对正泰诉施耐德专利侵权案的案例分析
发布时间：2018-11-25 08:24
【摘要】：正泰诉施耐德专利侵权案不仅案情重大,而且全面展现了专利侵权诉讼中的审判程序及法律适用问题,其间涉及的诸多专业问题和诉讼技巧对国内企业进行跨国知识产权诉讼具有重要的参考意义。因此,对本案进行整理、思考和研究,在中国将知识产权作为战略发展规划的今天,具有重要的理论和实务价值。 本文旨在研究该案中反映出的重要法律问题,主要涉及以下几点：无效宣告导致的诉讼中止问题、专利保护范围如何确定的问题、抵触申请抗辩的问题以及现有技术抗辩中的技术比对问题。专利侵权纠纷中不构成侵权或不承担赔偿责任的抗辩事由有很多,本文着眼于抵触申请抗辩这种新型的抗辩方式,从法律依据和法理依据两个层面对其进行分析研究。以往的研究者多将抵触申请抗辩命名为“在先专利抗辩”并归入现有技术抗辩中,本文首次将其命名为“抵触申请抗辩”,并对其进行了独立研究,因此本部分是本文的创新点,也是本文的研究重点。另外,本文在结合具体案情、研究相关理论的基础上,对我国专利诉讼实践中存在的一些法律适用问题进行了批判,并有针对性的提出了几点完善建议。
[Abstract]:The case of Zhengtai v. Schneider for patent infringement is not only of great importance, but also shows the problems of trial procedure and legal application in patent infringement litigation. Many professional issues and litigation skills involved in the process have important reference significance for domestic enterprises in transnational intellectual property litigation. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical value to organize, think and study this case, which regards intellectual property as a strategic development plan in China today. The purpose of this paper is to study the important legal issues reflected in the case, mainly involving the following points: the suspension of proceedings resulting from the declaration of invalidation, the question of how to determine the scope of patent protection, Conflicts with the application of the defense and the existing technical defense of the technical comparison problem. There are many reasons why patent infringement disputes do not constitute infringement or do not bear liability for compensation. This paper focuses on the defense of conflict application, which is a new type of defense, and analyzes and studies it from two aspects: legal basis and legal basis. In the past, most researchers named the defense of conflict application as "prior patent defense" and classified it as the defense of prior technology. This paper first named it "defense of conflict application", and carried out an independent study on it. Therefore, this part is the innovation of this article, but also the focus of this paper. In addition, on the basis of studying the relevant theories, this paper criticizes some legal application problems existing in the practice of patent litigation in our country, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect them.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
本文编号：2355440
[Abstract]:The case of Zhengtai v. Schneider for patent infringement is not only of great importance, but also shows the problems of trial procedure and legal application in patent infringement litigation. Many professional issues and litigation skills involved in the process have important reference significance for domestic enterprises in transnational intellectual property litigation. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical value to organize, think and study this case, which regards intellectual property as a strategic development plan in China today. The purpose of this paper is to study the important legal issues reflected in the case, mainly involving the following points: the suspension of proceedings resulting from the declaration of invalidation, the question of how to determine the scope of patent protection, Conflicts with the application of the defense and the existing technical defense of the technical comparison problem. There are many reasons why patent infringement disputes do not constitute infringement or do not bear liability for compensation. This paper focuses on the defense of conflict application, which is a new type of defense, and analyzes and studies it from two aspects: legal basis and legal basis. In the past, most researchers named the defense of conflict application as "prior patent defense" and classified it as the defense of prior technology. This paper first named it "defense of conflict application", and carried out an independent study on it. Therefore, this part is the innovation of this article, but also the focus of this paper. In addition, on the basis of studying the relevant theories, this paper criticizes some legal application problems existing in the practice of patent litigation in our country, and puts forward some suggestions to perfect them.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 和育东;;专利侵权赔偿中的技术分摊难题——从美国废除专利侵权“非法获利”赔偿说起[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2009年03期
2 崔立红;;我国专利无效宣告之司法审查与程序价值[J];东岳论丛;2012年05期
3 顾韬;;论在先专利抗辩的适用——兼评在先专利与新颖性[J];中国发明与专利;2006年05期
4 范晓宇;;专利侵权损害赔偿的要件及其举证责任——以《侵权责任法》为切入点[J];法学杂志;2012年01期
5 李新芝;谭红;;专利无效宣告程序中专利文件的修改[J];法律适用;2012年08期
6 左萌;;专利侵权中的惩罚性赔偿[J];电子知识产权;2012年10期
7 张玲;纪璐;;美国专利侵权惩罚性赔偿制度及其启示[J];法学杂志;2013年02期
8 尹锋林;曹鹏飞;;美国云计算专利侵权规则及对我国的借鉴意义[J];电子知识产权;2013年06期
9 贺宁馨;袁晓东;;我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度有效性的实证研究[J];科研管理;2012年04期
10 谭筱清;已有公知技术抗辩原则在专利侵权诉讼中的运用[J];人民司法;2002年08期
，本文编号：2355440
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2355440.html
