论知识产权争议的可仲裁性
发布时间：2018-12-08 13:48
【摘要】：知识产权争议的可仲裁性问题一直是阻碍知识产权争议通过仲裁解决的巨大障碍。理论界有很多的专家学者认为知识产权是一项公权属性的私权利，国家存在专门的知识产权确权机构，如果允许知识产权争议通过仲裁方式解决的话就会对这些国家机构的机能造成损害，同时错误的裁决结果也会对社会公共利益造成损害。而笔者经过研究论证后认为，知识产权争议的仲裁解决非但不会对社会公共利益造成损害，相反还会对知识产权事业的发展起到推动作用，有利于保护知识产权权利人的合法权利。本文撰写共有四章，分别从争议的可仲裁性、国内外立法体系以及我国制度构建等多个角度对知识产权争议可仲裁性做出论证和分析。 本文第一章主要内容是对争议可仲裁性问题概述，，笔者对争议的可仲裁性进行理论界定，进而提出争议的可仲裁性可以按照其性质分为主客观两方面可仲裁性，接着探讨一项争议要具备可仲裁性所必须的基本要素。最后阐述和列举世界各国在争议可仲裁性方面所采取的立法体系。本文第二章主要对世界各国知识产权争议可仲裁性的立法态度进行分类，在世界各国中美国、瑞士对知识产权争议仲裁全面支持；英国、德国、法国等国家采取的是有条件的支持态度。知识产权争议可仲裁范围的不断扩大已经是全世界所不可逆转的趋势。本文第二章还将知识产权争议的类型划分为合同型、侵权型和有效性争议，并依次对上述几种类型争议的可仲裁性做出分析。本文第三章将重点介绍知识产权有效性争议的可仲裁性,许多专家学者认为由于知识产权是一项影响社会公共利益的权利并且存在专门的知识产权确权机构，所以知识产权有效性争议并不适宜通过仲裁的方式解决。在该章中笔者将会对上述观点进行分析和批判，从理论和案例两个角度来论证知识产权有效性争议的可仲裁性。本文第四章将会结合我国国情对知识产权争议可仲裁性在我国的发展提出一些建议，在本章中会对现阶段我国有关知识产权争议可仲裁性的相关法律制度和仲裁规则进行阐述和分析。笔者认为我国立法应当明确规定知识产权争议的可仲裁性范围,并实现制度和人才培养两方面的国际接轨。
[Abstract]:The arbitrability of intellectual property disputes has been an obstacle to the settlement of intellectual property disputes. There are many experts and scholars in the theoretical circle who believe that intellectual property is a private right with the attribute of public power, and that there are specialized institutions for confirming the right of intellectual property in the country. Allowing intellectual property disputes to be settled by arbitration would damage the functioning of these national institutions and the public interest would be harmed by erroneous decisions. After studying and demonstrating, the author believes that the arbitration settlement of intellectual property disputes will not harm the public interest, but on the contrary will promote the development of intellectual property rights. It is conducive to the protection of the legal rights of the holders of intellectual property rights. There are four chapters in this paper, which demonstrate and analyze the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes from the perspectives of the arbitrability of disputes, the domestic and foreign legislative system and the construction of our country's system. In the first chapter, the author defines the arbitrability of disputes theoretically, and then points out that the arbitrability of disputes can be divided into two aspects according to its nature. Then it discusses the basic elements necessary for a dispute to have arbitrability. In the end, the legislative system adopted by countries all over the world in dispute arbitrability is expounded and listed. In the second chapter, the author classifies the legislative attitude of the countries in the world on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes. In the world, the United States and Switzerland fully support the arbitration of intellectual property disputes. Britain, Germany, France and other countries have adopted a conditional attitude of support. The expansion of the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes is an irreversible trend all over the world. In the second chapter, the types of intellectual property disputes are divided into contract type, tort type and validity dispute, and the arbitrability of the above types of disputes is analyzed in turn. The third chapter will focus on the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property rights. Many experts and scholars believe that intellectual property rights are a right that affects the public interest of society and that there are specialized institutions for the confirmation of intellectual property rights. Therefore, the validity of intellectual property disputes is not suitable for arbitration. In this chapter, the author will analyze and criticize the above views, and prove the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property from two angles of theory and case. The fourth chapter will put forward some suggestions on the development of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China. In this chapter, the relevant legal system and arbitration rules on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China are expounded and analyzed. The author thinks that the legislation of our country should clearly stipulate the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes and realize the international integration of system and talent training.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
本文编号：2368466
[Abstract]:The arbitrability of intellectual property disputes has been an obstacle to the settlement of intellectual property disputes. There are many experts and scholars in the theoretical circle who believe that intellectual property is a private right with the attribute of public power, and that there are specialized institutions for confirming the right of intellectual property in the country. Allowing intellectual property disputes to be settled by arbitration would damage the functioning of these national institutions and the public interest would be harmed by erroneous decisions. After studying and demonstrating, the author believes that the arbitration settlement of intellectual property disputes will not harm the public interest, but on the contrary will promote the development of intellectual property rights. It is conducive to the protection of the legal rights of the holders of intellectual property rights. There are four chapters in this paper, which demonstrate and analyze the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes from the perspectives of the arbitrability of disputes, the domestic and foreign legislative system and the construction of our country's system. In the first chapter, the author defines the arbitrability of disputes theoretically, and then points out that the arbitrability of disputes can be divided into two aspects according to its nature. Then it discusses the basic elements necessary for a dispute to have arbitrability. In the end, the legislative system adopted by countries all over the world in dispute arbitrability is expounded and listed. In the second chapter, the author classifies the legislative attitude of the countries in the world on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes. In the world, the United States and Switzerland fully support the arbitration of intellectual property disputes. Britain, Germany, France and other countries have adopted a conditional attitude of support. The expansion of the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes is an irreversible trend all over the world. In the second chapter, the types of intellectual property disputes are divided into contract type, tort type and validity dispute, and the arbitrability of the above types of disputes is analyzed in turn. The third chapter will focus on the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property rights. Many experts and scholars believe that intellectual property rights are a right that affects the public interest of society and that there are specialized institutions for the confirmation of intellectual property rights. Therefore, the validity of intellectual property disputes is not suitable for arbitration. In this chapter, the author will analyze and criticize the above views, and prove the arbitrability of the validity of intellectual property from two angles of theory and case. The fourth chapter will put forward some suggestions on the development of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China. In this chapter, the relevant legal system and arbitration rules on the arbitrability of intellectual property disputes in China are expounded and analyzed. The author thinks that the legislation of our country should clearly stipulate the scope of arbitrability of intellectual property disputes and realize the international integration of system and talent training.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李正华;中美知识产权制度比较研究[J];比较法研究;2003年02期
2 罗东川;;国家知识产权战略背景下的知识产权司法保护[J];法律适用;2006年04期
3 吴友明;论知识产权仲裁[J];法学评论;1999年04期
4 何艳华;;质疑与回应:国际商事仲裁的保密性[J];法治研究;2010年09期
5 邹林X;;论争议可仲裁性的概念与性质[J];公民与法(法学版);2011年11期
6 徐琳;;国际商事仲裁裁决承认与执行中的公共政策[J];河北法学;2009年07期
7 马德才;论国际商事仲裁中争议事项的可仲裁性问题[J];江西财经大学学报;2000年03期
8 倪静;;论知识产权有效性争议的可仲裁性——对公共政策理由的反思[J];江西社会科学;2012年02期
9 李晓桃;袁晓东;;知识产权纠纷的可仲裁性研究[J];科技管理研究;2012年16期
10 吴汉东;关于知识产权私权属性的再认识——兼评“知识产权公权化”理论[J];社会科学;2005年10期
本文编号：2368466
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2368466.html
