综合优势、发展战略与金融危机——对“东亚奇迹”及金融危机的再解释

发布时间：2018-08-23 14:02

【摘要】：近十年来,关于一国或地区(尤其是欠发达国家或地区)应该选择何种经济发展战略的问题,在我国经济学界中出现了赶超战略论与比较优势战略论之争。本文提出了"综合优势战略论":在经济发展过程中,实施赶超战略容易造成"赶超困境",而实施比较优势战略则容易陷入"比较优势陷阱",只有实施综合考虑比较优势、分工优势和交易效率优势的"综合优势发展战略",才能够使经济持续、健康、快速地发展。"东亚奇迹"既非比较优势战略之功劳,也不是赶超战略之成就,而是实施综合优势战略的结果。偏离综合优势的经济更易于出现金融危机:赶超战略式的过度创新导致了源自美国的国际金融危机,而比较优势战略则引发了1997年的东南亚金融危机。
[Abstract]:In the past ten years, there has been a dispute between the theory of catching up and surpassing strategy and the theory of comparative advantage strategy in our country or region, especially in less developed countries or regions, which should be chosen as the economic development strategy. This paper puts forward the theory of "comprehensive advantage strategy": in the process of economic development, the implementation of catch-up strategy can easily lead to "catching up and overtaking dilemma", but the implementation of comparative advantage strategy is easy to fall into the "comparative advantage trap", only to implement comprehensive consideration of comparative advantage. The "comprehensive advantage development strategy" of the advantage of division of labor and trade efficiency can make the economy develop continuously, healthily and rapidly. " The East Asian Miracle is neither the credit of the comparative advantage strategy nor the achievement of the catch-up strategy, but the result of the implementation of the comprehensive advantage strategy. The economy that deviates from the comprehensive advantage is more prone to the financial crisis: the overinnovation of catch-up strategy leads to the international financial crisis originating from the United States, and the comparative advantage strategy leads to the financial crisis in Southeast Asia in 1997.
【作者单位】：广西大学商学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目《提高开放型经济水平的优势依托研究》(编号08BJL044)阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：F831.5

【相似文献】