当前位置:主页 > 管理论文 > 管理理论论文 >

国家治理视域下的民间智库影响力研究

发布时间:2018-04-10 20:41

  本文选题:民间智库 + 国家治理 ; 参考:《南京师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:国家治理是国家、社会以及公民个人合作治理公共事务的一种制度和权力安排,核心在于通过分权、让权、放权、赋权等途径打破政府单一治理主体对公共权力的垄断,促成国家权力回归社会。在此过程中,国家和社会通过制度化的、持续的互动合作过程实现公共目标和公共利益的最大化。智库咨询机构在国家治理能力和治理体系现代化过程中的重要作用得到了政界和学界的普遍认同。我国智库建设已经步入了务实合作的全新阶段,这也是国家治理能力提升的关键一步。在此背景下,民间智库在中国特色智库格局中的弱势地位则难与中国智库整体发展要求相匹配,当务之急应准确判断民间智库发展困境,着力提升民间智库影响力。本文认为民间智库影响力指智库机构对于政策咨询、学术研究、企业与社会发展以及社会舆论等的影响能力,其中民间智库对政策决策过程的影响能力是衡量一个咨询机构综合实力的核心指标。民间智库影响力的大小指智库能在多大程度上对政策决策过程产生影响。民间智库具有广泛的发展理论背景,治理理论的诉求,服务型STS理论、知识市场的兴起,都将民间智库推上了现代公共政策研究的前沿。结合民间智库代表——北京天则经济研究所发展现状,可以发现我国民间智库面临着参与公共决策支持水平低、独立性和创新性特征不明显、缺乏产品营销意识与渠道、自身组织管理机制不健全等一系列现实发展限度。三权分立创设良好政策环境且慈善传统发达的美国智库、与政党联系密切且注重宣传推广的欧洲智库都为我国民间智库影响力培育提供了丰富的经验和启示。提升我国民间智库综合影响力的路径可以分为以下几个方面:在构建中国特色新型智库体系的过程中,政府进行配套改革并完善相关法律法规,为民间智库成长提供政策法律保障;充分调动人才、资金和关系等社会各项要素,为民间智库打牢社会根基;完善民间智库影响力测评、研究过程与成果管理、组织管理和营销管理机制,从内部激发民间智库组织的发展活力。
[Abstract]:State governance is a kind of system and power arrangement for the government, society and individual citizens to manage public affairs in cooperation. The core is to break the monopoly of the public power by the single governance subject of the government through the means of separation of powers, abdication, devolution, empowerment and so on.Promote the return of state power to society.In this process, the state and society achieve the maximization of public objectives and public interests through the process of institutionalized and continuous interaction and cooperation.The important role of think-tank advisory organization in the process of modernization of national governance capacity and governance system has been generally recognized by political and academic circles.China's think-tank construction has entered a new stage of pragmatic cooperation, which is also a key step to improve the national governance capacity.In this context, the weak position of folk think tanks in the pattern of think tanks with Chinese characteristics is difficult to match with the overall development requirements of Chinese think tanks.This paper argues that the influence of private think tanks refers to the ability of think tanks to influence policy advice, academic research, business and social development, and public opinion.Among them, the ability of private think tanks to influence policy decision-making process is the core index to measure the comprehensive strength of an advisory body.The influence of private think tanks refers to the extent to which they can influence the policy-making process.The folk think-tank has the extensive development theory background, the request of the governance theory, the service type STS theory, the rise of the knowledge market, all have pushed the folk think tank to the front of the modern public policy research.Combined with the current development situation of the representative of the non-governmental think-tank, the Beijing Tianze Institute of Economics, we can find that our country's non-governmental think tanks are faced with low level of support for participating in public decision-making, lack of independence and innovative characteristics, and lack of product marketing awareness and channels.Its own organization management mechanism is not perfect and so on a series of realistic development limits.The separation of powers creates American think-tanks with good policy environment and developed philanthropic tradition. European think-tanks, which are closely connected with political parties and pay attention to propaganda and promotion, have provided rich experience and inspiration for the cultivation of the influence of civil think tanks in China.The path to enhance the comprehensive influence of Chinese folk think tanks can be divided into the following aspects: in the process of building a new type of think tank system with Chinese characteristics, the government carries out complementary reforms and consummates the relevant laws and regulations.To provide policy and legal protection for the growth of non-governmental think tanks; to fully mobilize talents, funds and relationships and other social elements, to lay a solid social foundation for non-governmental think tanks; to improve the impact assessment, research process and results management of private think tanks;Organizational management and marketing management mechanism to stimulate the development of non-governmental think-tank organizations from the internal vitality.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:C932

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 潘晔华;;智库参与国家治理的逻辑及效能提升——评《中国特色新型智库与国家治理现代化》[J];出版广角;2016年09期

2 钱再见;;新型智库参与公共政策制定的制度化路径研究——以公共权力为视角[J];智库理论与实践;2016年01期

3 刘根;文亚青;;市场营销:中国特色新型智库建设的重要问题[J];沿海企业与科技;2016年01期

4 孙蔚;;国家治理视野下的中国特色新型智库[J];中共中央党校学报;2014年04期

5 王莉丽;;论美国智库舆论影响力的形成机制[J];国外社会科学;2014年03期

6 金家厚;;民间智库发展:现状、逻辑与机制[J];行政论坛;2014年01期

7 俞可平;;推进国家治理体系和治理能力现代化[J];前线;2014年01期

8 国务院发展研究中心公共管理与人力资源研究所"国外智库管理体系研究"课题组;王佩亨;李国强;田琳琳;炜班;银纯泉;;注重提升影响力的英国智库[J];管理观察;2013年28期

9 覃爱玲;;天则:一个民间智库的20年沉浮[J];南风窗;2013年11期

10 孙志茹;张志强;;基于知识运用理论的学术研究政策影响力评价框架研究[J];图书情报工作;2013年08期

相关重要报纸文章 前4条

1 ;加强河北新型智库建设[N];河北日报;2015年

2 王继承;;麦甘“全球智库报告”排名机制及其影响(下)[N];中国经济时报;2012年

3 雷辉 ;陈燕玲;李小伟;;谁在给中央政治局授课?[N];南方日报;2012年

4 樊鹏;;公共投资主导的德国智库[N];中国社会科学报;2012年

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 徐晓虎;地方智库的构成要素和竞争力研究[D];南京航空航天大学;2014年



本文编号:1732829

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/glzh/1732829.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户2e986***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com