实用艺术作品与外观设计知识产权保护的重叠与区分
发布时间：2018-07-26 15:50
【摘要】：本文的主要目的是探讨，实用艺术作品与外观设计的区分问题。 伯尔尼公约对实用艺术作品给予保护做出规定，但具体的保护模式并未做统一规定，外观设计也是国际法中明确保护的客体。但各国法律规定并不相同。随着2013年著作权法修改草案的提出，我国形成了著作权法保护实用艺术作品、专利法保护外观设计的局面。但是，实用艺术作品与外观设计之间有很多重叠之处。这种保护方式存在缺陷。 本文主要是通过分析实用艺术作品与外观设计在客体、内容、公共利益政策三个方面的重叠与冲突，提出区分两者的必要性与合理性，并指出从客体的角度、内容的角度、公共政策的角度区分两者的可行性。最后指出我国现在对两者保护的缺陷，，并探讨著作权法修改中应如何协调两者的保护。
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the distinction between practical works of art and design. The Berne Convention provides for the protection of practical works of art, but the specific protection model is not uniform, and the design is also the object of explicit protection in international law. But national laws and regulations are not the same. With the proposal of the revised draft of copyright Law in 2013, the situation of copyright law protecting practical works of art and patent law protecting appearance design has been formed in China. But there is a lot of overlap between a practical work of art and a design. This method of protection is flawed. By analyzing the overlap and conflict between practical art works and appearance design in object, content and public interest policy, this paper puts forward the necessity and rationality of distinguishing them, and points out the angle of object and content. The perspective of public policy distinguishes the feasibility of the two. Finally, this paper points out the defects of the protection of both in our country, and probes into how to coordinate the protection between the two in the revision of copyright law.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
本文编号：2146507
[Abstract]:The main purpose of this paper is to discuss the distinction between practical works of art and design. The Berne Convention provides for the protection of practical works of art, but the specific protection model is not uniform, and the design is also the object of explicit protection in international law. But national laws and regulations are not the same. With the proposal of the revised draft of copyright Law in 2013, the situation of copyright law protecting practical works of art and patent law protecting appearance design has been formed in China. But there is a lot of overlap between a practical work of art and a design. This method of protection is flawed. By analyzing the overlap and conflict between practical art works and appearance design in object, content and public interest policy, this paper puts forward the necessity and rationality of distinguishing them, and points out the angle of object and content. The perspective of public policy distinguishes the feasibility of the two. Finally, this paper points out the defects of the protection of both in our country, and probes into how to coordinate the protection between the two in the revision of copyright law.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 任燕;;对实用艺术作品著作权保护之法律探析——完善我国《著作权法》立法建议[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2009年04期
2 余敏;;论实用艺术作品著作权与外观设计专利权的关系——由人体香水瓶案引发的法律思考[J];科技信息(科学教研);2008年01期
3 张莉莉;全国首届实用艺术作品版权保护交流研讨会综述[J];韶关学院学报(社会科学版);2004年04期
4 姜颖;作品独创性判定标准的比较研究[J];知识产权;2004年03期
5 潘家祥;张心全;;平面转换到立体的著作权问题探析——由两起案例引发的思考[J];知识产权;2008年03期
6 管育鹰;;实用艺术品法律保护路径探析——兼论《著作权法》的修改[J];知识产权;2012年07期
7 张伟君;;实用艺术作品著作权法保护与外观设计专利法保护的协调[J];知识产权;2013年09期
本文编号：2146507
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2146507.html
