背景音乐使用收费制度研究

发布时间:2019-02-13 01:01
【摘要】: 背景音乐收费制度的启动是我国自新修订的《著作权法》颁布之后,一项颇为引人注目的旨在保护著作权人合法权益的举措。应当承认,从保障权利人利益的角度来说,我国背景音乐收费制度的实施已经大大晚于西方发达国家,,其中既有制度的原因、立法的原因,也有人们观念上的原因。而要确立背景音乐收费制度的合理性与合法性,除了相关法律制度配套建设之外,人们传统观念的改变是也同样是非常必要的。这首先要求我们将著作权理解为一种私权,而背景音乐的播放作为使用有著作权的音乐作品的一种形式,是受著作权法律规制与保护的。营利性场所将有著作权保护的音乐作品作为背景音乐播放本身就是一种营利行为,所以权利人要求支付许可使用费是天经地义的。 文章第二部分的内容涉及到背景音乐许可使用费收取对象的界定以及使用费标准的性质和数额确定的问题。这一部分以许可使用费标准为重,不仅涉及到标准的具体内容,特别涉及到了对标准性质,即背景音乐使用收费行为的性质如何理解的问题。文章首先指出,背景音乐收费行为的本质是民事行为,进而阐述了背景音乐收费标准的性质,即背景音乐的收费标准不是行政法规,而仅仅是双方协商的基础。 第三部分主要讨论背景音乐许可使用费请求权的行使。这一部分首先简要介绍了当前我国的著作权集体管理组织,然后重点论述著作权集体管理组织与收费对象之间的权利义务关系,其中包括了著作权集体管理组织行使权利的依据,即权力的来源,以及双方争议解决制度等内容。 文章的最后一个部分为许可使用费收取后如何在权利人之间分配的问题。这一部分包括了两个内容:一是作者之间的收益分配,二是邻接权人在收益分配中的地位。由于邻接权人的合法权益在背景音乐收费制度中较容易被忽视,所以如何实现录音者、表演者的利益是完善背景音乐收费制度的重要内容。 我国的背景音乐使用收费制度的完善实际上涉及到了我国整个著作权制度有关音乐作品著作权内容的制度建设,比如著作权集体管理制度的完善就不仅仅只是一个背景音乐使用收费制度所要解决的问题,而涉及到了整个著作权立法的完善。在这一过程中,无论是观念还是立法的进步,都不是一个轻松的过程。
[Abstract]:Background the initiation of music charging system is a remarkable measure to protect the legitimate rights and interests of copyright owners after the newly revised copyright Law was promulgated in China. It should be acknowledged that from the perspective of protecting the interests of the obligee, the implementation of the background music fee system in China has been much later than that in the western developed countries, including the reasons of the system, the reason of legislation, and the reason of people's idea. In order to establish the rationality and legitimacy of the background music charging system, it is also necessary to change people's traditional concepts in addition to the related legal system. This requires us to understand copyright as a private right, and the play of background music is regulated and protected by copyright law as a form of using copyrighted musical works. It is a profitable act for for-profit places to play music works protected by copyright as background music, so it is natural for the obligee to demand the payment of royalties. The second part of the article involves the definition of the object of background music license fee collection and the determination of the nature and amount of the user fee standard. This part focuses on the licensing fee standard, not only the specific content of the standard, especially about the standard nature, that is, the nature of the background music use charge behavior how to understand. Firstly, the paper points out that the nature of background music charging is civil behavior, and then expounds the nature of background music charging standard, that is, the background music charging standard is not administrative regulations, but only the basis of negotiation between the two sides. The third part mainly discusses the application of background music license fee. This part first briefly introduces the copyright collective management organization in our country, and then focuses on the relationship between the copyright collective management organization and the charging object. It includes the basis of the exercise of the rights of the copyright collective management organization, namely the source of the power, and the dispute settlement system between the two sides. The last part of the article is about how to distribute the royalties among the right holders. This part includes two parts: one is the income distribution between the author and the other is the position of the neighbor in the income distribution. Because the legitimate rights and interests of the neighboring rights and interests in the background music fee system is easy to be ignored, so how to achieve recording, the interests of performers is an important content to improve the background music charging system. The perfection of the system of charging for the use of background music in our country actually involves the construction of the whole copyright system of our country concerning the content of the copyright of music works. For example, the improvement of copyright collective management system is not only a background music use fee system to solve the problem, but also involves the improvement of the whole copyright legislation. In this process, whether the idea or legislative progress, is not an easy process.
【学位授予单位】:安徽大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2007
【分类号】:D923.41

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 张羽;浅议著作权集体管理与著作权代理[J];出版发行研究;2003年08期

2 蒋万来;论我国著作权集体管理制度的完善[J];电子知识产权;2003年11期

3 施国伟;;集体管理组织与使用者的关系及协调[J];法律适用;2006年Z1期

4 韦之;论著作权集体管理机构管理的权利——关于著作权法修订稿的思考[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1999年03期

5 湛益祥;论著作权集体管理[J];法学;2001年09期

6 杨明;;浅析请求权与私权体系构造的关系[J];华南理工大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期

7 吴汉东;知识产权的私权与人权属性——以《知识产权协议》与《世界人权公约》为对象[J];法学研究;2003年03期

8 宗晓军;音乐版权产业面面观(之一)[J];人民音乐;2000年01期

9 宗晓军;音乐版权产业面面观(之五)[J];人民音乐;2000年06期

10 宗晓军;音乐版权产业面面观(之六)[J];人民音乐;2000年07期



本文编号:2420996

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2420996.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户5889d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com