中国民法典制定背景下知识产权立法的选择

发布时间：2018-07-10 05:22

本文选题：民法典 + 知识产权法典　；参考：《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：2017年3月《中华人民共和国民法总则》通过,与物权、债权、继承等一样,其对知识产权也进行了概括性规定。对于民法典编纂而言,知识产权与民法典之间采取分离式、纳入式、链接式或者糅合式等4种连接方式的选择,归根到底就是知识产权法整体纳入民法典“入典”独立成编或者是制定专门知识产权法典单独“成典”这两种立法模式的选择。囿于历史和时代局限,近代自然法运动的法典成就在现代社会出现了危机。因应这一危机,需要回归自然理性的法典传统,循着私人生活的形式理性主义建立起统一的私法典。“入典”与“成典”之间,没有第三条道路。知识产权法整体纳入式的“入典”模式,既是知识产权制度自身的体系化,也是现代民法典不断自我完善的过程。
[Abstract]:In March 2017, the General principles of Civil Law of the people's Republic of China were adopted, which, like real right, creditor's rights and inheritance, also made general provisions on intellectual property rights. As for the compilation of civil code, the choice of four ways of connection between intellectual property rights and civil code is separation, integration, linking or blending. In the final analysis, it is the choice of the two legislative models that the intellectual property law should be integrated into the Civil Code and "entered into the Code" independently or the specific intellectual property Code should be formulated separately. Due to the limitation of history and times, the achievements of modern natural law movement appeared crisis in modern society. In response to this crisis, it is necessary to return to the tradition of natural rationality and establish a unified private code following the formal rationalism of private life. There is no third way between "entering the Code" and "becoming the Code." The model of "entering the code" of the whole incorporation of intellectual property law is not only the systematization of intellectual property system itself, but also the process of self-perfection of modern civil code.
【作者单位】：北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】