论网络知识产权犯罪的刑事立法完善

发布时间：2018-05-31 04:45

本文选题：网络知识产权犯罪 + 刑事立法　；参考：《安徽财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国已经成为知识产权发展最快的国家,相信不久我国将迎来知识产权时代。而网络知识产权则是即将到来的知识产权时代里最重要的组成部分。网络数据信息的爆炸式增长,为创新提供了素材,同时网络本身也为创造提供了技术支持。但随之而来的是网络大量侵权行为的存在和相应法律法规的模糊规定。现行的知识产权制度中关于知识产权犯罪客观方面的规定已经有很多不适用于网络的情况。网络知识产权犯罪是一种依靠网络技术进行的犯罪,而且犯罪对象也存在于网络里,因此它与传统的知识产权犯罪有很多不同。这就会使现行的知识产权刑事法律规范在打击网络知识产权犯罪时有诸多不适宜的地方,不利于网络知识产权的良好发展。而且随着网络知识产权和网络知识产权犯罪的发展,现行的知识产权犯罪刑事立法规范也会越来越不足,这就需要不断进行理论和实践的研究,找出弥补这些不足之处的方式。本文先引入网络知识产权犯罪的含义,结合着它与传统知识产权犯罪的不同,重点分析网络知识产权犯罪对现行刑事立法提出的新的要求。最后提出完善的对策。网络知识产权犯罪对现行刑事法律总体最大的挑战主要集中在刑事实体法的犯罪构成规定上,刑事程序法中关于起诉主体的安排、法院关于网路知识产权犯罪管辖权的协调、对证据的要求更高以及法院审判职能的专业化上。因此本文的主体内容主要就是围绕这些问题展开论述的。在行文结构上,按照上述思路的安排,本文的内容分为四个部分。第一部分主要阐述网络知识产权犯罪的概念及其表现形式,以用来明确界定什么是网络知识产权犯罪,它与普通知识产权犯罪的主要区别;第二部分分别从网络知识产权犯罪对传统知识产权犯罪的实体法和程序法两个方面的挑战,为后续立法建议找到突破口;第三部分分析我国知识产权犯罪立法现状,找出我国网络知识产权犯罪刑事立法存在的不足,从而为提出具体的建议找到立足点;第四部分主要结合以上三个部分的内容就完善网络知识产权犯罪的立法提出具体的建议。
[Abstract]:China has become the country with the fastest development of intellectual property, I believe that our country will usher in the era of intellectual property soon. Network intellectual property is the most important part of the coming intellectual property era. The explosive growth of network data provides material for innovation, and the network itself provides technical support for creation. However, the following is the existence of a large number of network torts and the fuzzy provisions of the corresponding laws and regulations. In the current intellectual property system, there are many provisions on the objective aspects of intellectual property crimes that are not applicable to the network. Network intellectual property crime is a crime that depends on the network technology, and the object of crime also exists in the network, so it is different from the traditional intellectual property crime. This will make the current intellectual property criminal law norms in the fight against network intellectual property crimes there are a lot of inappropriate places, is not conducive to the good development of network intellectual property rights. And with the development of network intellectual property and network intellectual property crime, the current criminal legislation of intellectual property crime will be more and more inadequate, which requires continuous theoretical and practical research to find out the ways to remedy these deficiencies. This paper first introduces the meaning of network intellectual property crime, combined with the difference between it and traditional intellectual property crime, and analyzes the new requirements of network intellectual property crime on the current criminal legislation. Finally, put forward the perfect countermeasure. The greatest challenge to the current criminal law is mainly focused on the criminal constitution of the criminal substantive law, the arrangement of the prosecution subject in the criminal procedure law and the coordination of the jurisdiction of the court on the crime of network intellectual property. The higher demand for evidence and the professionalization of the court's judicial function. Therefore, the main content of this paper is mainly around these issues. In the structure of the text, according to the above thinking arrangement, the content of this paper is divided into four parts. The first part mainly expounds the concept of network intellectual property crime and its manifestation, in order to clearly define what network intellectual property crime is, and the main difference between network intellectual property crime and ordinary intellectual property crime. The second part from the network intellectual property rights crime to the traditional intellectual property rights crime substantive law and the procedure law two aspects challenge, for the follow-up legislation suggestion to find the breakthrough; the third part analysis our country intellectual property right crime legislation present situation, To find out the shortcomings of criminal legislation of network intellectual property crime in our country, so as to find a foothold for putting forward concrete suggestions; the fourth part mainly combines the contents of the above three parts to put forward specific suggestions to improve the legislation of network intellectual property crime.
【学位授予单位】：安徽财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D924.33

【参考文献】