的事实难以举证的问题。而保全证据公证则是解决这一问题的一个有效途径。我国公证制度虽然起步较晚，但在《民事诉讼法》及《公证法》的制度支撑下，已经建立起了具有公信力的证明体系，公证证据的证明效力也在理论和实践中得到了验证。保全证据公证更是以其丰富的应用方法，严谨的证明形式成为了网络知识产权侵权纠纷中最为主要的取证方式。本文旨在通过对网络知识产权及其侵权纠纷以及保全证据公证制度的研究分析，归纳总结出保全证据公证在网络知识产权侵权纠纷中的具体应用方式。在此基础上，，再对网络知识产权环境下公证保护的创新与完善提出建议。本文共分四个部分：第一章先是阐释网络知识产权的概念和特征，并分节介绍网络知识产权的具体内容和立法现状。而后对公证在网络知识产权环境下的保护现状和存在的问题进行探讨；第二章是在第一章的基础之上先对现实司法实践中网络知识产权侵权纠纷所涉及的侵权行为主体、侵权方法及诉讼中的争议焦点进行阐述分析。而后再对公证制度及保全证据公证的概念、特征及类型进行介绍；第三章以网络知识产权侵权纠纷的举证要点入手，从证明网络知识产权权属、证明侵权行为事实以及侵权损害赔偿数额三个方面具体阐释保全证据公证的具体应用方法；第四章从网络知识产权公证保护完善的具体落实和对实务的建议两个部分进行具体阐述。
[Abstract]:After entering the network age, with the development of various new network digital technologies, the network has brought enormous benefits to the human society. It not only enriches people's spiritual and cultural life, but also brings revolutionary driving force to the development of global economy. At the same time, in the rapidly changing network environment, intellectual property protection has been unprecedented impact. In view of the new problems and challenges brought about by the network environment, from international organizations to sovereign countries, they are actively perfecting the legislation of intellectual property rights and formulating corresponding mechanisms to meet the requirements of the times. In this process, network intellectual property, as a new thing, has gradually become the focus of attention and research in the field of intellectual property in recent years. A sign phenomenon in reality is that in judicial practice, the number of infringement disputes involving network intellectual property rights accepted by the court is increasing year by year, which has already occupied half of the intellectual property rights cases. Because of the real-time, fictitious and changeable characteristics of the network, the dispute focus of the network intellectual property infringement is different from the traditional intellectual property rights case. And also caused the litigant to its claim of the facts difficult to prove the problem. The notarization of preservation evidence is an effective way to solve this problem. Although the notarization system of our country started relatively late, under the support of "Civil procedure Law" and "notarization Law", a credible proof system has been established, and the validity of notarization evidence has also been verified in theory and practice. Preservation of evidence notarization with its rich application, rigorous form of proof has become the network intellectual property rights infringement dispute the most important way to obtain evidence. The purpose of this paper is to sum up the concrete application of preservation evidence notarization in network intellectual property infringement disputes through the research and analysis of network intellectual property rights and the notarization system of preservation evidence. On this basis, the innovation and improvement of notarization protection under the environment of network intellectual property rights are put forward. This paper is divided into four parts: The first chapter first explains the concept and characteristics of network intellectual property, and introduces the specific content and legislative status of network intellectual property. Then it discusses the current situation and existing problems of notarization protection under the environment of network intellectual property rights. The second chapter is based on the first chapter of the real judicial practice of network intellectual property rights infringement disputes involved in the infringement of the main body, tort methods and the focus of disputes in litigation are analyzed. Then it introduces the concept, characteristics and types of notarization system and preservation evidence notarization. The third chapter starts with the main points of proof of network intellectual property infringement dispute, and explains the concrete application methods of preserving evidence notarization from three aspects: proving the ownership of network intellectual property right, proving the fact of infringement and the amount of compensation for tort damage. The fourth chapter elaborates the concrete implementation of network intellectual property notarization protection and the practical suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.4;D925.1

【参考文献】