滥用知识产权的反垄断法律规制研究

发布时间：2018-06-24 08:27

本文选题：知识产权 + 滥用知识产权　；参考：《西南政法大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：当今社会是一个知识经济社会，在纷繁复杂的经济竞争中，知识产权的地位显得尤为重要，由知识产权滥用而引发的垄断行为也越来越凸显。在我国，随着《反垄断法》的颁布，从对知识产权法与反垄断法之间复杂关系的理解，到反垄断法对滥用知识产权行为的规制，不仅受到知识产权法学界的关注，更是成为反垄断法学界研究的重要课题。尤其是近年来随着我国加入WTO，跨国公司纷纷进入我国，在我国利用知识产权进行垄断的行为愈演愈烈。但遗憾的是，我国相关领域的立法过于原则、模糊，反垄断执法效率低下，司法实践经验不足等原因导致我国从企业到消费者都面临着极为不利的局面。因此，加强对滥用知识产权的反垄断法律规制问题的研究是一个具有重要意义的研究课题。本文除引言外，共分为五部分：引言以360诉QQ案和苹果公司诉三星公司案引出，提出案情反映的议题即本文研究的问题，概述了学术界对滥用知识产权反垄断法律规制的研究现状，提出本文的研究内容、研究方法及创新之处。第一部分，研究知识产权的保护与滥用的相关问题。从界定知识产权的概念和性质引出滥用知识产权的概念及现有法律、法规对滥用知识产权行为的规制，同时提出知识产权的滥用行为主要涉及专利权滥用的观点。第二部分，研究知识产权与反垄断的相关关系。从知识产权法与反垄断法的关系，滥用知识产权与排除、限制竞争之间的关系，知识产权与市场支配地位之间的关系这三组关系来分析。第三部分，研究我国反垄断法律体系在知识产权领域的实施现状。第一，根据《反垄断法》基本分析框架，受我国《反垄断法》规制的滥用知识产权的典型行为可分为滥用市场支配地位的行为、限制竞争协议的行为和企业合并的行为。其中典型的滥用市场支配地位的行为有拒绝许可、搭售、价格歧视行为，典型的限制竞争协议的行为有交叉许可和联营协议、价格限制的行为。除此之外，还有与技术标准相关的知识产权行为是近几年来受到理论与实务界普遍关注的行为之一。其次，从立法、执法、司法三个方面阐述我国知识产权领域的反垄断法律规制现状及存在的问题。第四部分，研究学习、借鉴国外有关知识产权滥用的反垄断法律规制的理论与实践经验，以及我国可以从中受到的若干启示。这里主要是借鉴美国、欧盟和日本的经验。第五部分，在借鉴美国、欧盟、日本的相关经验的同时，结合我国现阶段特有的经济形势、社会情况，从四个方面来提出关于如何完善我国反垄断法律体系对滥用知识产权行为进行规制的建议。该部分由四个小部分组成：第一，制定知识产权领域的反垄断执法指南；第二，，对法律责任进行细化、优化规定；第三，设立专门的具有独立性的反垄断执法机构；第四，设立专门的反垄断法庭。结语部分对我国现阶段滥用知识产权的反垄断规制进行概括总结，对以后采用多学科、多方法进行更加全面的研究提出设想。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the society is a knowledge-based economy society. In the complicated and complicated economic competition, the status of intellectual property is particularly important. The monopolistic behavior caused by the abuse of intellectual property is becoming more and more prominent. In China, with the promulgation of the antitrust law, the understanding of the complex relationship between the intellectual property law and the antitrust law, to the antitrust law. The regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights is not only paid attention to by the intellectual property law circle, but also an important subject in the field of antitrust law. Especially in recent years, with China's entry into WTO, transnational corporations have entered China in succession, and the behavior of using intellectual property to monopolize in our country is becoming more and more intense. The legislation is too principled, fuzzy, the efficiency of the anti-monopoly law enforcement is low, the judicial practice is insufficient, and so on, which leads to the extremely unfavorable situation in our country from the enterprise to the consumer. Therefore, it is an important research topic to strengthen the research on the legal regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights.
In addition to the introduction, this article is divided into five parts.
The introduction, led by 360 cases of QQ and the case of Apple Corp and Samsung Corp, puts forward the issues reflected in the case, that is, the study of this article, and summarizes the research status of the academic circles on the abuse of intellectual property rights antitrust laws and regulations, and puts forward the research contents, research methods and innovations of this paper.
In the first part, the problems related to the protection and abuse of intellectual property rights are studied. From the definition and nature of intellectual property rights, the concept of abusing intellectual property and the existing laws and regulations on the abuse of intellectual property rights are introduced. At the same time, the abuse of intellectual property is mainly concerned with the view that the abuse of patent rights is mainly involved.
The second part studies the relationship between intellectual property rights and antitrust. From the relationship between intellectual property law and antitrust law, the relationship between intellectual property rights and exclusion, restriction of competition, and the relationship between intellectual property rights and market dominance, the relationship between intellectual property rights and market dominance is analyzed.
The third part is to study the present situation of the implementation of China's antitrust legal system in the field of intellectual property rights. Firstly, according to the basic analytical framework of the antitrust law, the typical behavior of abusing intellectual property rights regulated by China's antitrust law can be divided into behavior of abusing the dominant position of the market, limiting the behavior of the competition agreement and the behavior of the merger of enterprises. The behavior of abusing market dominance is denial of license, tying, price discrimination, and typical behavior restricting competition agreements with cross licensing and joint agreement and price restriction. In addition, intellectual property behavior related to technical standards is one of the common concerns of theoretical and practical circles in recent years. Secondly, from the three aspects of legislation, law enforcement and judicature, this paper expounds the current situation and existing problems of the legal regulation of anti monopoly in the field of intellectual property in China.
The fourth part, study and study, draw lessons from the theoretical and practical experiences of foreign antitrust legal regulations on the abuse of intellectual property rights, as well as some inspirations in China. This is mainly the experience of the United States, the European Union and Japan.
The fifth part, in reference to the relevant experience of the United States, the European Union and Japan, combined with the specific economic situation and social situation in our country at the present stage, from four aspects, it puts forward some suggestions on how to improve the regulation of the abuse of intellectual property rights by our antitrust legal system. This part is composed of four small parts: first, to formulate knowledge production. The anti monopoly law enforcement guide in the right field; second, to refine the legal responsibility and optimize the regulations; third, set up a special anti monopoly law enforcement agency with independence; and fourth, set up a special antitrust tribunal.
The concluding part summarizes the antitrust regulation of the abuse of intellectual property right in our country at the present stage, and puts forward a tentative plan for a more comprehensive study of multidisciplinary and multi methods in the future.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.294;D923.4

【参考文献】