知识产权许可不公平高价的反垄断规制
发布时间：2018-08-13 18:31
【摘要】：反垄断法禁止的不公平高价格仅限于由于制度性原因造成的,长期可持续进入壁垒保护下的垄断企业过高定价行为,反垄断法并不禁止一般知识产权许可高价格。但在标准必要专利的情况下,违背FRAND许可承诺的不合理高许可费是一种伤害竞争的滥用市场支配地位行为,应该受到反垄断法的禁止。在反垄断审查当中,对于FRAND合理许可费的判定应该综合考虑专利的事前递增价值贡献和在标准多个互补专利中的价值贡献比例,并根据个案采用科学的计算方法来确定,从而实现防止专利劫持和许可费叠加的目标。
[Abstract]:The unfair high price prohibited by antimonopoly law is limited to the excessive pricing behavior of monopoly enterprises under the protection of long-term sustainable entry barriers due to institutional reasons. Anti-monopoly law does not prohibit the general intellectual property rights license high price. However, in the case of standard necessary patent, the unreasonable high license fee which violates the promise of FRAND license is an abuse of market dominant position, which is harmful to competition, and should be prohibited by antimonopoly law. In the antitrust examination, the reasonable license fee for FRAND should be determined by considering the contribution of increasing patent value in advance and the proportion of value contribution in standard multiple complementary patents, and the scientific calculation method should be used to determine the case. In order to achieve the goal of preventing patent hijacking and license fee superposition.
【作者单位】： 浙江财经大学经济学院;
【分类号】：D997.1
本文编号：2181823
[Abstract]:The unfair high price prohibited by antimonopoly law is limited to the excessive pricing behavior of monopoly enterprises under the protection of long-term sustainable entry barriers due to institutional reasons. Anti-monopoly law does not prohibit the general intellectual property rights license high price. However, in the case of standard necessary patent, the unreasonable high license fee which violates the promise of FRAND license is an abuse of market dominant position, which is harmful to competition, and should be prohibited by antimonopoly law. In the antitrust examination, the reasonable license fee for FRAND should be determined by considering the contribution of increasing patent value in advance and the proportion of value contribution in standard multiple complementary patents, and the scientific calculation method should be used to determine the case. In order to achieve the goal of preventing patent hijacking and license fee superposition.
【作者单位】： 浙江财经大学经济学院;
【分类号】：D997.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 ;许可费的计算[J];科技经济市场;1999年04期
2 伊从宽,姜姗;国际反垄断政策的发展态势[J];外国法译评;1997年03期
3 张素伦;;欧盟互联网行业反垄断政策及对我国的启示[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2013年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 孙东顺;国际贸易中标准必要专利的法律规制[D];华东政法大学;2015年
，本文编号：2181823
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2181823.html
教材专著
