瑞士专利诉讼制度改革及其对我国的启示

发布时间：2018-10-05 16:16

【摘要】：在知识经济和全球化背景下，世界范围内的知识产权纠纷越来越多，且由于科技分工更加细化引起了知识产权专业化程度加深，进一步加大了知识产权纠纷的解决难度。因此，，知识产权诉讼专门化成为发达国家的共同选择，以满足日益增长的知识产权纠纷的专业化要求。不久前，瑞士为提高本国专利诉讼的专业化水平以增强其在欧洲专利诉讼系统中的竞争力，进行了大规模的专利诉讼制度改革。而我国在面临国际新形势下，要满足知识产权保护的需求时，知识产权诉讼专门化亦成为知识产权诉讼制度改革的首选之举。这里的知识产权诉讼专门化，有“三审合一”制度和构建知识产权专门法院两种路径。鉴于我国的知识产权诉讼制度建设历史较短，相对于欧美国家来说经验不足，目前尚未形成成型的理论体系，因此在全球化背景下，借鉴国外先进经验也不失为一种加快建设我国知识产权诉讼制度的行之有效的措施。首先，本文通过对瑞士专利诉讼改革所涉及到的各方面的程序制度的分析，包括审判主体的组织结构分析、诉讼程序的结构分析等，详细探析瑞士专利诉讼改革的法律实践运作，以便借鉴其理论与实践经验。然后，本文通过分析我国现行的“三审合一”改革模式的现状，结合我国的国情和面临的国际环境，分析我国知识产权诉讼改革中的不足，以借鉴瑞士的专利诉讼制度改革，探索具有中国特色的知识产权诉讼制度。最后，针对中国的现实情况，以及结合国内学者对我国知识产权诉讼专门化研究所取得的成果，从完善审判组织、建立技术专家陪审员制度两个方面提出了改革建议，本文期望探索一种符合中国国情的知识产权诉讼模式，以此来提高我国知识产权诉讼审判的质量与效率，并快速地推进我国知识产权战略的发展。
[Abstract]:Under the background of knowledge economy and globalization, there are more and more intellectual property disputes in the world, and the specialization degree of intellectual property rights is deepened because of the more detailed division of science and technology, which further increases the difficulty of resolving intellectual property disputes. Therefore, the specialization of intellectual property litigation is the common choice of developed countries to meet the increasing demand of specialization of intellectual property disputes. Not long ago, Switzerland undertook a large-scale reform of its patent litigation system in order to improve its specialization in patent litigation in Europe to enhance its competitiveness in the European patent litigation system. Under the new international situation, the specialization of intellectual property litigation has become the first choice in the reform of intellectual property litigation system. There are two ways of specialization of intellectual property litigation: the system of "triple trial in one" and the construction of special court of intellectual property. In view of the short history of intellectual property litigation system construction in China, the lack of experience compared with the European and American countries, and the fact that a theoretical system has not yet been formed, so in the context of globalization, Drawing lessons from foreign advanced experience is an effective measure to speed up the construction of intellectual property litigation system in China. First of all, through the analysis of the procedural system involved in the reform of Swiss patent litigation, including the analysis of the organizational structure of the trial subject, the structure analysis of the proceedings, etc. This paper analyzes the legal practice of patent litigation reform in Switzerland in order to draw lessons from its theoretical and practical experience. Then, by analyzing the current situation of the reform mode of "three trials in one" in our country, combining the national conditions of our country and the international environment, this paper analyzes the shortcomings in the reform of intellectual property litigation in our country, in order to learn from the reform of patent litigation system in Switzerland. Explore the intellectual property litigation system with Chinese characteristics. Finally, in view of the reality of China and the achievements made by domestic scholars in the specialized research of intellectual property litigation in China, the author puts forward some suggestions for reform from two aspects: perfecting the trial organization and establishing the system of technical expert jurors. This paper hopes to explore a mode of intellectual property litigation in accordance with China's national conditions, so as to improve the quality and efficiency of intellectual property litigation in China, and to promote the development of intellectual property strategy in China.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.42;D925

【参考文献】