古代中国如何使用“智库”

发布时间：2018-04-10 02:26

  本文选题：古代中国　切入点：个人身份　出处：《中国党政干部论坛》2015年02期

【摘要】：正现代意义上的"智库"机构,在中国古代应该是没有的。但如果论向决策者提供咨询服务的,则以下两种情况较为常见:一是某些官职具有咨询、参议与信息搜集整理等方面的职能,为君主或长官决策提供服务,其职能与智库类似;二是古代知识分子以个人身份为君主或长官出谋划策,这些人形成一个群体,便自然成为一个智囊团。这两种情形在有些情况下可能重叠,比如,长官有时可自辟僚属,这些僚属一方面在封建官僚体制中拥有一定的职位,为国家而工作,同时他又与长官
[Abstract]:In the modern sense, think-tank institutions should not exist in ancient China.However, if advisory services are provided to decision-makers, the following two situations are more common: first, some official posts have functions of consultation, consultation and information collection and collation, which provide services for the decision of the sovereign or governor, and their functions are similar to those of think tanks;The other is that the ancient intellectuals gave advice to the monarch or governor in their personal capacity, and these people formed a group and naturally became a think-tank.In some cases, the two situations may overlap. For example, an officer may sometimes create his own staff, who, on the one hand, have certain posts in the feudal bureaucracy and work for the country, while at the same time working with their superiors.
【作者单位】： 浙江省社会科学院浙江历史文化研究中心;
【分类号】：C932.82
，

本文编号：1729260