废旧产品回收利用之商标侵权问题研究
发布时间：2019-03-15 07:06
【摘要】：废旧产品回收利用是否侵犯商标权是一个崭新而复杂的问题，，给我国立法和司法的适用带来了巨大的挑战。为了破解这一难题，理论界和实务界纷纷提出自己的见解。本文主要以四个案例引出废旧产品的回收利用是否侵犯商标权的法律性质之争，对提出的争议进行了有理有据的分析。紧接着以此为基点，通过以混淆理论、商标权用尽原则、公共政策理论等商标法的基础理论为切入点，对争议考虑到的因素进行了考量，提出了废旧产品回收利用是侵犯商标专用权的行为的观点。主要框架如下： 第一部分主要陈述了废旧产品回收利用的法律性质之争。本部分主要简单界定了废旧产品回收利用的概念，并通过四个典型案例引出了废旧产品回收利用的四种情形。在案件处理的过程中，学界对废旧产品回收利用是否侵犯商标专用权的问题产生了严重分歧。通过整合对废旧产品回收利用是否侵权的争论，为下文的论证提供了一个良好的铺垫。 第二部分主要提出了废旧产品回收利用侵权与否的判断应该以混淆理论为标准。在判断废旧产品回收利用是否侵犯商标专用权时，主要借助了美国在处理废旧产品回收利用是否侵犯商标权方面的经验即说明真实情况原则，认为说明真实情况是混淆理论应考虑的一个因素。紧靠这个因素并结合混淆理论的基本原理对第一部分提出的四个案件进行了逐一分析和判断。最终认为废旧产品的回收利用是侵犯商标专用权的。 第三部分提出了商标权用尽原则是废旧产品回收利用侵权判定应考虑到的因素。首先通过简单梳理世界主要国家对商标权用尽原则作出的规定，认为废旧产品回收利用是商标权用尽原则的例外；其次对废旧产品回收利用不适用商标权用尽的原因进行了分析；最后提出了废旧产品回收利用存在商标权用尽的情形。 第四部分主要分析了在判断废旧产品回收利用是否侵犯商标权时不能用公共政策理论进行抗辩。知识产权不仅具有私权属性还有公共政策属性。它已经成为市场竞争的工具。各国纷纷提出知识产权战略，想占领市场的制高点。在知识产权公共政策属性的基础之上，有人提出了废旧产品回收利用可以用公共政策来抗辩商标侵权。本人不赞同此种观点，认为在废旧产品回收利用中是不能用公共政策因素来进行抗辩的。
[Abstract]:Whether the recycling of waste products infringes trademark right is a brand-new and complicated problem, which brings great challenge to the application of legislation and judicature in our country. In order to solve this problem, theorists and practical circles have put forward their own opinions. In this paper, four cases are used to find out whether the recycling of waste products infringes the legal nature of trademark rights, and the dispute is analyzed reasonably. Then, based on the theory of confusion, the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, the theory of public policy and other basic theories of trademark law, the author takes into account the factors taken into account in the dispute. This paper puts forward the viewpoint that recycling and utilization of waste products is a violation of trademark exclusive right. The main framework is as follows: the first part mainly describes the legal nature of waste products. In this part, the concept of recycling of waste products is defined, and four kinds of cases of recycling of waste products are introduced through four typical cases. In the process of dealing with the case, there are serious differences in the issue of whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringe the exclusive right of trademark. Through the integration of the waste product recycling infringement or not, this paper provides a good preparation for the following argument. In the second part, it is put forward that the judgment of recycling infringement of waste products should be based on the confusion theory. In judging whether the recycling of waste products infringes the right to exclusive use of trademarks, it mainly relies on the experience of the United States in dealing with whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringes on trademark rights, that is to say, the principle of the true situation. It is considered that explaining the real situation is a factor to be taken into account in the theory of confusion. On the basis of this factor and the basic principle of confusion theory, the four cases put forward in the first part are analyzed and judged one by one. Finally, it is considered that the recycling and utilization of waste products infringes the right of exclusive use of trademarks. The third part puts forward that the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights is the factor that should be taken into account in the judgment of the infringement of recycling and utilization of waste products. First of all, by simply combing the provisions made by the major countries in the world on the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, it is considered that recycling of waste products is the exception to the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights; Secondly, this paper analyzes the reasons why the recycling and utilization of waste products are not applicable to the exhaustion of trademark rights, and finally puts forward the situation of the exhaustion of trademark rights in the recycling and utilization of waste products. The fourth part mainly analyzes that the public policy theory can not be used in judging whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringe the trademark right. Intellectual property has not only the attribute of private right but also the attribute of public policy. It has become a tool for market competition. Countries have put forward intellectual property strategy, want to occupy the commanding heights of the market. On the basis of the public policy attribute of intellectual property rights, some people put forward that the recycling and utilization of waste products can defend trademark infringement by public policy. I do not agree with this view that the recycling of waste products can not be defended by public policy factors.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2440408
[Abstract]:Whether the recycling of waste products infringes trademark right is a brand-new and complicated problem, which brings great challenge to the application of legislation and judicature in our country. In order to solve this problem, theorists and practical circles have put forward their own opinions. In this paper, four cases are used to find out whether the recycling of waste products infringes the legal nature of trademark rights, and the dispute is analyzed reasonably. Then, based on the theory of confusion, the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, the theory of public policy and other basic theories of trademark law, the author takes into account the factors taken into account in the dispute. This paper puts forward the viewpoint that recycling and utilization of waste products is a violation of trademark exclusive right. The main framework is as follows: the first part mainly describes the legal nature of waste products. In this part, the concept of recycling of waste products is defined, and four kinds of cases of recycling of waste products are introduced through four typical cases. In the process of dealing with the case, there are serious differences in the issue of whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringe the exclusive right of trademark. Through the integration of the waste product recycling infringement or not, this paper provides a good preparation for the following argument. In the second part, it is put forward that the judgment of recycling infringement of waste products should be based on the confusion theory. In judging whether the recycling of waste products infringes the right to exclusive use of trademarks, it mainly relies on the experience of the United States in dealing with whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringes on trademark rights, that is to say, the principle of the true situation. It is considered that explaining the real situation is a factor to be taken into account in the theory of confusion. On the basis of this factor and the basic principle of confusion theory, the four cases put forward in the first part are analyzed and judged one by one. Finally, it is considered that the recycling and utilization of waste products infringes the right of exclusive use of trademarks. The third part puts forward that the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights is the factor that should be taken into account in the judgment of the infringement of recycling and utilization of waste products. First of all, by simply combing the provisions made by the major countries in the world on the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights, it is considered that recycling of waste products is the exception to the principle of exhaustion of trademark rights; Secondly, this paper analyzes the reasons why the recycling and utilization of waste products are not applicable to the exhaustion of trademark rights, and finally puts forward the situation of the exhaustion of trademark rights in the recycling and utilization of waste products. The fourth part mainly analyzes that the public policy theory can not be used in judging whether the recycling and utilization of waste products infringe the trademark right. Intellectual property has not only the attribute of private right but also the attribute of public policy. It has become a tool for market competition. Countries have put forward intellectual property strategy, want to occupy the commanding heights of the market. On the basis of the public policy attribute of intellectual property rights, some people put forward that the recycling and utilization of waste products can defend trademark infringement by public policy. I do not agree with this view that the recycling of waste products can not be defended by public policy factors.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 祝建军;;“旧手机换新壳”侵犯注册商标专用权[J];中华商标;2009年11期
2 高荣林;;旧物新用与商标侵权[J];中华商标;2010年06期
3 黄细江;;翻新手机的商标问题[J];中华商标;2012年01期
4 冯晓青;;知识产权的权利穷竭问题研究[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
5 邓宏光;;商标混淆理论的扩张[J];电子知识产权;2007年10期
6 黄汇;;售前混淆之批判和售后混淆之证成——兼谈我国《商标法》的第三次修改[J];电子知识产权;2008年06期
7 祖翠筠;;突破回收再造的瓶颈[J];21世纪商业评论;2009年08期
8 吴汉东;;利弊之间:知识产权制度的政策科学分析[J];法商研究;2006年05期
9 吴汉东;;知识产权法的平衡精神与平衡理论——冯晓青教授《知识产权法利益平衡理论》评析[J];法商研究;2007年05期
10 万志前;郑友德;;知识产权制度生态化重构初探[J];法学评论;2010年01期
本文编号：2440408
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2440408.html
