《反假冒贸易协定》下我国知识产权刑事保护研究

发布时间：2018-07-10 00:58

本文选题：反假冒贸易协定 + 知识产权　；参考：《湘潭大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：由于发达国家并不满足于《与贸易有关的知识产权协议》（下文简称Trips协议）侧重于实体权利上的保护，他们意欲追求更高的知识产权执法标准，故渐渐将重心放在知识产权执法之上。加之近年来随着知识产权对贸易的影响力越来越大，假冒和盗版这类犯罪行为越来越猖獗，此时旨在强有力打击假冒和盗版的反假冒贸易协定（下文简称“ACTA”)就应运而生了，，ACTA的最大特点是在执法上加大力度，欲通过加强其缔约国的知识产权执法力度来辐射非缔约国，当然也包括中国。ACTA在民事措施、边境措施、刑事措施、数字环境下的专门执法措施等方面都超过了Trips标准的执法规则。与之相比较，我国知识产权的刑事保护还存在一些不足，立法方面主要表现为立法指导思想存在偏差、法律术语模糊不清和立法不能与时俱进，刑事司法方面主要表现为起诉方式存在欠缺、刑事附带民事诉讼有待加强等。为此应切实更新知识产权刑事保护的立法理念，转变立法模式，完善刑事法规体系，确保有效保障被害人利益的同时也要注重保护作为侵权者的被告人的基本诉讼权利。ACTA虽然反映的是发达国家的利益诉求，发展中国家从一开始就被排斥在这个协议的谈判过程之外，但作为贸易大国的中国不可能置这一围绕贸易而展开的旨在加强知识产权执法的协定于不顾，必须未雨绸缪，密切关注研究此协议。而本文将落脚点放在了探究在ACTA背景下我国该如何应对以及我国的知识产权刑事保护该何去何从。
[Abstract]:Since developed countries are not satisfied with the trips Agreement (hereinafter referred to as trips Agreement), which focuses on the protection of substantive rights, they want to pursue higher standards of intellectual property enforcement, Therefore, gradually focus on intellectual property law enforcement. In addition, with the increasing influence of intellectual property rights on trade in recent years, crimes such as counterfeiting and piracy have become increasingly rampant. At this time, the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement ("ACTA"), which is aimed at effectively combating counterfeiting and piracy (hereinafter referred to as "ACTA"), has emerged as the greatest feature of ACTA, which is characterized by greater efforts in law enforcement. To radiate non-parties by strengthening the intellectual property law enforcement of their States parties, including, of course, China's .ACTA civil, border, and criminal measures, The special enforcement measures in digital environment exceed the rules of trips standard. By comparison, there are still some shortcomings in criminal protection of intellectual property in our country. The legislative aspect mainly shows that there are deviations in guiding ideology of legislation, ambiguity of legal terms and failure of legislation to keep pace with the times. In criminal justice, there are some shortcomings in the way of prosecution, and the civil suit with criminal side needs to be strengthened and so on. Therefore, it is necessary to renew the legislative concept of criminal protection of intellectual property rights, to change the legislative model and to perfect the system of criminal laws and regulations. While ensuring effective protection of the interests of victims, attention should also be paid to the protection of the basic procedural rights of the accused as infringers. ACTA, while reflecting the interests of developed countries, Developing countries have been excluded from the negotiation process of this agreement from the beginning, but China, as a trading power, cannot ignore this agreement aimed at strengthening the enforcement of intellectual property rights and must prepare ahead of time. This paper focuses on how to deal with ACTA and how to protect the criminal protection of intellectual property in our country under the background of ACTA.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.4;D924.3

【参考文献】