论我国商标权质押法律制度的完善

发布时间：2018-08-14 16:35

【摘要】：商标权质押是指商标权人以商标权为出质标的将该商标权质押,当商标权出质人到期无法履行债务时,商标权质权人可以以出质商标的价值优先受偿。商标权质押具有不移转标的物、出质标的价值较大、出质资源丰富等优点,对中小企业的融资,高新企业的融资有着巨大的帮助。商标权质押担保已成为许多国家知识产权融资担保的重要方式之一。我国知识产权担保体系发展起步较晚,虽然在《物权法》、《担保法》等相关法律法规中明确规定了商标权质押的基本原则和相关的法律制度,但法律规定不具体过于空泛,在实践中难以具体操作。我国的商标权质押制度尚处于起步阶段,在商标权质押制度的立法、质押当事人的权利义务划分、商标权的价值评估方法、风险防范以及价值变现方式等方面还存在许多问题和缺陷,因此,对其进行研究具有重大的理论和现实意义。本文在分析我国商标权质押的现状和存在的问题的基础上,运用比较法、举例法,将发达国家和我国的商标权质押制度进行对比分析,指出我国当前商标权质押制度的缺陷,从而提出完善我国商标权质押制度的若干具体对策和立法建议。文章共分四个章节：第一章从权利质押的概念和特点分析出商标权质押的概念和特点,认为商标权质押是权利质押的一种,商标权质押较之其他类型的质押有自己的特征。阐述商标权质押在设立时无需占有和转移无形财产,商标权质押制度具有较高的风险性。第二章从我国商标权质押立法的背景展开阐述,我国现在商标权质押担保的立法现状,分析得出我国商标权质押制度本身存在的缺陷与商标权质押配套制度的不健全等问题是阻碍我国商标权质押制度发展的主要原因。第三章论述了大陆法系国家和英美法系国家商标权质押的法律规定及其借鉴。该部分从比较法的角度切入,对大陆法系代表国家和地区法国、德国、日本、我国台湾地区,英美法系代表国家美国、英国的商标权质押立法规定进行了考察和评价,通过比较分析,提出国外商标权质押立法对我国的启示。第四章提出完善我国商标权质押制度的建议。这是本文的核心章节。首先从立法的角度,明确商标权质押公示制度中登记生效主义应改为登记产生主义；明确不同的商标类型能否作为商标权质押担保的对象；其次明确商标权质押法律关系中各主体的权利义务；再次明确商标权的最高额质押和转质制度的变化和规定；最后完善商标权质押期对商标的有效监管,以及如何完善商标权质押配套制度进行具体论述。
[Abstract]:The pledge of trademark right means that the trademark owner pledge the trademark right with the trademark right as the pledge object. When the mortgagor of the trademark right is unable to perform the debt at maturity, the mortgagor of the trademark right can give priority to the repayment with the value of the pledged trademark. The pledge of trademark rights has the advantages of not transferring the subject matter, the value of the pledge is larger, and the pledge resources are abundant, which is of great help to the financing of small and medium-sized enterprises and the financing of high-tech enterprises. The pledge of trademark rights has become one of the important ways of intellectual property financing guarantee in many countries. The development of intellectual property guarantee system in China is relatively late. Although the basic principles and relevant legal systems of pledge of trademark rights are clearly stipulated in the relevant laws and regulations, such as the property Law and the guarantee Law, the legal provisions are not too general. It is difficult to operate in practice. The pledge system of trademark right in our country is still in its infancy. In the legislation of pledge system of trademark right, the division of rights and obligations of the pledge party, the evaluation method of trademark right value, There are still many problems and defects in risk prevention and value realization, so it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study it. On the basis of analyzing the present situation and existing problems of the pledge of trademark rights in our country, this paper applies the method of comparison and examples, compares the pledge system of trademark rights between developed countries and our country, and points out the defects of the current system of pledge of trademark rights in our country. Some concrete countermeasures and legislative suggestions are put forward to perfect the pledge system of trademark rights in China. The article is divided into four chapters: the first chapter analyzes the concept and characteristics of the pledge of trademark rights from the concept and characteristics of pledge of rights, and holds that the pledge of trademark rights is a kind of pledge of rights, and the pledge of trademark rights has its own characteristics compared with other types of pledge. This paper expounds that the pledge of trademark right does not need to possess and transfer intangible property when it is set up, and the pledge system of trademark right has a high risk. The second chapter from our country trademark right pledge legislation background, our country now trademark right pledge guarantee legislation present situation, It is concluded that the defects of the pledge system of trademark rights and the imperfection of the matching system of the pledge of trademark rights are the main reasons that hinder the development of the pledge system of trademark rights in China. The third chapter discusses the legal provisions and reference of trademark pledge in civil law countries and common law countries. From the perspective of comparative law, this part makes an investigation and evaluation of the legal provisions of the civil law system representing the countries and regions of France, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, the United States and the United Kingdom. Through comparative analysis, this paper puts forward the enlightenment of foreign trademark pledge legislation to our country. The fourth chapter puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the pledge system of trademark right in our country. This is the core chapter of this paper. First of all, from the legislative point of view, it is clear that the registration effectivism should be changed into the register producing doctrine in the trademark right pledge publicity system, and whether different trademark types can be used as the object of the trademark right pledge guarantee; Secondly, it clarifies the rights and obligations of each subject in the legal relationship of trademark right pledge; clarifies once again the changes and regulations of the maximum amount of trademark pledge and the system of transfer pledge; finally, consummates the effective supervision of trademark during the pledge period of trademark right. And how to perfect the supporting system of trademark right pledge is discussed in detail.
【学位授予单位】：福州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】