智库评价研究进展及我国智库评价建设

发布时间：2018-05-12 01:15

  本文选题：智库评价 + 评价模式　； 参考：《情报杂志》2017年08期

【摘要】：[目的/意义]智库成为一个全球化的现象,对智库进行科学合理的评价有助于推动智库的发展,提高智库的影响力。[方法/过程]从智库评价的宏观层面入手,对比介绍了市场主导、政府主导和第三方主导的评价模式;针对形形色色的第三方模式,探讨了目前典型的评价体系的优缺点,然后从微观层面介绍了目前学术界对智库评价的研究。[结果/结论]研究发现,各个国家的评价模式都存在一定的弊端,但都建立了基于各国特色的评价体系,各国学者对评价指标的细分探讨也颇为详尽,而我国的智库建设和智库评价建设都处于起步阶段,我国的智库评价建设应与智库建设相辅相成。
[Abstract]:Objective / significance: think-tank becomes a global phenomenon, and scientific and reasonable evaluation of think-tank is helpful to promote the development of think-tank and enhance the influence of think-tank. [method / process] from the macroscopic aspect of evaluation of think-tank, this paper compares and introduces the evaluation modes of market leading, government leading and third party leading, and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of typical evaluation system in view of various third party models. Then it introduces the current academic research on the evaluation of think tanks from the micro level. [results / conclusions] the study found that the evaluation models of each country have some drawbacks, but all have established evaluation systems based on the characteristics of each country, and scholars from various countries have also discussed in detail the subdivision of evaluation indicators. However, the construction of think-tank and the evaluation of think-tank in China are at the initial stage, and the construction of think-tank evaluation in China should complement the construction of think-tank.
【作者单位】： 中国科学院大学;中国科学院成都文献情报中心;
【基金】：中国科学院项目“重要科技领域战略情报研究服务体系建设项目”研究成果之一
【分类号】：C932
，

本文编号：1876463