重点城市工业综合效率与产业转型升级:2011~2015年

发布时间：2018-04-18 10:18

本文选题：节能减排政策 + 工业转型效率　；参考：《改革》2017年09期

【摘要】：利用DEA-SBM模型,综合考虑资本、劳动力以及能源消耗,对2011~2015年中国36个重点城市进行工业-环境-能源综合效率评估,结果显示,"十二五"时期节能减排政策促进了各重点城市工业效率的提升;东部城市工业效率优于其他城市,西部地区工业效率有提升但仍落后于其他城市,中部、东北地区城市提升很大,接近或超过了其他城市平均水平;节能减排政策对工业基础较好的城市提升效果不明显,很多大型工业城市工业效率提升与其他城市相比进步较小;节能减排政策促进工业效率较高的产业从东部发达城市转移到中西部中等城市。在未来的发展规划中,节能减排政策不仅应当提升工业落后地区生产效率,更应当突破工业发达地区发展瓶颈,实现整个国家的产业转型升级。
[Abstract]:Based on the DEA-SBM model and considering the capital, labor and energy consumption, the comprehensive efficiency of industrial, environmental and energy in 36 key cities in China from 2011 to 2015 was evaluated.The results show that the energy saving and emission reduction policies in the 12th Five-Year Plan period promote the industrial efficiency of the key cities, the industrial efficiency of the eastern cities is better than that of other cities, and the industrial efficiency of the western region is still lagging behind that of other cities.The promotion of cities in Northeast China is very large, which approaches or exceeds the average level of other cities, the effect of energy saving and emission reduction policies on cities with good industrial foundation is not obvious, and the industrial efficiency improvement of many large industrial cities is smaller than that of other cities.Energy-saving and emission reduction policies promote the transfer of more efficient industries from developed cities in the east to middle-sized cities in the central and western regions.In the future development planning, the policy of energy saving and emission reduction should not only improve the production efficiency of backward industrial areas, but also break through the bottleneck of industrial development in developed regions, and realize the industrial transformation and upgrading of the whole country.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院;美国乔治城大学;
【分类号】：F121.3;F224;F424

【相似文献】