知识产权诉前证据保全问题研究

发布时间：2018-08-01 19:04

【摘要】：知识产权证据具有隐蔽性、易逝性和技术性等特点，当事人取证有较大的难度，人民法院是否采取证据保全措施成为了当事人能否胜诉的关键。在我国最新修订的《民事诉讼法》明确了诉前证据保全这一规定，最高人民法院《关于诉讼证据的若干规定》（以下简称《证据规定》）、《专利法》、《著作权法》、《商标法》等均对诉前证据保全相关内容做出相应的规定，但不完善，无法适应当下知识产权的迅猛发展，对相应的权利保护不到位。笔者通过一个具体案例引出诉前证据保全对知识产权诉讼的重要性，从而说明研究目的和意义，简述国内外目前对诉前证据保全制度的研究。首先对诉前证据保全的界定和介绍其功能，其次对域外诉前证据保全的分析，接着分析我国目前对诉前证据保全的法律规定，再从这一程序中的几个方面内容进行具体分析，然后从知识产权领域上去分析我国目前在申请人的范围过窄、申请的条件和审查标准不细化、实施保全的主体和时限的问题的欠缺、担保的规定和数额未明确和保全的方法不完善几方面的问题，，最后就以上的问题提出完善的建议。
[Abstract]:The evidence of intellectual property rights has the characteristics of concealment, perishable and technicality, and it is difficult for the parties to obtain evidence. Whether the people's court adopts evidence preservation measures has become the key to whether the party can win the lawsuit. In the newly revised Civil procedure Law of China, the provisions on preservation of evidence before litigation are clearly defined. The provisions of the Supreme people's Court on evidence in Litigation (hereinafter referred to as "evidence provisions"), the Patent Law, the copyright Law, and the Trademark Law all make corresponding provisions on the preservation of evidence before litigation, but they are not perfect. Unable to adapt to the current rapid development of intellectual property rights, the protection of the corresponding rights is not in place. The author introduces the importance of the preservation of pre-lawsuit evidence to intellectual property litigation through a specific case, and explains the purpose and significance of the research, and briefly describes the current research on the system of preservation of pre-lawsuit evidence at home and abroad. First of all, the definition and function of pre-lawsuit evidence preservation is defined and introduced. Secondly, the analysis of extra-territorial pre-litigation evidence preservation is carried out. Then, the current legal provisions of pre-lawsuit evidence preservation in China are analyzed, and then several aspects of this procedure are analyzed concretely. Then, from the aspect of intellectual property rights, we analyze that the scope of the applicants in our country is too narrow, the conditions of the application and the criteria for examination are not refined, the main body and the time limit for the implementation of preservation are lacking. The stipulation and amount of guarantee are not clear and the method of preservation is not perfect. Finally, some suggestions are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.4

【参考文献】