企业“破产重整”期间的电费债权保护研究

发布时间：2018-10-13 14:20

【摘要】：现代意义上破产,除了破产清算制度,还包括以挽救债务人、预防破产为目的的重整、和解等法律制度。破产重整制度作为公司破产制度的重要组成部分,至1929年首先在英国确立以来,己为世界上多数市场经济国家采用。我国2007年实施的《企业破产法》(下称新破产法)新增破产重整制度,应用日益广泛,对供电企业生产经营的影响日益突出。破产重整电费债权保护是随破产重整制度实施而产生的新课题。“先用电、后交费”的模式,导致企业被裁定进入破产重整程序后,必然有一定数量的电费未结算,这一部分电费就属于破产重整电费债权。电费结算的非及时性使供电企业长期面临系统性的电费回收风险。本文考虑企业破产重整与电网企业电费回收“及时、足额、安全”的“相对矛盾”问题,首先梳理了国内外破产重整、电费债权的相关理论,阐述了破产重整案件的概况及在浙江的衍生发展,根据破产重整的特点分析了其对电费债权保护的影响。其次,针对破产重整启动期间、计划制订与通过期间、计划实施期间等全流程的三个阶段,基于企业破产重整适用对象、申请发起主体、电费债权申报、电费债权分组、电费债权“表决权”、重整计划典型类型、重整计划实施期间的供用电合同履行等要素导致的电费债权保护的主要问题,分别提出了问题解决的方案建议。然后,基于担保权行使最大化、重整计划关键条款两个角度,又提出了破产重整电费担保债权保护问题的解决建议,并形成了相关重点法条规定清单,同时还提出了通过应用电费银行履约保函,解决破产重整电费债权保护问题的建议。最后,通过对企业破产重整、大企业“类司法重整”、关联企业“类司法重整”等典型实例中的电费债权保护分析,并借鉴银行对同类法律风险处置的成功经验,提出了针对不同类型企业破产重整电费债权保护的解决方案。本文以当前国内外经济形势下,不断有大中型企业进入破产环节为背景,结合破产重整制度的种种特征,将普通电费债权保护、担保电费债权保护和公益电费债权保护进行详细的风险管控,形成一套行之有效的风险管控体系,为基层供电公司在电费回收方面提供参考。
[Abstract]:Bankruptcy in modern sense, in addition to bankruptcy liquidation system, but also includes the purpose of saving the debtor, prevention of bankruptcy reorganization, reconciliation and other legal systems. As an important part of corporate bankruptcy system, bankruptcy reorganization system has been adopted by most market economy countries since it was first established in England in 1929. The new bankruptcy reorganization system implemented in China in 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the new bankruptcy law) has become increasingly widely used and has an increasingly prominent impact on the production and operation of power supply enterprises. The protection of tariff claims in bankruptcy reorganization is a new subject arising from the implementation of bankruptcy reorganization system. The mode of "use electricity first, then pay fees" results in the enterprise being ruled into bankruptcy reorganization procedure, there must be a certain amount of electricity bill not settled, and this part of electricity price belongs to the creditor's right of bankruptcy reorganization tariff. The non-timely settlement of electricity charges makes power supply enterprises face systematic risk of electricity recovery for a long time. Considering the "relative contradiction" between enterprise bankruptcy reorganization and electricity recovery of power grid enterprises, this paper firstly combs the related theories of domestic and foreign bankruptcy reorganization and power tariff creditor's rights. This paper expounds the general situation of bankruptcy reorganization case and its derivative development in Zhejiang Province, and analyzes its influence on the protection of electricity power claims according to the characteristics of bankruptcy reorganization. Secondly, according to the three stages of the whole process, such as the period of the bankruptcy reorganization, the period of plan formulation and adoption, the period of the implementation of the plan, based on the applicable object of bankruptcy reorganization of the enterprise, the main body of the application, the declaration of the claim on electricity bill, the grouping of the credit on electricity, The main problems in the protection of electricity claims caused by the factors such as "voting rights", typical types of reorganization plans, and the fulfillment of power supply contracts during the implementation of the reorganization plans are put forward respectively. Then, based on the maximization of the exercise of the security right and the key provisions of the reorganization plan, the paper puts forward some suggestions to solve the problem of the protection of the secured claims of the electricity bill in bankruptcy reorganization, and forms a list of relevant key provisions. At the same time, the paper puts forward some suggestions on how to solve the problem of the protection of tariff claims through the application of electricity bill bank performance guarantee. Finally, by analyzing the typical examples of enterprise bankruptcy reorganization, large enterprise "quasi-judicial reorganization" and affiliated enterprise "quasi-judicial reorganization", the paper analyzes the protection of electricity claims, and draws lessons from the successful experiences of banks in dealing with similar legal risks. This paper puts forward a solution to the protection of tariff claims for different types of enterprises. Based on the current domestic and international economic situation, large and medium-sized enterprises enter the bankruptcy link as the background, combined with the various characteristics of the bankruptcy restructuring system, ordinary electricity claims will be protected. In order to provide reference for the basic power supply companies in the recovery of electricity charges, a set of effective risk control system has been formed through the detailed risk control of the protection of secured tariff claims and the protection of public interest electricity claims.
【学位授予单位】：华北电力大学(北京)
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F426.61;F406.7;F832.4

【参考文献】