知识产权三审合一模式研究
发布时间：2018-07-29 09:42
【摘要】：本选题以知识产权的审判机制为着眼点,通过对国内外研究成果和机制建设进行系统的探求,对我国知识产权审判的三审合一的模式进行了系统的研究。三审合一模式下的知识产权审判机制是对现有的三审分立的审判机制的发展,符合知识产权案件审判的特点,符合我国现阶段知识产权案件审理的要求,有利于诉讼价值的实现。三审合一模式下的知识产权审判机制,是指将知识产权相关的刑事案件、民事案件和以及行政案件,在统一的知识产权庭进行审理,不再根据法院内部职能机构划分和现行的诉讼法规定进行审理。通过对上海、广东和湖南的改革实践的和德国、日本、美国、中国台湾等国家和地区的知识产权审判机制进行分析,得出建立三审合一模式下的知识产权审判机制既是我国司法工作的要求,也是我国实现知识产权案件司法公正的必由之路。但是在我国的三审合一的知识产权审判机制改革实践中也存在着很多的问题。如相关法律法规的缺失、三审合一的知识产权审判法庭建设、“先刑后民”与“先民后刑”理念的矛盾、技术事实查明机制存在缺陷、人才队伍建设落后等方面的问题。在三审合一的知识产权审判机制的建设过程中要注重三审合一知识产权审判机制的法律依据建设、完善三审合一模式下的知识产权审判法庭建设、由传统的“先刑后民”调整到“先民后刑”、加强三审合一模式下的专业技术事实查明机制建设、完善人才培养机制建设。
[Abstract]:This topic focuses on the trial mechanism of intellectual property rights, through the research results and mechanism construction at home and abroad for a systematic exploration, the third trial of intellectual property rights trial mode of integration of a systematic study. The trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of "three trials in one" is the development of the existing trial mechanism of the separation of three trials, which conforms to the characteristics of the trial of intellectual property cases and meets the requirements of the trial of intellectual property cases at the present stage in our country. It is beneficial to the realization of litigation value. The trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of three-trial integration refers to the trial of criminal cases, civil cases and administrative cases related to intellectual property rights in a unified intellectual property court. No longer in accordance with the internal functional division of the court and the existing procedural provisions of the trial. Through the analysis of the reform practices in Shanghai, Guangdong and Hunan and the intellectual property trial mechanisms of Germany, Japan, the United States, Taiwan and other countries and regions, It is not only the requirement of judicial work but also the only way to realize the judicial justice of intellectual property cases in China to establish the trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of "three trials in one". However, there are many problems in the reform of intellectual property trial mechanism. For example, the lack of relevant laws and regulations, the construction of intellectual property trial court with the combination of three trials, the contradiction between "first punishment after people" and "first people after punishment", the defects in the mechanism of finding out the technical facts, the backward construction of talent team, and so on. In the course of the construction of the intellectual property trial mechanism, we should pay attention to the construction of the legal basis of the intellectual property trial mechanism, and perfect the construction of the intellectual property trial court under the mode of triple trial. From the traditional "first punishment before the people" to "the first people after the punishment", we should strengthen the construction of the mechanism of finding out the facts of professional technology under the mode of "three trials in one", and perfect the construction of the talent training mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.4
本文编号：2152277
[Abstract]:This topic focuses on the trial mechanism of intellectual property rights, through the research results and mechanism construction at home and abroad for a systematic exploration, the third trial of intellectual property rights trial mode of integration of a systematic study. The trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of "three trials in one" is the development of the existing trial mechanism of the separation of three trials, which conforms to the characteristics of the trial of intellectual property cases and meets the requirements of the trial of intellectual property cases at the present stage in our country. It is beneficial to the realization of litigation value. The trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of three-trial integration refers to the trial of criminal cases, civil cases and administrative cases related to intellectual property rights in a unified intellectual property court. No longer in accordance with the internal functional division of the court and the existing procedural provisions of the trial. Through the analysis of the reform practices in Shanghai, Guangdong and Hunan and the intellectual property trial mechanisms of Germany, Japan, the United States, Taiwan and other countries and regions, It is not only the requirement of judicial work but also the only way to realize the judicial justice of intellectual property cases in China to establish the trial mechanism of intellectual property under the mode of "three trials in one". However, there are many problems in the reform of intellectual property trial mechanism. For example, the lack of relevant laws and regulations, the construction of intellectual property trial court with the combination of three trials, the contradiction between "first punishment after people" and "first people after punishment", the defects in the mechanism of finding out the technical facts, the backward construction of talent team, and so on. In the course of the construction of the intellectual property trial mechanism, we should pay attention to the construction of the legal basis of the intellectual property trial mechanism, and perfect the construction of the intellectual property trial court under the mode of triple trial. From the traditional "first punishment before the people" to "the first people after the punishment", we should strengthen the construction of the mechanism of finding out the facts of professional technology under the mode of "three trials in one", and perfect the construction of the talent training mechanism.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙海龙;;知识产权审判体制改革的理论思考与路径选择[J];法律适用;2010年09期
2 盛学友;;“三合一”给我们带来了什么——探访上海知识产权“三审合一”新机制[J];法律与生活;2009年24期
3 胡潇潇;;知识产权行政执法与民事诉讼的冲突与协调——以知识产权侵权救济为视角[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2009年03期
4 林广海;;“三审合一”——知识产权案件司法保护新机制述评[J];河北法学;2007年02期
5 傅利英;张晓东;;台湾地区智慧财产法院制度及运作状况述评——兼评与大陆法院试行的“三审合一”模式的区别[J];科技与法律;2009年05期
6 王燕;张军亮;;TRIPS协议下我国知识产权司法保护的新机制探究[J];南华大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期
7 ;国家知识产权战略架构下的司法保护[J];人民司法;2009年11期
8 易健雄;;知识产权诉讼中的专家证人制度[J];人民司法;2009年11期
9 戴建志;;评江苏基层法院的知识产权审判[J];人民司法;2010年01期
10 高远;;咨询专家助阵知识产权审判[J];上海人大月刊;2010年01期
，本文编号：2152277
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2152277.html
