澳大利亚与我国煤炭资源储量评估规则对比研究

发布时间：2018-03-17 04:35

本文选题：评估规则　切入点：实践指南　出处：《中国煤炭》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在研究我国与澳大利亚矿业行业、企业及矿业资本市场的基础上,从煤炭资源储量评估基础、专业人员、依据、范围要求和结果使用方向五个方面分析,探讨了我国与澳大利亚煤炭资源储量评估规则的异同。结果表明澳大利亚矿业企业选择包括胜任人在内的专业人员以行业协会发布实践指南等为依据,估算3级资源量,根据企业需要估算2级储量或其他类别储量。我国要求有资质的单位根据相应标准规范估算16种资源储量。研究成果为我国煤炭资源储量评估规则完善和我国矿业企业在澳大利亚进行煤炭资源勘查投资提供了借鉴。
[Abstract]:On the basis of studying the mining industry, enterprises and the capital market of mining industry in Australia, the paper analyzes the basis of coal resource reserve evaluation, professional personnel, basis, scope requirement and result using direction. This paper discusses the similarities and differences of the rules of coal reserves assessment between China and Australia. The results show that Australian mining enterprises select professional personnel, including competent persons, to estimate the level 3 resources according to the practical guidelines issued by trade associations, etc. According to the needs of enterprises, the second grade reserves or other types of reserves are estimated. China requires qualified units to estimate 16 kinds of reserves according to the corresponding standards and norms. The results of the research are the perfection of the rules for the evaluation of reserves of China's coal resources and the development of China's mineral resources. The industry enterprise carries on the coal resources exploration investment in Australia to provide the reference.
【作者单位】：中国煤炭工业协会咨询中心;中国煤炭地质总局;
【基金】：国家矿产资源储量技术标准体系建设项目(国家专项)资助项目(国土资厅函[2015]1151号)
【分类号】：F416.21

【相似文献】