视频分享网站著作权间接侵权责任问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-26 13:20
【摘要】：著作权间接侵权行为是行为人没有实施受知识产权专有权利控制的行为,但却为他人实施侵害专有权利的行为提供帮助或者教唆、引诱他人实施侵害专有权利的行为。实施间接侵权行为,导致直接侵权行为发生并造成损害后果,应当承担间接侵权责任。 确立间接侵权制度,清晰界定间接侵权行为及间接侵权责任,对视频分享网站服务提供者等的网络服务提供者在提供网络服务时的权利义务通过完整规范的理论体系予以界定,不仅是保障数字环境下著作权人和相关邻接权人的基础权利的必要条件,更是网络服务提供者履行相关责任的前提。间接侵权不同于直接侵权和共同侵权,在内容、因果关系、责任承担和立法适用上与直接侵权和共同侵权均有本质的差别。网络的无缝传播和侵权后果的不可逆性,是确立著作权间接侵权制度的环境背景；侵权责任法对侵权行为的规制范围在社会经济发展和司法实践中不断扩大,是确立间接侵权制度的历史背景。 对视频分享网站的间接侵权行为的规制,应当注重版权保护与技术革新之间的平衡,避免给予网络服务提供者过重的责任。视频分享网站服务提供者承担“善良管理人”的注意义务,行为人应当具有其所属行业或职业、专业资格等对其行为的客观性要求。同时,结合中国特色的版权保护体制,适当采用行政措施来缓解侵权纠纷为网络视频行业造成的困扰。在著作权责任限制方面,“避风港规则”是抗辩事由,而非免责事由。适用“避风港规则”进行抗辩的前提其在明知或者应知侵权视频内容后积极采取必要措施。另外,对“避风港规则”的具体适用条件应当做明确具体的限制性规定。
[Abstract]:The indirect infringement of copyright is an act by which the perpetrator does not carry out the control of the exclusive right of intellectual property, but provides aid or abetting for others to infringe upon the exclusive right, and induces others to carry out the act of infringing upon the exclusive right. Indirect tort shall be liable for indirect tort, which results in direct tort and damages. Establish the system of indirect infringement, clearly define the indirect tort and indirect tort liability, and define the rights and obligations of network service providers such as video-sharing website service providers through a complete normative theoretical system. It is not only a necessary condition to protect the basic rights of copyright owners and related neighbors in the digital environment, but also a prerequisite for network service providers to fulfill their relevant responsibilities. Indirect tort is different from direct tort and joint tort. It is essentially different from direct tort and joint tort in content, causality, liability and application of legislation. The seamless dissemination of the network and irreversibility of the consequences of infringement are the environmental background of establishing the system of indirect copyright infringement, and the scope of tort regulation by tort liability law is constantly expanded in the development of social economy and judicial practice. It is the historical background of establishing indirect tort system. To regulate the indirect infringement of video-sharing website, we should pay attention to the balance between copyright protection and technological innovation, and avoid giving too much responsibility to network service providers. The service provider of video sharing website undertakes the duty of attention of "good administrator", and the actor should have the objectivity requirement of his or her own profession or occupation, professional qualification and so on. At the same time, combined with the copyright protection system with Chinese characteristics, appropriate administrative measures are adopted to alleviate the troubles caused by infringement disputes for the network video industry. In the limitation of copyright liability, the Haven Rule is a defense, not an exemption. The premise of applying the "safe haven rule" is to take necessary measures after knowing or should know about the infringing video content. In addition, the specific application conditions of the safe harbour rules should be clearly defined and restricted.
【学位授予单位】：北京邮电大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
本文编号：2204982
[Abstract]:The indirect infringement of copyright is an act by which the perpetrator does not carry out the control of the exclusive right of intellectual property, but provides aid or abetting for others to infringe upon the exclusive right, and induces others to carry out the act of infringing upon the exclusive right. Indirect tort shall be liable for indirect tort, which results in direct tort and damages. Establish the system of indirect infringement, clearly define the indirect tort and indirect tort liability, and define the rights and obligations of network service providers such as video-sharing website service providers through a complete normative theoretical system. It is not only a necessary condition to protect the basic rights of copyright owners and related neighbors in the digital environment, but also a prerequisite for network service providers to fulfill their relevant responsibilities. Indirect tort is different from direct tort and joint tort. It is essentially different from direct tort and joint tort in content, causality, liability and application of legislation. The seamless dissemination of the network and irreversibility of the consequences of infringement are the environmental background of establishing the system of indirect copyright infringement, and the scope of tort regulation by tort liability law is constantly expanded in the development of social economy and judicial practice. It is the historical background of establishing indirect tort system. To regulate the indirect infringement of video-sharing website, we should pay attention to the balance between copyright protection and technological innovation, and avoid giving too much responsibility to network service providers. The service provider of video sharing website undertakes the duty of attention of "good administrator", and the actor should have the objectivity requirement of his or her own profession or occupation, professional qualification and so on. At the same time, combined with the copyright protection system with Chinese characteristics, appropriate administrative measures are adopted to alleviate the troubles caused by infringement disputes for the network video industry. In the limitation of copyright liability, the Haven Rule is a defense, not an exemption. The premise of applying the "safe haven rule" is to take necessary measures after knowing or should know about the infringing video content. In addition, the specific application conditions of the safe harbour rules should be clearly defined and restricted.
【学位授予单位】：北京邮电大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李欲晓;;互联网治理与信息社会法律的研究对象和目标[J];北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
2 胡坚;美国保护知识产权的新动向——评美国《司法部知识产权工作组报告》[J];电子知识产权;2005年05期
3 芮松艳;;视频分享网站的侵权责任认定——由华夏树人诉优酷网案着手[J];电子知识产权;2009年04期
4 王迁;;视频分享网站著作权侵权问题研究[J];法商研究;2008年04期
5 吴汉东;;侵权责任法视野下的网络侵权责任解析[J];法商研究;2010年06期
6 王迁;;论版权“间接侵权”及其规则的法定化[J];法学;2005年12期
7 胡开忠;;“避风港规则”在视频分享网站版权侵权认定中的适用[J];法学;2009年12期
8 牛强;;变动的注意义务:视频分享网站过失评判的新范式[J];法治研究;2010年01期
9 谢惠加;;试论著作权间接侵权规则的法定化——兼论著作权间接侵权规则的经济分析[J];河北法学;2007年02期
10 杨利华,冯晓青;著作权扩张及其法律和经济学探讨[J];法学论坛;2005年03期
，本文编号：2204982
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2204982.html
