开放决策、公共对话与地方治理创新——以温州特色智库体系为例

发布时间：2018-02-16 15:28

本文关键词： 开放型决策公共对话治理创新温州特色智库体系　出处：《理论与改革》2017年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：面向和回应日益高度复杂的决策生态,开放型决策及其公共对话过程是新常态背景下公共决策咨询的基本模式。温州特色智库体系基于“总部—网络”的组织创新与多元智库主体线上线下良性互动的公共对话网络,构成了我国地方政府探索建构开放型决策模式的典型案例;其有效整合了官方智库的政策性与服务引导、专家与高校智库的理论性与专业知识、民间智库的民生性与民主参与、企业智库的应用性与实践影响等多维力量。温州智库体系的开放型决策过程不仅促进了多元主体间实现“1+12”的信息聚合,而且有助于平衡多元利益偏好诉求和保障公共利益实现,增进公众民主智识,回应充满不确定性的动态治理情境,有效促进公共决策的社会建构过程,通过扬长避短、合作共谋的聚智促公模式,最终积极推进了多元治理主体的有序衔接与良性互动。
[Abstract]:Facing and responding to the increasingly complex ecology of decision-making, The open decision-making and its process of public dialogue are the basic modes of public decision-making consultation under the new normal background. The Wenzhou characteristic think-tank system is based on the "headquarters-network" organization innovation and the public dialogue network between the main body of the multi-think-tank and the online and offline benign interaction. It constitutes a typical case of local governments in China to explore and construct an open decision-making model, which effectively integrates the policy and service guidance of official think tanks, the theoretical and professional knowledge of experts and university think tanks, and the livelihood and democratic participation of non-governmental think tanks. The application and practical influence of enterprise think tanks are multi-dimensional forces. The open decision-making process of Wenzhou think-tank system not only promotes the realization of "112" information aggregation among multiple agents. Moreover, it is helpful to balance the demands of multi-interest preference and safeguard the realization of public interest, to promote the public democratic wisdom, to respond to the uncertain dynamic governance situation, and to effectively promote the social construction process of public decision-making. The mode of cooperation and collusion promotes the orderly convergence and benign interaction of multiple governance subjects.
【作者单位】：南京农业大学公共管理学院;
【分类号】：D63

【参考文献】